Bertels Lucinda, Knottnerus Bart, Bastiaans Lottie, Danquah Augustina, van Henk, Dekker Evelien, van Kristel
Department of General Practice, Cancer Center Amsterdam and Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Socio-Medical Sciences, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Psychooncology. 2022 Feb;31(2):245-252. doi: 10.1002/pon.5814. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
To explore worry and decision-making processes used by faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-positive participants in the Dutch national screening programme for colorectal cancer.
A mixed-methods study consisting of 22 semi-structured interviews in FIT-positive participants who underwent the recommended colonoscopy within 4-6 months after the FIT result, followed by a widespread questionnaire in a larger target population (N = 1495).
In the interviews, we recognised two different decision-making processes. The first is an affective heuristic decision process where the decision to participate is made instantly and is paired with high-risk perception, worry and (severe) emotional turmoil. The second is a more time-consuming analytical decision process in which participants describe discussing options with others. In the questionnaire, high levels of cancer worry (CWS > 9) were reported by 34% of respondents. Decisional difficulties were reported by 15% of respondents, and 34% of respondents reported discussing the positive FIT result with their GP. Individuals with high levels of cancer worry contacted their GP less often than those with low levels.
The Dutch two-step screening programme may result in high levels of cancer worry in a non-cancer population. More research is needed to monitor worry and its role in decision-making in cancer screening, as well as ways to facilitate decision-making for participants.
探讨荷兰全国结直肠癌筛查项目中粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)呈阳性的参与者的担忧情绪及决策过程。
采用混合方法研究,对22名FIT呈阳性且在FIT结果出来后的4至6个月内接受了推荐结肠镜检查的参与者进行半结构化访谈,随后在更大的目标人群(N = 1495)中开展广泛的问卷调查。
在访谈中,我们识别出两种不同的决策过程。第一种是情感启发式决策过程,即立即做出参与决策,并伴有高风险认知、担忧和(严重的)情绪波动。第二种是耗时更长的分析性决策过程,参与者描述了与他人讨论各种选择的情况。在问卷调查中,34%的受访者报告有高度的癌症担忧(癌症担忧量表得分>9)。15%的受访者报告有决策困难,34%的受访者报告与他们的家庭医生讨论了FIT阳性结果。癌症担忧程度高的个体比担忧程度低的个体更少联系他们的家庭医生。
荷兰的两步筛查项目可能会在非癌症人群中导致高度的癌症担忧。需要更多研究来监测担忧情绪及其在癌症筛查决策中的作用,以及促进参与者决策的方法。