• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌筛查中粪便免疫化学检测阳性后的心理困扰和生活质量。

Psychological distress and quality of life following positive fecal occult blood testing in colorectal cancer screening.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Groene Hart ziekenhuis, Gouda, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychooncology. 2020 Jun;29(6):1084-1091. doi: 10.1002/pon.5381. Epub 2020 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1002/pon.5381
PMID:32237002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7317528/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess psychological functioning, quality of life, and regret about screening after a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and subsequent colonoscopy, and to evaluate changes over time.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study. Individuals aged 55 to 75 with a positive FIT that were referred for colonoscopy between July 2017 and November 2018, were invited to complete questionnaires related to psychological distress and health-related quality of life at three predefined time points: before colonoscopy, after histopathology result notification, and after 6 months. Four questionnaires were used: the Psychological Consequences Questionnaire (PCQ), the six-item Cancer Worry Scale (CWS), the Decision Regret Scale (DRS), and the 36-item Short-Form (SF-36).

RESULTS

A total of 1066 participants out of 2151 eligible individuals were included. Patients with cancer showed a significant increase in psychological dysfunction (P = .01) and cancer worry (P = .008) after colonoscopy result notification, and a decline to pre-colonoscopy measurements after 6 months. In the no-cancer groups, psychological dysfunction and cancer worry significantly decreased over time (P < .05) but there was no ongoing decline. After 6 months, 17% of participants with no cancer experienced high level of cancer worry (CWS ≥ 10). Yet, only 5% reported high level of regret about screening participation (DRS > 25). A good global quality of life was reported in participants with no cancer.

CONCLUSION

Some psychological distress remains up to 6 months after colonoscopy in participants who tested false-positive in the Dutch bowel cancer screening program.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)阳性后行结肠镜检查的人群的心理功能、生活质量和对筛查的后悔程度,并评估其随时间的变化。

方法

这是一项前瞻性队列研究。2017 年 7 月至 2018 年 11 月期间,对接受结肠镜检查的年龄在 55 至 75 岁之间、FIT 阳性的个体进行前瞻性队列研究,邀请他们在三个预先设定的时间点(结肠镜检查前、组织病理学结果通知后和 6 个月后)完成与心理困扰和健康相关生活质量相关的问卷。使用了四个问卷:心理后果问卷(PCQ)、六项目癌症担忧量表(CWS)、决策后悔量表(DRS)和 36 项简明健康调查问卷(SF-36)。

结果

在 2151 名符合条件的个体中,共有 1066 名参与者被纳入。在结肠镜检查结果通知后,患有癌症的患者表现出明显的心理功能障碍(P =.01)和癌症担忧(P =.008)增加,6 个月后降至结肠镜检查前的测量值。在无癌症组中,心理功能障碍和癌症担忧随时间显著下降(P <.05),但没有持续下降。6 个月后,17%的无癌症参与者出现高水平的癌症担忧(CWS≥10)。然而,只有 5%的人报告对筛查参与有高度的后悔(DRS>25)。无癌症参与者报告的总体生活质量良好。

结论

在荷兰结直肠癌筛查项目中,FIT 假阳性的参与者在结肠镜检查后 6 个月内仍存在一些心理困扰。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5c5/7317528/4fcf39a83229/PON-29-1084-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5c5/7317528/4ad8a1e3097a/PON-29-1084-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5c5/7317528/4fcf39a83229/PON-29-1084-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5c5/7317528/4ad8a1e3097a/PON-29-1084-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5c5/7317528/4fcf39a83229/PON-29-1084-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychological distress and quality of life following positive fecal occult blood testing in colorectal cancer screening.结直肠癌筛查中粪便免疫化学检测阳性后的心理困扰和生活质量。
Psychooncology. 2020 Jun;29(6):1084-1091. doi: 10.1002/pon.5381. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
2
FIT false-positives in colorectal cancer screening experience psychological distress up to 6 weeks after colonoscopy.在结直肠癌筛查中,粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)假阳性会导致患者在结肠镜检查后长达 6 周经历心理困扰。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Oct;21(10):2809-15. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1867-7. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
3
Psychological effects of colorectal cancer screening: Participants individuals not invited.结直肠癌筛查的心理影响:未被邀请的参与者个体
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov 21;22(43):9631-9641. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i43.9631.
4
Decision-making in screening positive participants who follow up with colonoscopy in the Dutch colorectal cancer screening programme: A mixed-method study.荷兰结直肠癌筛查项目中对结肠镜检查随访的筛查阳性参与者的决策:一项混合方法研究。
Psychooncology. 2022 Feb;31(2):245-252. doi: 10.1002/pon.5814. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
5
Patients' Preferences for Primary Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Survey of the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Korea.患者对原发性结直肠癌筛查的偏好:韩国国家结直肠癌筛查计划的调查。
Gut Liver. 2017 Nov 15;11(6):821-827. doi: 10.5009/gnl17025.
6
The psychological impact of being offered surveillance colonoscopy following attendance at colorectal screening using flexible sigmoidoscopy.在接受乙状结肠镜检查进行结直肠癌筛查后,被建议进行监测性结肠镜检查的心理影响。
J Med Screen. 2009;16(3):124-30. doi: 10.1258/jms.2009.009041.
7
Do no harm: no psychological harm from colorectal cancer screening.勿施伤害:结直肠癌筛查无心理伤害。
Br J Cancer. 2016 Mar 1;114(5):497-504. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.14. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
8
Associations of perceived risk and cancer worry for colorectal cancer with screening behaviour.对结直肠癌的感知风险和癌症担忧与筛查行为的关联。
J Health Psychol. 2018 May;23(6):840-852. doi: 10.1177/1359105316679721. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
9
The psychological impact of participating in colorectal cancer screening by faecal immuno-chemical testing--the Australian experience.粪便免疫化学检测筛查结直肠癌对参与者心理的影响——澳大利亚的经验。
Br J Cancer. 2014 Aug 26;111(5):970-5. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.371. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
10
Psychological distress after a positive fecal occult blood test result among members of an integrated healthcare delivery system.综合医疗服务系统成员中阳性粪便潜血检测结果后的心理困扰。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Jan;23(1):154-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0722. Epub 2013 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Sociodemographic factors associated with psychosocial consequences of false-positive colorectal cancer screening: a prospective cohort study.与结直肠癌假阳性筛查心理社会后果相关的社会人口学因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 May 16;15(5):e090967. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090967.
2
Factors associated with false fecal immunochemical test results in colorectal cancer screening.结直肠癌筛查中与粪便免疫化学检测结果假阳性相关的因素。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 Apr 15;17(4):101487. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i4.101487.
3
Costs of colorectal cancer screening in Sweden: an observational, longitudinal cost description.

本文引用的文献

1
Incidence of Interval Colorectal Cancer After Negative Results From First-Round Fecal Immunochemical Screening Tests, by Cutoff Value and Participant Sex and Age.第一轮粪便免疫化学筛选试验阴性结果后间隔期结直肠癌的发生率,按截止值和参与者的性别及年龄划分。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jun;18(7):1493-1500. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.021. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
2
Psychosocial consequences of receiving false-positive colorectal cancer screening results: a qualitative study.接受结直肠癌症筛查假阳性结果的心理社会后果:一项定性研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Jun;37(2):145-154. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1608040. Epub 2019 May 11.
3
瑞典结直肠癌筛查的成本:一项观察性纵向成本描述。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec 18;11(1):e001574. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001574.
4
Adaptation and Validation of the Psychological Consequences of Screening Questionnaire (PCQ) for Cognitive Screening in Primary Care.适应和验证心理后果的筛选问卷 (PCQ) 的认知筛查在初级保健。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Nov;44(8):914-926. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241275676. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
5
Impact of colonoscopy on health-related quality of life: findings from the RECEDE study.结肠镜检查对健康相关生活质量的影响:RECEDE 研究结果。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Jun 26;22(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02262-x.
6
Attitudes and health behaviors of middle-aged and older adults with elevated tumor markers in China.中国肿瘤标志物升高的中老年人的态度和健康行为。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 6;15:1265648. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1265648. eCollection 2024.
7
Health utility assessments in individuals undergoing diagnostic and surveillance colonoscopy: improved discrimination with a cancer-specific scale.在接受诊断性和监测性结肠镜检查的个体中进行健康效用评估:使用癌症特异性量表可提高区分度。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Feb;35(2):347-357. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01789-6. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
8
Methodological Quality of PROMs in Psychosocial Consequences of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.结直肠癌筛查心理社会后果中患者报告结局测量指标的方法学质量:一项系统评价
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2023 Mar 14;14:31-47. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S394247. eCollection 2023.
9
Subsequent participation in organized FIT based screening following screen-derived colonoscopy .在因筛查进行结肠镜检查后,后续参与基于粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)的有组织筛查。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Feb 3;32:102125. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102125. eCollection 2023 Apr.
10
The psychological impact of esophageal cancer screening on anxiety and depression in China.食管癌筛查对中国焦虑和抑郁的心理影响。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 20;13:933678. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.933678. eCollection 2022.
Are anxiety levels associated with the decision to participate in a Swedish colorectal cancer screening programme? A nationwide cross-sectional study.
焦虑水平是否与参与瑞典结直肠癌筛查计划的决定有关?一项全国性的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 22;8(12):e025109. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025109.
4
Towards the validation of a new, blended theoretical model of fear of cancer recurrence.旨在验证一种新的、混合的癌症复发恐惧理论模型。
Psychooncology. 2018 Nov;27(11):2594-2601. doi: 10.1002/pon.4880. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
5
Re-validation and screening capacity of the 6-item version of the Cancer Worry Scale.癌症担忧量表 6 项版本的再验证和筛查能力。
Psychooncology. 2018 Nov;27(11):2609-2615. doi: 10.1002/pon.4782. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
6
Psychosocial impact of undergoing prostate cancer screening for men with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.BRCA1 或 BRCA2 基因突变男性进行前列腺癌筛查的心理社会影响。
BJU Int. 2019 Feb;123(2):284-292. doi: 10.1111/bju.14412. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
7
New diagnostic tests: more harm than good.新的诊断测试:弊大于利。
BMJ. 2017 Jul 18;358:j3314. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3314.
8
Longitudinal regret after treatment for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.低危和中危前列腺癌治疗后的长期遗憾。
Cancer. 2017 Nov 1;123(21):4252-4258. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30841. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
9
A systematic review of the psychological impact of false-positive colorectal cancer screening: What is the role of the general practitioner?结直肠癌筛查假阳性结果的心理影响系统评价:全科医生的作用是什么?
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 May;26(3). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12709. Epub 2017 May 11.
10
Fear of cancer recurrence: a significant concern among partners of prostate cancer survivors.对癌症复发的恐惧:前列腺癌幸存者伴侣中的一个重大担忧。
Psychooncology. 2017 Dec;26(12):2079-2085. doi: 10.1002/pon.4423. Epub 2017 Apr 17.