Pavlou Athanasios, Kurtz Robert M, Song Jae W
St. Vincent's Medical Center, Bridgeport, CT, USA.
Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine, North Haven, CT, USA.
Radiol Res Pract. 2021 Sep 6;2021:5801662. doi: 10.1155/2021/5801662. eCollection 2021.
Accuracy is an important parameter of a diagnostic test. Studies that attempt to determine a test's accuracy can suffer from various forms of bias. As radiology is a diagnostic specialty, many radiologists may design a diagnostic accuracy study or review one to understand how it may apply to their practice. Radiologists also frequently serve as consultants to other physicians regarding the selection of the most appropriate diagnostic exams. In these roles, understanding how to critically appraise the literature is important for all radiologists. The purpose of this review is to provide a framework for evaluating potential sources of study design biases that are found in diagnostic accuracy studies and to explain their impact on sensitivity and specificity estimates. To help the reader understand these biases, we also present examples from the radiology literature.
准确性是诊断测试的一个重要参数。试图确定一项测试准确性的研究可能会受到各种形式的偏差影响。由于放射学是一个诊断专业,许多放射科医生可能会设计一项诊断准确性研究或对其进行评估,以了解它如何应用于他们的实践。放射科医生还经常就最合适的诊断检查的选择为其他医生提供咨询。在这些角色中,了解如何批判性地评估文献对所有放射科医生来说都很重要。本综述的目的是提供一个框架,用于评估在诊断准确性研究中发现的潜在研究设计偏差来源,并解释它们对敏感性和特异性估计的影响。为了帮助读者理解这些偏差,我们还从放射学文献中举了例子。