• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

过去二十年气候变化下华北地区水安全的多尺度评估。

Multi-scale assessment of water security under climate change in North China in the past two decades.

机构信息

College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.

College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jan 20;805:150103. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150103. Epub 2021 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150103
PMID:34537689
Abstract

Climate change is projected to affect the hydrological cycles in China, while the effects are expected to vary spatiotemporally. Understanding the variations in water security conditions and their sensitivity to climatic variables is crucial for assessing regional ecosystem responses to climate change. In the present study, we estimated the water yield capacity, an important indicator of water security in North China (NC), at a spatial resolution of 1 km during the last two decades based on the Budyko framework and quantified the sensitivity of water yield change to climate change among different vegetation types. The results showed that the performances of the Budyko framework were reliable both at the pixel scale and across large watersheds. The annual water yield in North China was estimated to be 7.61 ± 2.67 ∗ 10 m/yr, with an average mean water yield (MWY) of 49.51 ± 17.49 mm/yr. The spatial pattern of mean water yield change (MWYC) exhibited high heterogeneity; 46% of the study region was dominated by an increasing trend, while 9.84% was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Compared with temperature, the water yield capacity was more sensitive to precipitation variation. A consistent trend of variation was found in cropland between water yield and precipitation, while negative sensitivity coefficients were found in natural vegetation types. The variation in sensitivity coefficients (Swyp) in natural vegetation showed that in regions with a decrease in precipitation, the variation in water yield capacity also decreased, while in regions with an increase in precipitation from 0 to 8 mm/yr, the water yield capacity first decreased and then increased with precipitation. Our findings suggest that grass and shrubs would be more beneficial to regional water security in North China's revegetation, while afforestation would provide protection for the regional environment from extreme rainfall events.

摘要

气候变化预计将影响中国的水文循环,而这些影响预计将在时空上有所不同。了解水安全状况的变化及其对气候变量的敏感性对于评估区域生态系统对气候变化的响应至关重要。在本研究中,我们基于 Budyko 框架,以 1km 的空间分辨率估算了过去二十年中国北方(NC)的水资源量(衡量水安全的一个重要指标),并量化了不同植被类型下水资源量变化对气候变化的敏感性。结果表明,Budyko 框架在像素尺度和大流域尺度上的性能都很可靠。中国北方的年水资源量估计为 7.61±2.67∗10m/yr,平均多年平均水资源量(MWY)为 49.51±17.49mm/yr。多年平均水资源量变化(MWYC)的空间格局表现出高度的异质性;研究区的 46%以增加趋势为主,而 9.84%在统计上显著(P<0.05)。与温度相比,水资源量对降水变化的敏感性更高。在耕地中,发现了水资源量和降水之间一致的变化趋势,而在自然植被类型中则发现了负的敏感性系数。自然植被中敏感性系数(Swyp)的变化表明,在降水减少的地区,水资源量变化能力也随之下降,而在降水从 0 增加到 8mm/yr 的地区,水资源量变化能力先是随着降水的增加而减少,然后随着降水的增加而增加。我们的研究结果表明,在北方地区的植被恢复中,草地和灌木将更有利于区域水安全,而造林将为区域环境提供抵御极端降雨事件的保护。

相似文献

1
Multi-scale assessment of water security under climate change in North China in the past two decades.过去二十年气候变化下华北地区水安全的多尺度评估。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jan 20;805:150103. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150103. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
2
Four decades of hydrological response to vegetation dynamics and anthropogenic factors in the Three-North Region of China and Mongolia.四十年来中国三北地区和蒙古国的水文响应对植被动态和人为因素的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jan 20;857(Pt 2):159546. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159546. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
3
Spatiotemporal variations in evapotranspiration and its influencing factors in the semiarid Hailar river basin, Northern China.中国北方半干旱海拉尔河流域蒸散发时空变化及其影响因素。
Environ Res. 2022 Sep;212(Pt B):113275. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113275. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
4
The role of climate change and vegetation greening on the variation of terrestrial evapotranspiration in northwest China's Qilian Mountains.气候变化和植被绿化对中国西北祁连山陆面蒸散变化的作用。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Mar 10;759:143532. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143532. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
5
Spatial-temporal variations of terrestrial evapotranspiration across China from 2000 to 2019.2000年至2019年中国陆地蒸散量的时空变化
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jun 15;825:153951. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153951. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
6
An extended time-varying Budyko framework for quantifying the hydrological effect of vegetation restoration under climate variations at watershed scale.一种扩展的时变布迪科框架,用于量化流域尺度气候变化下植被恢复的水文效应。
Environ Res. 2024 Jun 15;251(Pt 2):118730. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118730. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
7
Effects of Climate Change on Land Cover Change and Vegetation Dynamics in Xinjiang, China.气候变化对中国新疆土地覆盖变化和植被动态的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 6;17(13):4865. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134865.
8
Quantifying impacts of climate dynamics and land-use changes on water yield service in the agro-pastoral ecotone of northern China.量化气候动态和土地利用变化对中国北方农牧交错带产水服务的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 25;809:151153. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151153. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
9
Ecosystem Evapotranspiration as a Response to Climate and Vegetation Coverage Changes in Northwest Yunnan, China.中国云南西北部生态系统蒸散对气候和植被覆盖变化的响应
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 3;10(8):e0134795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134795. eCollection 2015.
10
Monitoring responses of vegetation phenology and productivity to extreme climatic conditions using remote sensing across different sub-regions of China.利用遥感技术监测中国不同次区域植被物候和生产力对极端气候条件的响应。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jan;28(3):3644-3659. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10769-1. Epub 2020 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Rainfall on Aquatic Nitrogen and Phosphorus in a Semi-Humid Area Catchment, Northern China.降雨对中国北方半湿润地区流域水体内氮磷的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 2;19(17):10962. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710962.