• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持晚期癌症患者针对肿瘤特异性和姑息性治疗进行参与式决策的决策辅助工具的开发与评估:一项前后对照研究方案

Development and Evaluation of a Decision Aid to Support Patients' Participatory Decision-Making for Tumor-Specific and Palliative Therapy for Advanced Cancer: Protocol for a Pre-Post Study.

作者信息

Laryionava Katsiaryna, Schildmann Jan, Wensing Michael, Wedding Ullrich, Surmann Bastian, Woydack Lena, Krug Katja, Winkler Eva

机构信息

Institute for History and Ethics of Medicine, Centre for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.

Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Sep 17;10(9):e24954. doi: 10.2196/24954.

DOI:10.2196/24954
PMID:34533464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8486990/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To support advanced cancer patients and their oncologists in therapeutic decisions, we aim to develop a decision aid (DA) in a multiphased, bicentric study. The DA aims to help patients to better understand risks and benefits of the available treatment options including the options of standard palliative care or cancer-specific treatment (ie, off-label drug use within an individual treatment plan).

OBJECTIVE

This study protocol outlines the development and testing of the DA in a pre-post study targeting a heterogeneous population of advanced cancer patients.

METHODS

In the first step, we will assess patients' information and decisional needs as well as the views of the health care providers regarding the content and implementation of the DA. Through a scoping review, we aim to analyze specific characteristics of the decision-making process and to specify the treatment options, outcomes, and probabilities. An interdisciplinary research group of experts will develop and review the DA. In the second step, testing of the DA (design and field testing) with patients and oncologists will be conducted. As a last step, we will run a pre-post design study with 70 doctor-patient encounters to assess improvements on the primary study outcome: patients' level of decisional conflict. In addition, the user acceptance of all involved parties will be tested.

RESULTS

Interviews with cancer patients, oncologists, and health care providers (ie, nurses, nutritionists) as well as a literature review from phase I have been completed. The field testing is scheduled for April 2021 to August 2021, with the final revision scheduled for September 2021. The pre-post study of the DA and acceptance testing are scheduled to start in October 2021 and shall be finished in September 2022.

CONCLUSIONS

A unique feature of this study is the development of a DA for patients with different types of advanced cancer, which covers a wide range of topics relevant for patients near the end of life such as forgoing cancer-specific therapy and switching to best supportive care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04606238; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04606238.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/24954.

摘要

背景

为了在治疗决策方面为晚期癌症患者及其肿瘤学家提供支持,我们旨在通过一项多阶段、双中心研究开发一种决策辅助工具(DA)。该决策辅助工具旨在帮助患者更好地理解现有治疗方案的风险和益处,包括标准姑息治疗或癌症特异性治疗方案(即在个体治疗计划中使用未获批准的药物)。

目的

本研究方案概述了在一项针对晚期癌症患者异质性群体的前后对照研究中对该决策辅助工具的开发和测试。

方法

第一步,我们将评估患者的信息和决策需求,以及医疗保健提供者对决策辅助工具的内容和实施的看法。通过范围综述,我们旨在分析决策过程的具体特征,并明确治疗方案、结果和概率。一个跨学科专家研究小组将开发和审查该决策辅助工具。第二步,将对患者和肿瘤学家进行决策辅助工具的测试(设计和现场测试)。最后一步,我们将进行一项前后对照设计研究,涉及70次医患会诊,以评估主要研究结果的改善情况:患者的决策冲突水平。此外,还将测试所有参与方对该工具的接受程度。

结果

已完成对癌症患者、肿瘤学家和医疗保健提供者(即护士、营养师)的访谈以及第一阶段的文献综述。现场测试计划于2021年4月至2021年8月进行,最终修订计划于2021年9月进行。决策辅助工具的前后对照研究和接受度测试计划于2021年10月开始,2022年9月完成。

结论

本研究的一个独特之处在于为不同类型的晚期癌症患者开发了一种决策辅助工具,该工具涵盖了与临终患者相关的广泛主题,如放弃癌症特异性治疗并转向最佳支持性护理。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04606238;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04606238。

国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/24954。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/957b/8486990/d25b48849c6d/resprot_v10i9e24954_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/957b/8486990/d25b48849c6d/resprot_v10i9e24954_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/957b/8486990/d25b48849c6d/resprot_v10i9e24954_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Evaluation of a Decision Aid to Support Patients' Participatory Decision-Making for Tumor-Specific and Palliative Therapy for Advanced Cancer: Protocol for a Pre-Post Study.支持晚期癌症患者针对肿瘤特异性和姑息性治疗进行参与式决策的决策辅助工具的开发与评估:一项前后对照研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Sep 17;10(9):e24954. doi: 10.2196/24954.
2
An Evaluation of a Web-Based Decision Aid for Treatment Planning of Small Kidney Tumors: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的小肾肿瘤治疗规划决策辅助工具的评估:先导性随机对照试验
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Sep 2;11(9):e41451. doi: 10.2196/41451.
3
Randomized controlled trial on the effect of an online decision aid for young female cancer patients regarding fertility preservation.随机对照试验研究在线决策辅助工具对年轻女性癌症患者生育力保存的效果。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Sep 29;34(9):1726-1734. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez136.
4
Comparative Effectiveness of a Web-Based Patient Decision Aid for Therapeutic Options for Sickle Cell Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的镰状细胞病治疗方案患者决策辅助工具的比较效果:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Dec 4;21(12):e14462. doi: 10.2196/14462.
5
Development of a Decision Aid for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Involving Intensive Care Unit Patients' and Health Professionals' Participation Using User-Centered Design and a Wiki Platform for Rapid Prototyping: A Research Protocol.一项使用以用户为中心的设计和维基平台进行快速原型制作的、涉及重症监护病房患者及医护人员参与的心肺复苏决策辅助工具的开发:一项研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Feb 11;5(1):e24. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5107.
6
Realizing better doctor-patient dialogue about choices in palliative care and early phase clinical trial participation: towards an online value clarification tool (OnVaCT).实现更好的关于姑息治疗和早期临床试验参与选择的医患对话:迈向在线价值澄清工具(OnVaCT)。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Nov 29;18(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0486-6.
7
An Autonomy-Supportive Online Decision Aid to Assist Smokers in Choosing Evidence-Based Cessation Assistance: Development Process and Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial.一种支持自主性的在线决策辅助工具,以帮助吸烟者选择基于证据的戒烟援助:一项随机对照试验的开发过程与方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Dec 15;9(12):e21772. doi: 10.2196/21772.
8
9
Development and Evaluation of an Ethical Guideline for Decisions to Limit Life-Prolonging Treatment in Advanced Cancer: Protocol for a Monocentric Mixed-Method Interventional Study.晚期癌症患者延长生命治疗限制决策的伦理指南的制定与评估:一项单中心混合方法干预性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Jun 15;7(6):e157. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9698.
10
Impact of a web-based treatment decision aid for early-stage prostate cancer on shared decision-making and health outcomes: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.基于网络的早期前列腺癌治疗决策辅助工具对共同决策和健康结局的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 May 27;16:231. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0750-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of implementing a decision aid for advanced cancer patients in a comprehensive cancer centers' outpatient setting: Valuable lessons learned.在综合癌症中心门诊环境中为晚期癌症患者实施决策辅助工具的可行性:汲取的宝贵经验教训。
Cancer Med. 2024 Dec;13(24):e70127. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70127.

本文引用的文献

1
Who Needs What? Perceptions of Patients and Caregivers in Oncology Phase 1 Trials.谁需要什么?肿瘤学1期试验中患者和护理人员的认知
J Patient Exp. 2020 Feb;7(1):27-33. doi: 10.1177/2374373519830743. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
2
Realizing better doctor-patient dialogue about choices in palliative care and early phase clinical trial participation: towards an online value clarification tool (OnVaCT).实现更好的关于姑息治疗和早期临床试验参与选择的医患对话:迈向在线价值澄清工具(OnVaCT)。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Nov 29;18(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0486-6.
3
A Video Decision Aid Improves Informed Decision Making in Patients With Advanced Cancer Considering Palliative Radiation Therapy.
视频决策辅助可改善考虑姑息性放射治疗的晚期癌症患者的知情决策。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Dec;58(6):1048-1055.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.08.014. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
4
Development and validation of a patient decision aid for prostate Cancer therapy: from paternalistic towards participative shared decision making.开发和验证前列腺癌治疗患者决策辅助工具:从家长式决策向参与式共享决策转变。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jul 11;19(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0862-4.
5
Availability and effectiveness of decision aids for supporting shared decision making in patients with advanced colorectal and lung cancer: Results from a systematic review.支持晚期结直肠癌和肺癌患者共同决策的决策辅助工具的可及性和有效性:系统评价的结果。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 May;28(3):e13079. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13079. Epub 2019 May 8.
6
How Do Blood Cancer Doctors Discuss Prognosis? Findings from a National Survey of Hematologic Oncologists.血液癌症医生如何讨论预后?一项对血液肿瘤学家的全国性调查结果。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Jun;22(6):677-684. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0441. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
7
Patients' Preferences in Non-Curable Cancer Disease.癌症不可治愈患者的偏好。
Oncol Res Treat. 2019;42(1-2):31-34. doi: 10.1159/000496120. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
8
What Is the Effectiveness of Patient Decision Aids for Cancer-Related Decisions? A Systematic Review Subanalysis.患者决策辅助工具对癌症相关决策的有效性如何?一项系统评价子分析。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018 Dec;2:1-13. doi: 10.1200/CCI.17.00148.
9
Promoting shared decision making in advanced cancer: Development and piloting of a patient communication aid.促进晚期癌症的共同决策:患者沟通辅助工具的开发和试点。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 May;102(5):916-923. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.018. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
10
Informed Consent and Phase I Trials: Cognitive Failure and Additional Challenges to Informed Decision Making.知情同意与I期试验:认知缺陷及对知情决策的其他挑战
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 10;37(2):169. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01136. Epub 2018 Nov 15.