Hua Zhao, Xin Ding, Xiaoting Wang, Dawei Liu
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Aug 31;8:715099. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.715099. eCollection 2021.
Optimal adjustment of cardiac preload is essential for improving left ventricle stroke volume (LVSV) and tissue perfusion. Changes in LVSV caused by central venous pressure (CVP) are the most important concerns in the treatment of critically ill patients. This study aimed to clarify the changes in LVSV after negative fluid balance in patients with elevated CVP, and to elucidate the relationship between the parameters of right ventricle (RV) filling state and LVSV changes. This prospective cohort study included patients with high central venous pressure (CVP) (≥8 mmHg) within 24 h of ICU admission in the Critical Medicine Department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Patients were classified into two groups based on the LVSV changes after negative fluid balance. The cutoff value was 10%. The hemodynamic and echo parameters of the two groups were recorded at baseline and after negative fluid balance. A total of 71 patients included in this study. Forty in VI Group (LVOT VTI increased ≥10%) and 31 in VNI Group (LVOT VTI increased <10%). Of all patients, 56.3% showed increased LVSV after negative fluid balance. In terms of hemodynamic parameters at T0, patients in VI Group had a higher CVP ( < 0.001) and P(v-a)CO ( < 0.001) and lower ScVO ( < 0.001) relative to VNI Group, regarding the echo parameters at T0, the RV/LV ratio ( < 0.001), DIVC ( < 0.001), and ΔLVOT VTI ( < 0.001) were higher, while T0 LVOT VTI ( < 0.001) was lower, in VI Group patients. The multifactor logistic regression analysis suggested that a high CVP and RV/LV ratio ≥0.6 were significant associated with LVSV increase after negative fluid balance in critically patients. The AUC of CVP was 0.894. A CVP >10.5 mmHg provided a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 77.4%. The AUC of CVP combined with the RV/LV ratio ≥0.6 was 0.926, which provided a sensitivity of 92.6% and a specificity of 80.4%. High CVP and RV/LV ratio ≥0.6 were significant associated with RV stressed in critically patients. Negative fluid balance will not always lead to a decrease, even an increase, in LVSV in these patients.
优化心脏前负荷对于提高左心室每搏输出量(LVSV)和组织灌注至关重要。中心静脉压(CVP)引起的LVSV变化是重症患者治疗中最重要的关注点。本研究旨在阐明CVP升高患者负液体平衡后LVSV的变化,并阐明右心室(RV)充盈状态参数与LVSV变化之间的关系。这项前瞻性队列研究纳入了北京协和医院重症医学科ICU入院24小时内中心静脉压(CVP)高(≥8 mmHg)的患者。根据负液体平衡后LVSV的变化将患者分为两组。截断值为10%。在基线和负液体平衡后记录两组的血流动力学和超声心动图参数。本研究共纳入71例患者。VI组40例(左心室流出道VTI增加≥10%),VNI组31例(左心室流出道VTI增加<10%)。所有患者中,56.3%在负液体平衡后LVSV增加。在T0时的血流动力学参数方面,相对于VNI组,VI组患者的CVP更高(<0.001)、P(v-a)CO更高(<0.001)、ScVO更低(<0.001);在T0时的超声心动图参数方面,VI组患者的RV/LV比值更高(<0.001)、舒张期室间隔厚度更高(<0.001)、Δ左心室流出道VTI更高(<0.001),而T0时左心室流出道VTI更低(<0.001)。多因素逻辑回归分析表明,高CVP和RV/LV比值≥0.6与重症患者负液体平衡后LVSV增加显著相关。CVP的AUC为0.894。CVP>10.5 mmHg时,敏感性为87.5%,特异性为77.4%。CVP与RV/LV比值≥0.6联合的AUC为0.926,敏感性为92.6%,特异性为80.4%。高CVP和RV/LV比值≥0.6与重症患者右心室负荷过重显著相关。负液体平衡在这些患者中并不总是导致LVSV降低,甚至可能导致增加。