• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

危重症患者每日评估工具的开发与验证

Development and validation of a daily assessment tool for critically ill patients.

作者信息

Mahran Ghada Shalaby Khalaf, Tolba Asmaa Atiaa, Abbas Mostafa Samy, Thabet Amr Mohamed Ahmed

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing, Assiut University, Egypt.

Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Egypt.

出版信息

Nurs Crit Care. 2023 May;28(3):404-410. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12717. Epub 2021 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1111/nicc.12717
PMID:34533264
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients in intensive care units require comprehensive care. Hence, improving health care quality depends on accurate assessment and documentation.

AIM

To develop and validate the content of an assessment sheet for critically ill patients.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A Delphi design study was conducted between January and March 2020. The content validity index (CVI) was used to calculate the degree of agreement among the experts to analyse the instrument and the entire set of items. Content validity was determined by seven experts (three critical care nursing professionals, two critical care doctors, and two anaesthesiologists) using a four-point Likert scale. They evaluated the items in terms of the following: 1 = "irrelevant," 2 = "somewhat relevant if the phrasing is profoundly adjusted," 3 = "relevant with some adjustment as to phrasing," and 4 = "very relevant." The CVI was applied, and the accepted value was ≥0.50.

RESULTS

Three rounds of evaluation were required to achieve the minimum index. The items were reviewed for content and face validity. The instrument was validated with 86 items with a total CVI of 0.90, a face validity of 1, and a scale-level content validity index/universal agreement calculation method (S-CVI/UA) value of 0.813.

CONCLUSION

This instrument can help nurses, doctors, academics, and students assess patients in intensive care units.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The daily assessment tool may provide a systematic and consistent approach to critically ill patients' assessment to guide interventions.

摘要

背景

重症监护病房的患者需要全面护理。因此,提高医疗质量取决于准确的评估和记录。

目的

开发并验证危重症患者评估表的内容。

研究设计与方法

于2020年1月至3月进行了一项德尔菲设计研究。使用内容效度指数(CVI)来计算专家之间的一致程度,以分析该工具和整套项目。由七位专家(三名重症护理专业人员、两名重症医生和两名麻醉医生)采用四点李克特量表确定内容效度。他们从以下方面评估项目:1 = “不相关”,2 = “如果措辞进行大幅调整则有些相关”,3 = “相关但措辞需做一些调整”,4 = “非常相关”。应用了CVI,可接受值为≥0.50。

结果

需要三轮评估才能达到最低指数。对项目进行了内容和表面效度审查。该工具通过86个项目进行了验证,总CVI为0.90,表面效度为1,量表级内容效度指数/通用一致性计算方法(S-CVI/UA)值为0.813。

结论

该工具可帮助护士、医生、学者和学生对重症监护病房的患者进行评估。

与临床实践的相关性

日常评估工具可为危重症患者的评估提供系统且一致的方法,以指导干预措施。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a daily assessment tool for critically ill patients.危重症患者每日评估工具的开发与验证
Nurs Crit Care. 2023 May;28(3):404-410. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12717. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
2
Development and Validation of Eyes Care Bundle for Mechanically Ventilated Patients.开发和验证机械通气患者眼部护理套餐。
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2024;47(3):202-217. doi: 10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000515. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
3
Development of a Discharge Criteria Checklist for COVID-19 Patients From the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房新冠患者出院标准清单的制定
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2023;46(2):227-238. doi: 10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000455.
4
Nurses' Empowerment Scale for ICU patients' families: an instrument development study.重症监护病房患者家属的护士赋权量表:一项工具开发研究。
Nurs Crit Care. 2016 Sep;21(5):e11-21. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12106. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
5
Development and Validation of a Red Flag Prediction Model for Admission of COVID-19 Patients to the Intensive Care Unit.COVID-19患者入住重症监护病房红旗预测模型的开发与验证
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2023;46(2):217-226. doi: 10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000454.
6
Development and content validation of the Burden of Documentation for Nurses and Midwives (BurDoNsaM) survey.护士和助产士文件负担(BurDoNsaM)调查问卷的编制与内容验证。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 May;76(5):1273-1281. doi: 10.1111/jan.14320. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
7
Nursing Activity Score for estimating nursing care need in intensive care units: findings from a face and content validity study.用于评估重症监护病房护理需求的护理活动评分:一项表面效度和内容效度研究的结果
J Nurs Manag. 2016 May;24(4):549-59. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12357. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
8
Perme ICU Physical Therapy Competency: Development of an ICU Knowledge and Skills Assessment Tool.重症监护室物理治疗能力:重症监护室知识和技能评估工具的开发。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2024 Dec;85:103750. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103750. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
9
Development and validation of a new tool to identify factors that influence users' motivation toward the use of teleconsultation systems: A modified Delphi study.一种用于识别影响用户使用远程会诊系统动机因素的新工具的开发与验证:一项改良的德尔菲研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Jan;157:104618. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104618. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
10
Design and content validation of an instrument measuring user perception of the persuasive design principles in a breastfeeding mHealth app: A modified Delphi study.测量母乳喂养移动健康应用程序中用户对劝导设计原则感知的工具的设计和内容验证:一项改良德尔菲研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Aug;164:104789. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104789. Epub 2022 May 10.