McDermott David M, Singh Sarah A, Renz Paul B, Hasan Shaakir, Weir Josh
Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, USA.
Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, USA.
Cureus. 2021 Aug 16;13(8):e17233. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17233. eCollection 2021 Aug.
Purpose/objectives Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation and surgical resection in rectal cancer, known as total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), is associated with improved pathologic complete response (pCR) rates. The National Cancer Database was utilized to identify factors associated with pCR and survival following treatment with TNT compared to standard neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). Materials/methods The National Cancer Database was queried from 2004 to 2015 for patients with locally advanced, non-metastatic rectal cancer. We identified 16,299 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation followed by definitive surgical resection. Patients were stratified by treatment received, either TNT (n=350) or nCRT (n=15,949). Multivariate binomial regression analysis and propensity matching were used to evaluate predictors of pCR. Kaplan-Meier and Cox multivariate analysis of survival were performed. Results Median follow-up was 38 months vs 53 months in the TNT vs nCRT groups, respectively. There were more patients with T4 or node-positive disease in the TNT group. There was a trend towards improved pCR in the TNT group (p=0.053). Patients achieving pCR had improved 5-year overall survival (OS) of 85.1%. The 5-year OS was not improved for TNT (76.2%) over nCRT (69.9%) (p=0.19). Pelvic nodal pCR was significantly higher in the TNT group (72%). When stratified by clinical stage, patients with cT3 (p=0.038) or cN1 (p=0.049) disease had improved OS with TNT. Conclusions Compared to nCRT, TNT is correlated with higher rates of complete pelvic nodal clearance in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma. The use of TNT showed improved survival in patients with cT3 and cN1 disease, indicating a potential benefit for patients with less advanced disease.
目的/目标 直肠癌患者先接受诱导化疗,然后进行放化疗及手术切除,即全新辅助治疗(TNT),与病理完全缓解(pCR)率提高相关。利用国家癌症数据库确定与TNT治疗后pCR及生存相关的因素,并与标准新辅助放化疗(nCRT)进行比较。材料/方法 检索2004年至2015年国家癌症数据库中局部晚期、非转移性直肠癌患者。我们确定了16299例接受新辅助化疗和放疗后进行根治性手术切除的患者。患者按接受的治疗分层,即TNT组(n = 350)或nCRT组(n = 15949)。采用多变量二项式回归分析和倾向匹配法评估pCR的预测因素。进行Kaplan-Meier生存分析和Cox多变量生存分析。结果 TNT组和nCRT组的中位随访时间分别为38个月和53个月。TNT组中T4期或淋巴结阳性疾病患者更多。TNT组有pCR改善的趋势(p = 0.053)。达到pCR的患者5年总生存率(OS)提高至85.1%。TNT组的5年OS(76.2%)相比nCRT组(69.9%)未改善(p = 0.19)。TNT组盆腔淋巴结pCR显著更高(72%)。按临床分期分层时,cT3期(p = 0.038)或cN1期(p = 0.049)疾病患者接受TNT治疗后OS改善。结论 与nCRT相比,TNT与局部晚期直肠腺癌患者更高的盆腔淋巴结完全清除率相关。TNT的使用在cT3期和cN1期疾病患者中显示出生存改善,表明对疾病程度较轻的患者有潜在益处。