Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, Università degli Studi di Padova, Via Marzolo 1, 35131, Padova, Italy.
Department of Theoretical Chemistry, Amsterdam Institute of Molecular and Life Sciences (AIMMS), Amsterdam Center for Multiscale Modeling (ACMM), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1083, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
ChemMedChem. 2021 Dec 14;16(24):3763-3771. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.202100546. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
The reactivity of phenothiazine (PS), phenoselenazine (PSE), and phenotellurazine (PTE) with different reactive oxygen species (ROS) has been studied using density functional theory (DFT) in combination with the QM-ORSA (Quantum Mechanics-based Test for Overall Free Radical Scavenging Activity) protocol for an accurate kinetic rate calculation. Four radical scavenging mechanisms have been screened, namely hydrogen atom transfer (HAT), radical adduct formation (RAF), single electron transfer (SET), and the direct oxidation of the chalcogen atom. The chosen ROS are HO , HOO , and CH OO . PS, PSE, and PTE exhibit an excellent antioxidant activity in water regardless of the ROS due to their characteristic diffusion-controlled regime processes. For the HO radical, the primary active reaction mechanism is, for all antioxidants, RAF. But, for HOO and CH OO , the dominant mechanism strongly depends on the antioxidant: HAT for PS and PSE, and SET for PTE. The scavenging efficiency decreases dramatically in lipid environment and remains only significant (via RAF) for the most reactive radical (HO ). Therefore, PS, PSE, and PTE are excellent antioxidant molecules, especially in aqueous, physiological environments where they are active against a broad spectrum of harmful radicals. There is no advantage or significant difference in the scavenging efficiency when changing the chalcogen since the reactivity mainly derives from the amino hydrogen and the aromatic sites.
采用密度泛函理论(DFT)结合 QM-ORSA(基于量子力学的整体自由基清除活性测试)方法对吩噻嗪(PS)、吩硒嗪(PSE)和吩碲嗪(PTE)与不同活性氧物种(ROS)的反应性进行了研究,以进行准确的动力学速率计算。筛选了四种自由基清除机制,分别是氢原子转移(HAT)、自由基加合物形成(RAF)、单电子转移(SET)和硫属原子的直接氧化。所选的 ROS 是 HO·、HOO·和 CH OO·。由于其特征的扩散控制过程,PS、PSE 和 PTE 在水中无论 ROS 如何都表现出极好的抗氧化活性。对于 HO·自由基,所有抗氧化剂的主要活性反应机制都是 RAF。但是,对于 HOO·和 CH OO·,主导机制强烈取决于抗氧化剂:PS 和 PSE 为 HAT,而 PTE 为 SET。在脂质环境中,清除效率急剧下降,只有最具反应性的自由基(HO·)仍然具有显著的清除效率(通过 RAF)。因此,PS、PSE 和 PTE 是极好的抗氧化分子,特别是在水相、生理环境中,它们对广泛的有害自由基具有活性。由于反应性主要源于氨基氢和芳基位点,因此在改变硫属元素时,清除效率没有优势或显著差异。