Zhao Hua, Su Longxiang, Ding Xin, Chen Huan, Zhang Hongmin, Wang Jinglan, Long Yun, Zhou Xiang, Zhang Shuyang
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Department of Respiratory, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Aug 31;8:678157. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.678157. eCollection 2021.
This study aimed to describe the clinical and laboratory characteristics and the parameters of the respiratory mechanics of mechanically ventilated patients with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia and to clarify the risk or protective factors for weaning failure. Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia were selected from the special intensive care unit (ICU) of the Sino-French New City Branch of Tong Ji Hospital, Wuhan, and treated by the National Medical Team Work. They were divided into successful weaning (SW) group ( = 15) and unsuccessful weaning (USW) group ( = 18) according to the prognosis. Information of these patients was analyzed. There were 33 patients included in this study. Patients in the USW group were associated with a poor outcome; the 28-day mortality rate was higher than in the SW group (86.7 vs. 16.7% < 0.001). By comparison, we found that the initial plateau pressure (Pplat) and driving pressure (DP) of the USW group were higher and that compliance was lower than that of the SW group, but there was no difference between positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO), and the ratio of partial pressure arterial oxygen and fraction of inspired oxygen (P/F ratio). Comparing the worst respiratory mechanics parameters of the two groups, the results of the Pplat, DP, compliance, and PEEP were the same as the initial data. The PCO of the USW group was higher, while the P/F ratio was lower. A logistic regression analysis suggested that higher Pplat might be an independent risk factor and that higher compliance and lower DP might be protective factors for weaning failure of invasive mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Patients with USW were associated with a poor outcome, higher Pplat might be a risk factor, and a higher compliance and a lower DP might be protective factors for the weaning failure of ventilated COVID-19 patients. Mechanical ventilation settings will affect the patient's prognosis.
本研究旨在描述确诊为新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)的机械通气患者的临床和实验室特征以及呼吸力学参数,并阐明撤机失败的风险或保护因素。从武汉同济医院中法新城院区的特殊重症监护病房(ICU)选取诊断为COVID-19肺炎的患者,并由国家医疗队进行治疗。根据预后将他们分为成功撤机(SW)组(n = 15)和撤机失败(USW)组(n = 18)。对这些患者的信息进行分析。本研究共纳入33例患者。USW组患者预后较差;28天死亡率高于SW组(86.7% 对16.7%,P < 0.001)。通过比较,我们发现USW组的初始平台压(Pplat)和驱动压(DP)较高,而顺应性低于SW组,但呼气末正压(PEEP)、二氧化碳分压(PCO₂)以及动脉血氧分压与吸入氧分数之比(P/F比值)之间无差异。比较两组最差的呼吸力学参数,Pplat、DP、顺应性和PEEP的结果与初始数据相同。USW组的PCO₂较高,而P/F比值较低。逻辑回归分析表明,较高的Pplat可能是独立危险因素,而较高的顺应性和较低的DP可能是COVID-19肺炎有创机械通气患者撤机失败的保护因素。USW组患者预后较差,较高的Pplat可能是危险因素,而较高的顺应性和较低的DP可能是COVID-19通气患者撤机失败的保护因素。机械通气设置会影响患者的预后。