School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
King Fahd Specialist Hospital, Burydah, AlQassim, Saudi Arabia.
Rheumatol Int. 2022 Nov;42(11):2027-2037. doi: 10.1007/s00296-021-04985-2. Epub 2021 Sep 18.
The Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) has subsidised biological therapy since 2003. We investigated the association between biological therapy for RA hospitalisation rates and health-care costs.Hospital admissions for RA patients between 1995 and 2014 were identified in the Western Australia (WA) Hospital Morbidity Data Collection (ICD codes 714 and M05.00-M06.99). State-specific dispensing data for conventional and biological therapies for RA was obtained from Statistics Australia and expressed as defined daily doses/1000 population/day (DDD) using WA population census. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to determine the relationship between DMARDs use and hospital admission rates.A total of 17,125 patients had 50,353 admissions with a diagnostic code for RA. Between 1995 and 2002, the number of RA admissions fell from 7.9 to 2.6/1000 admissions, while conventional therapy use rose from 1.45 to 1.84 DDD. Between 2003 and 2014, RA admissions decreased further to 1.9/1000 hospital admissions, while conventional therapy use increased to 2.19 DDD and biological therapy from 0.01 to 1.0 DDD. In PCA, conventional and biological therapies use had an inverse relationship with hospital admission rates. Annual costs of biological therapy utilisation was 22.5 million in 2003-2014, while the annual cost saving of RA hospital admissions was 9.2 million.The increased use of conventional therapy use for RA has coincided with a significant decline in hospital admissions for RA patients in WA, while a more modest further decline followed biological therapy introduction. Biological therapy was not as cost-effective as conventional in relation to RA hospital admissions costs.
自 2003 年以来,澳大利亚药品福利计划(PBS)一直为生物疗法提供补贴。我们研究了生物疗法治疗 RA 的住院率与医疗保健费用之间的关联。在西澳大利亚州(WA)医院发病率数据收集(ICD 代码 714 和 M05.00-M06.99)中,确定了 1995 年至 2014 年期间 RA 患者的住院情况。从澳大利亚统计局获得了 RA 常规和生物治疗的特定州分配数据,并使用 WA 人口普查数据表示为每 1000 人/天的定义日剂量(DDD)。主成分分析(PCA)用于确定 DMARD 使用与住院率之间的关系。共有 17125 名患者有 50353 次 RA 诊断住院,1995 年至 2002 年,RA 住院人数从每 1000 次住院 7.9 次降至 2.6 次,而常规治疗使用率从 1.45 次增加至 1.84 DDD。2003 年至 2014 年,RA 住院人数进一步下降至每 1000 次住院 1.9 次,而常规治疗使用率增加至 2.19 DDD,生物治疗从 0.01 次增加至 1.0 DDD。在 PCA 中,常规和生物治疗的使用与住院率呈反比。2003-2014 年生物治疗使用率的年成本为 2250 万澳元,而 RA 住院费用的年节省额为 920 万澳元。RA 常规治疗使用率的增加与西澳大利亚州 RA 患者住院人数的显著下降同时发生,而生物治疗的引入则导致了更为适度的进一步下降。与 RA 住院费用相比,生物疗法在治疗 RA 方面的成本效益并不高。