Suppr超能文献

急诊约束使用中的种族和民族差异:一项多中心回顾性分析。

Racial and ethnic disparities in emergency department restraint use: A multicenter retrospective analysis.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Data and Analytics Organization, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Sep;28(9):957-965. doi: 10.1111/acem.14327.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research regarding disparities in physical restraint use in the emergency department (ED) is limited. We evaluated the role of race, ethnicity, and preferred language on the application of physical restraint among ED patients held under a Massachusetts section 12(a) order for mandatory psychiatric evaluation.

METHODS

We identified all ED patient encounters with a section 12(a) order across a large integrated 11-hospital health system from January 2018 through December 2019. Information on age, race, ethnicity, preferred language, insurance, mental illness, substance use, history of homelessness, and in-network primary care provider was obtained from the electronic health record. We evaluated for differences in physical restraint use between subgroups via a mixed-effect logistic regression with random-intercept model.

RESULTS

We identified 32,054 encounters involving a section 12(a) order. Physical restraints were used in 2,458 (7.7%) encounters. Factors associated with physical restraint included male sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.28 to 1.63), Black/African American race (aOR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.48), Hispanic ethnicity (aOR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.22 to 1.73), Medicaid insurance (aOR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.39), and a diagnosis of bipolar disorder or psychotic disorder (aOR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.31 to 1.74). Across all age groups, patients who were 25 to 34 years of age were at highest risk of restraint (aOR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.69 to 2.39). Patients with a primary care provider within our network (aOR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.72 to 0.92) were at lower risk of restraint. No associations were found between restraint use and language, history of alcohol or substance use, or homelessness.

CONCLUSION

Black/African American and Hispanic patients under an involuntary mandatory emergency psychiatric evaluation hold order experience higher rates of physical restraint in the ED. Factors contributing to racial disparities in the use of physical restraint, including the potential role of structural racism and other forms of bias, merits further investigation.

摘要

背景

关于急诊科(ED)中身体约束使用差异的研究有限。我们评估了种族、族裔和首选语言在马萨诸塞州第 12(a)条强制性精神评估令下接受 ED 患者身体约束应用中的作用。

方法

我们从 2018 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月,从一个大型综合 11 家医院的医疗系统中确定了所有涉及第 12(a)条命令的 ED 患者就诊。从电子健康记录中获取年龄、种族、族裔、首选语言、保险、精神疾病、物质使用、无家可归史和网络内初级保健提供者的信息。我们通过具有随机截距模型的混合效应逻辑回归评估亚组之间身体约束使用的差异。

结果

我们确定了 32,054 次涉及第 12(a)条命令的就诊。在 2,458 次就诊中(7.7%)使用了身体约束。与身体约束相关的因素包括男性(调整后的优势比[aOR]1.44,95%置信区间[CI]1.28 至 1.63)、黑人/非裔美国人种族(aOR 1.22,95%CI 1.01 至 1.48)、西班牙裔(aOR 1.45,95%CI 1.22 至 1.73)、医疗补助保险(aOR 1.21,95%CI 1.05 至 1.39)和双相情感障碍或精神病诊断(aOR 1.51,95%CI 1.31 至 1.74)。在所有年龄组中,25 至 34 岁的患者使用约束的风险最高(aOR 2.01,95%CI 1.69 至 2.39)。在我们网络内有初级保健提供者的患者(aOR 0.81,95%CI 0.72 至 0.92)使用约束的风险较低。语言、酒精或物质使用史或无家可归与约束使用之间没有关联。

结论

在非自愿强制性紧急精神评估令下,黑人/非裔美国人和西班牙裔患者在 ED 中经历更高的身体约束率。身体约束使用方面的种族差异的促成因素,包括结构性种族主义和其他形式的偏见的潜在作用,值得进一步调查。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验