School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiao, Australia.
J Adv Nurs. 2020 May;76(5):1273-1281. doi: 10.1111/jan.14320. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
To develop a validated tool to measure nursing and midwifery documentation burden.
While an important record of care, documentation can be burdensome for nurses and midwives and may remove them from direct patient care, resulting in decreased job satisfaction, associated with decreased patient satisfaction. The amount of documentation is increasing at a time where staff rationalisation results in decreasing numbers of clinicians at the bedside. No instrument is available to measure staff perceptions of the burden of clinical documentation.
Survey development, followed by rwo rounds of content validation (April and May 2019).
Based on the literature a 28 item survey, with items in 6 subscales, representing key areas of documentation burden was developed. Item (I-CVI), subscale (S-CVI/Ave by subscale) and overall content validity indexes (S-CVI/Ave) were calculated following two review rounds by an expert panel of clinical and academic nurses and midwives.
Level of agreement for the first iteration of the survey was low, with many items failing to reach the critical I-CVI threshold of 0.78. No subscale reached a S-CVI/Ave above 0.8 and the overall scale only achieved a S-CVI/Ave score of 0.67. Thirteen items were removed, seven were edited and five new items added, based on the expert panel feedback, substantially improving the content validity. All individual items achieved an I-CVI ≥0.78, the S-CVI/Ave was above 0.85 for all subscales and the total S-CVI/Ave was 0.94.
The Burden of Documentation for Nurses and Midwives (BurDoNsaM) survey can be considered as content valid, according to the content validity analysis by an expert panel.
The BurDoNsaM survey may be used by nurse leaders and researchers to measure the burden of documentation, providing the opportunity to review practice and implement strategies to decrease documentation burden, potentially improving patient satisfaction with the care received.
开发一种经过验证的工具来衡量护理和助产记录的负担。
尽管护理记录是护理工作的重要记录,但对于护士和助产士来说,记录可能会带来负担,并使他们无法直接照顾患者,从而导致工作满意度下降,进而导致患者满意度下降。在员工合理化导致床边临床医生人数减少的情况下,记录的数量却在增加。目前还没有仪器可以衡量员工对临床文件记录负担的看法。
调查开发,然后进行两轮内容验证(2019 年 4 月和 5 月)。
根据文献,开发了一个 28 项的调查,分为 6 个分量表,代表记录负担的关键领域。通过临床和学术护士和助产士专家组进行两轮审查后,计算了项目(I-CVI)、分量表(S-CVI/Ave 按分量表)和整体内容有效性指数(S-CVI/Ave)。
调查第一轮的一致性水平较低,许多项目未能达到关键的 I-CVI 阈值 0.78。没有一个分量表的 S-CVI/Ave 超过 0.8,整体量表仅达到 S-CVI/Ave 分数 0.67。根据专家组的反馈,删除了 13 个项目,编辑了 7 个项目,并添加了 5 个新项目,这大大提高了内容有效性。所有单个项目的 I-CVI 均≥0.78,所有分量表的 S-CVI/Ave 均超过 0.85,总 S-CVI/Ave 为 0.94。
根据专家组的内容有效性分析,护士和助产士记录负担(BurDoNsaM)调查可以被认为是内容有效的。
护士领导和研究人员可以使用 BurDoNsaM 调查来衡量记录的负担,为审查实践和实施减少记录负担的策略提供机会,从而提高患者对所接受护理的满意度。