Foley Elise, Breit Shelby, Marsh Courtney, Ault Kevin, Lydic Michael
University of Kansas School of Medicine-Salina, Salina, KS.
Center for Advanced Reproductive Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.
Kans J Med. 2021 Sep 1;14(3):215-219. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol1415205. eCollection 2021.
Studies of anti-vaccine attitudes in the perinatal time period previously have not paid special attention to the MMR and varicella vaccines. Because both contain live attenuated virus, a contraindication during pregnancy, it is important to assess barriers to vaccination clinically during preconception to avoid the known fetal morbidity associated with congenital rubella or varicella infection.
The primary outcome of this study was to determine prevalence of patients with nonimmune status for rubella and varicella in the setting of advanced reproductive care. Secondary outcomes of interest included further understanding nonimmune reproductive-aged women's attitudes toward MMR and varicella vaccination during preconception. Patient records with laboratory orders for rubella or varicella immunoglobulin titers, placed at the KU Advanced Reproductive Care clinic between January 2017 and June 2020, were reviewed (n = 2,217). A cross-sectional survey was administered to patients with a laboratory reported negative titer result.
Prevalence of nonimmunity to either rubella or varicella represented 6.0% (n = 134) and 3.8% (n = 85) of records, respectively; nineteen records (0.6%) demonstrated nonimmunity to both. The women who did not receive recommended vaccines following a non-immune titer result (n = 19) most commonly cited their rationale was to not delay fertility treatment further (n = 8), a requirement when receiving live attenuated virus vaccines.
The prevalence of nonimmune persons in the study population fell within the range recognized to be sufficient for herd immunity. The majority of survey respondents indicated that CDC recommended vaccinations were of high personal importance, with strong congruence of thought among those who answered in favor of vaccines when posed with several true or false statements about personal beliefs and vaccine efficacy. The risk/benefit analysis of postponing fertility treatment to achieve adequate levels of immunity should be a focused discussion when establishing fertility treatment goals with patients in the setting of advanced reproductive care.
以往围产期抗疫苗态度的研究并未特别关注麻疹、腮腺炎、风疹联合疫苗(MMR)和水痘疫苗。由于这两种疫苗都含有减毒活病毒,孕期禁用,因此在孕前临床评估疫苗接种的障碍很重要,以避免与先天性风疹或水痘感染相关的已知胎儿发病率。
本研究的主要结果是确定在高级生殖保健环境中风疹和水痘无免疫状态患者的患病率。感兴趣的次要结果包括进一步了解未免疫的育龄妇女在孕前对MMR和水痘疫苗接种的态度。回顾了2017年1月至2020年6月期间在堪萨斯大学高级生殖保健诊所进行风疹或水痘免疫球蛋白滴度实验室检查的患者记录(n = 2217)。对实验室报告滴度结果为阴性的患者进行了横断面调查。
风疹或水痘无免疫力的患病率分别占记录的6.0%(n = 134)和3.8%(n = 85);19份记录(0.6%)显示对两者均无免疫力。在滴度结果为非免疫后未接种推荐疫苗的女性(n = 19)最常提到的理由是不想进一步推迟生育治疗(n = 8),这是接种减毒活病毒疫苗时的一项要求。
研究人群中无免疫者的患病率处于公认的足以实现群体免疫的范围内。大多数调查受访者表示,美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)推荐的疫苗对个人非常重要,在就个人信仰和疫苗效力的几个真假陈述进行回答时,支持疫苗接种的人之间思想高度一致。在高级生殖保健环境中与患者确定生育治疗目标时,应重点讨论推迟生育治疗以达到足够免疫水平的风险/效益分析。