Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN), Universität Hamburg, Bundesstraße 55, 20146, Hamburg, Germany.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(8):11345-11358. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16106-4. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
The widespread presence of microplastics in multiple environmental compartments has largely been demonstrated. Assessing the ecological risk that microplastics pose is, at the present stage, hindered due to methodical differences. Moreover, different methods hamper meaningful comparisons between studies and data on microplastics <300 μm is scarce. Therefore, we focused on microplastics >20 μm in freshwater and sampling-related aspects in this concern. Sampling was conducted between 2018 and 2020 in the Tollense catchment in northeastern Germany and was carried out by in situ pump filtration. Two different sampling systems (cutoff sizes 20 μm and 63 μm) were applied to filter water volumes of 0.075-1.836 m. Retained particles were analyzed by a combination of Nile red staining and micro-Raman spectroscopy. Thereby, we found microplastic concentrations between 123 and 1728 particles m using the 63-μm cut-off size and between 1357 and 2146 particles m using the 20-μm cut-off size. Local hydrodynamics (discharge and flow velocity) and land cover are likely influencing the observed microplastic concentrations and fluxes. The variability between both sampling systems cannot fully be explained by the different mesh sizes used. We argue that differentiation between a theoretical cut-off size (finest mesh) and a factual cut-off size (reliable quantification) can help to understand sampling related differences between studies.
微塑料广泛存在于多种环境介质中,这一点已得到充分证实。在现阶段,由于方法上的差异,评估微塑料所构成的生态风险受到阻碍。此外,不同的方法阻碍了研究之间进行有意义的比较,并且<300μm的微塑料数据也很匮乏。因此,我们关注的是淡水环境中>20μm的微塑料以及相关采样问题。本研究于 2018 年至 2020 年在德国东北部的托尔伦塞流域进行采样,采用原位泵过滤法采集水样。我们使用了两种不同的采样系统(截留尺寸分别为 20μm 和 63μm),过滤了 0.075-1.836m3 的水样。保留下来的颗粒通过尼罗红染色和微拉曼光谱分析进行联合分析。使用 63μm 截留尺寸,我们发现微塑料浓度在 123 至 1728 个颗粒/m3 之间;而使用 20μm 截留尺寸,浓度在 1357 至 2146 个颗粒/m3 之间。当地水动力(流量和流速)和土地覆盖可能影响观测到的微塑料浓度和通量。两种采样系统之间的差异不能完全用所使用的不同网眼尺寸来解释。我们认为,区分理论截留尺寸(最细网眼)和实际截留尺寸(可靠定量)有助于理解研究之间采样相关的差异。