Department of Health Service and Population Research, NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit COVID-19 Co-Production Group, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 16;16(9):e0257270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257270. eCollection 2021.
The prominence of telemental health, including providing care by video call and telephone, has greatly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there are clear variations in uptake and acceptability, and concerns that digital exclusion may exacerbate previous inequalities in access to good quality care. Greater understanding is needed of how service users experience telemental health, and what determines whether they engage and find it acceptable.
We conducted a collaborative framework analysis of data from semi-structured interviews with a sample of people already experiencing mental health problems prior to the pandemic. Data relevant to participants' experiences and views regarding telemental health during the pandemic were identified and extracted. Data collection and analysis used a participatory, coproduction approach where researchers with relevant lived experience, contributed to all stages of data collection, analysis and interpretation of findings alongside clinical and academic researchers.
The experiences and preferences regarding telemental health care of the forty-four participants were dynamic and varied across time and settings, as well as between individuals. Participants' preferences were shaped by reasons for contacting services, their relationship with care providers, and both parties' access to technology and their individual preferences. While face-to-face care tended to be the preferred option, participants identified benefits of remote care including making care more accessible for some populations and improved efficiency for functional appointments such as prescription reviews. Participants highlighted important challenges related to safety and privacy in online settings, and gave examples of good remote care strategies they had experienced, including services scheduling regular phone calls and developing guidelines about how to access remote care tools.
Participants in our study have highlighted advantages of telemental health care, as well as significant limitations that risk hindering mental health support and exacerbate inequalities in access to services. Some of these limitations are seen as potentially removable, for example through staff training or better digital access for staff or service users. Others indicate a need to maintain traditional face-to-face contact at least for some appointments. There is a clear need for care to be flexible and individualised to service user circumstances and preferences. Further research is needed on ways of minimising digital exclusion and of supporting staff in making effective and collaborative use of relevant technologies.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,远程心理健康服务(包括通过视频通话和电话提供护理)的重要性大大提高。然而,使用率和接受度存在明显差异,人们担心数字排斥可能会加剧先前在获得高质量护理方面的不平等。我们需要更多地了解服务使用者体验远程心理健康服务的方式,以及决定他们是否参与并认为其可接受的因素。
我们对一组在大流行前已经经历心理健康问题的患者进行了半结构化访谈,对访谈数据进行了合作框架分析。确定并提取了与参与者在大流行期间远程心理健康服务体验和看法相关的数据。数据收集和分析采用了一种参与式、共同创作的方法,具有相关生活经验的研究人员与临床和学术研究人员一起参与了数据收集、分析和结果解释的所有阶段。
44 名参与者的远程医疗体验和偏好是动态的,因时间和环境以及个人的不同而有所不同。参与者的偏好受到联系服务的原因、与护理提供者的关系以及双方的技术获取和个人偏好的影响。虽然面对面护理往往是首选,但参与者也确定了远程护理的一些好处,包括为某些人群提供更便捷的护理服务以及提高预约如处方审查的效率。参与者强调了在线环境中与安全和隐私相关的重要挑战,并举例说明了他们所经历的良好远程护理策略,包括服务安排定期电话联系以及制定如何访问远程护理工具的准则。
我们的研究参与者强调了远程医疗保健的优势,以及一些可能会阻碍心理健康支持并加剧服务获取不平等的重大限制。其中一些限制被认为是可以消除的,例如通过员工培训或改善员工或服务使用者的数字接入。其他限制则表明至少在某些预约中需要保持传统的面对面接触。护理服务需要灵活且个性化,以适应服务使用者的情况和偏好。需要进一步研究如何减少数字排斥以及支持员工有效和协作地使用相关技术。