• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

程控间歇性硬膜外推注用于剖宫产术后镇痛:一项随机对照双盲试验。

Programmed intermittent epidural bolus for post-cesarean delivery analgesia: a randomized controlled double-blind trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Xueshi Road 1#, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

J Anesth. 2022 Feb;36(1):32-37. doi: 10.1007/s00540-021-03002-x. Epub 2021 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00540-021-03002-x
PMID:34532785
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of programmed intermittent epidural boluses (PIEB) in postoperative pain management compared with continuous epidural infusion (CEI) after cesarean delivery.

METHODS

A total of 58 participants were randomly allocated to receive PIEB (3 mL bolus every 60 min) or CEI (3 mL/h) for postoperative analgesia after undergoing elective cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Both groups had the same epidural solution containing ropivacaine 0.2% plus fentanyl 2 µg/mL. The primary outcome was postoperative pain score at rest and mobilization at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. The secondary outcomes were the total amount of ropivacaine used in the 48 h study period and the time to the first PCEA bolus.

RESULTS

Data from 58 women were analyzed. There was a reduction in pain verbal numerical rating scores at 12 h in patients receiving PIEB compared with CEI at rest [2 (1.75-3) vs. 3 (2-4), p = 0.011]; and on movement [4 (3-5) vs. 5 (4-6), p = 0.038]. No differences were found in pain scores at any other time-point up to 48 h. Total ropivacaine consumption at 48 h was less in the PIEB group compared with the CEI group [316 mg (304-321) vs. 336 mg (319-344), p = 0.001].

CONCLUSION

Postoperative epidural analgesia for patients who underwent cesarean delivery with PIEB compared with CEI resulted in less ropivacaine usage while providing comparable analgesia.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估程控硬膜外间断推注(PIEB)与连续硬膜外输注(CEI)用于剖宫产术后镇痛的疗效。

方法

58 例患者随机分为 PIEB 组(每 60 分钟推注 3 毫升)或 CEI 组(3 毫升/小时),行腰硬联合麻醉下择期剖宫产术后接受硬膜外镇痛。两组硬膜外均采用罗哌卡因 0.2%加芬太尼 2μg/ml 的相同溶液。主要结局是术后 6、12、24 和 48 小时静息和活动时的疼痛评分。次要结局是 48 小时研究期间罗哌卡因的总用量和首次使用患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)推注的时间。

结果

58 例女性患者的数据被分析。与 CEI 组相比,PIEB 组患者在静息时 12 小时的疼痛数字评分量表(VRS)评分降低[2(1.75-3)比 3(2-4),p=0.011];在运动时[4(3-5)比 5(4-6),p=0.038]。在 48 小时内的其他任何时间点,疼痛评分均无差异。48 小时时 PIEB 组罗哌卡因总用量少于 CEI 组[316mg(304-321)比 336mg(319-344),p=0.001]。

结论

与 CEI 相比,剖宫产术后行 PIEB 的患者硬膜外镇痛可减少罗哌卡因的使用,同时提供等效的镇痛效果。

相似文献

1
Programmed intermittent epidural bolus for post-cesarean delivery analgesia: a randomized controlled double-blind trial.程控间歇性硬膜外推注用于剖宫产术后镇痛:一项随机对照双盲试验。
J Anesth. 2022 Feb;36(1):32-37. doi: 10.1007/s00540-021-03002-x. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
2
Patient intermittent epidural boluses (PIEB) plus very low continuous epidural infusion (CEI) versus patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) plus continuous epidural infusion (CEI) in primiparous labour: a randomized trial.产妇硬膜外间断推注(PIEB)加非常低浓度持续硬膜外输注(CEI)与产妇自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)加持续硬膜外输注(CEI)用于初产妇分娩:一项随机试验。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2019 Oct;33(5):879-885. doi: 10.1007/s10877-018-0229-x. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
3
Programmed intermittent epidural bolus decreases the incidence of intra-partum fever for labor analgesia in primiparous women: a randomized controlled study.程序化间歇硬膜外推注降低初产妇分娩镇痛中产时发热的发生率:一项随机对照研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Dec;300(6):1551-1557. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05354-y. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
4
Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia after major abdominal and gynecological cancer surgery: a randomized, triple-blinded clinical trial.腹部和妇科大手术术后镇痛中,程序化间歇性硬膜外推注与持续硬膜外输注的比较:一项随机、三盲临床试验
BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Oct 30;18(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0613-6.
5
Comparison of analgesic effects between programmed intermittent epidural boluses and continuous epidural infusion after cesarean section: a randomized controlled study.剖宫产术后程控硬膜外间断推注与持续输注镇痛效果比较:一项随机对照研究。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2024 Jun;77(3):374-383. doi: 10.4097/kja.23726. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
6
A retrospective comparison of programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for maintenance of labor analgesia.分娩镇痛维持中程序化间歇性硬膜外推注与持续硬膜外输注的回顾性比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Aug;32(8):1435-40. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1181619. Epub 2016 May 20.
7
Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia: the effects on maternal motor function and labor outcome. A randomized double-blind study in nulliparous women.程控间歇性硬膜外推注与连续硬膜外输注用于分娩镇痛:对产妇运动功能和分娩结局的影响。一项在初产妇中进行的随机双盲研究。
Anesth Analg. 2011 Oct;113(4):826-31. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822827b8. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
8
Effect of Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Combined With Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus on Labor Analgesia Onset and Maintenance: A Randomized Controlled Trial.硬膜外穿刺联合程控间歇硬膜外推注分娩镇痛对产程及维持的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Anesth Analg. 2021 Apr 1;132(4):971-978. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004768.
9
Programmed intermittent epidural boluses for maintenance of labor analgesia: an impact study.用于维持分娩镇痛的程序化间歇性硬膜外推注:一项影响研究。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2016 May;26:32-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
10
Continuous epidural infusion vs programmed intermittent epidural bolus for labour analgesia: a prospective, controlled, before-and-after cohort study of labour outcomes.连续硬膜外输注与程控间歇硬膜外推注用于分娩镇痛的前瞻性对照前后队列研究:分娩结局的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Aug;121(2):432-437. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.03.038. Epub 2018 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Effective Dose of Epidural Hydromorphone for Analgesia Following Caesarean Section in Using Modified Dixon Sequential Method.采用改良 Dixon 序贯法确定剖宫产术后硬膜外注射氢吗啡酮镇痛的有效剂量
J Pain Res. 2024 Nov 9;17:3671-3679. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S480917. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparison of analgesic effects between programmed intermittent epidural boluses and continuous epidural infusion after cesarean section: a randomized controlled study.剖宫产术后程控硬膜外间断推注与持续输注镇痛效果比较:一项随机对照研究。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2024 Jun;77(3):374-383. doi: 10.4097/kja.23726. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
3
Risk factors for epidural anesthesia blockade failure in cesarean section: a retrospective study.

本文引用的文献

1
Distribution of solution in the epidural space: examination by cryomicrotome section.溶液在硬膜外间隙的分布:冷冻切片检查
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002 Mar-Apr;27(2):150-6. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2002.29748.
剖宫产术硬膜外麻醉阻滞失败的危险因素:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Oct 6;23(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02284-w.
4
Analgesia after cesarean section - what is new?剖宫产术后镇痛——有哪些新进展?
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2023 Jun 1;36(3):288-292. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001259. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
5
Programmed intermittent epidural bolus in parturients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.产妇程控间歇性硬膜外推注:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Feb 4;101(5):e28742. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028742.