Margulis Roman, Francis Jacquelyn, Tischenkel Bryan, Bromberg Adam, Pedulla Domenic, Grtisenko Karina, Cornett Elyse M, Kaye Alan D, Imani Farnad, Imani Farsad, Shaparin Naum, Vydyanathan Amaresh
Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Jul 4;11(3):e117020. doi: 10.5812/aapm.117020. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Interscalene block is one of the popular methods for decreasing pain and analgesic consumption after shoulder arthroscopic surgeries.
The objective is to compare the analgesic duration of effects of dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone as adjuvants to 0.5% ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided interscalene blocks for arthroscopic shoulder surgery in an ambulatory setting.
In this randomized controlled trial, 117 adult patients candidate for ambulatory arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anesthesia were divided into three groups to perform an ultra-sound guided interscalene block before the surgery. The ropivacaine (control) group received ropivacaine 0.5% 20 mL, group Dexamethasone received ropivacaine 0.5% 20 mL plus 4mg dexamethasone, and group dexmedetomidine received ropivacaine 0.5% 20 mL plus 75 mcg of dexmedetomidine. Time to return of sensory function, of motor function, of first pain sensation, amount of opioid medication consumed at 24 hours and 48 hours post-operatively were measured.
The 24-hour median (25th- 75th percentile) opioid consumption in morphine equivalents was similar between groups 22.5 mg (10 - 30), 15 mg (0 - 30), and 15 mg (0 - 20.6) in the ropivacaine, dexmedetomidine, and dexamethasone groups, respectively (P = 0.130). The median (25th- 75th percentile) 48 hours post-operatively, the median opioid consumption in morphine equivalents was 40 mg (25 - 67.5) in the ropivacaine group, 30 mg (22 - 50.6) in the dexamethasone group, and 52.5 mg (30 - 75) in the dexmedetomidine group (P = 0.278). The median 24-hour pain scores were 6 (5 - 8) in the ropivacaine control group, 7 (5.5 - 8) in the dexamethasone group, and 7 (4 - 9) in the dexmedetomidine group (P = 0.573).
There was no statistical difference in opioid consumption at 24 and 48 hours post-operatively when comparing dexmedetomidine, dexamethasone, and no adjuvant. However, intraoperative opioid use was significantly lower with dexmedetomidine compared to dexamethasone and plain 0.5% ropivacaine. The safe side effect profile of dexmedetomidine makes it a reasonable alternative as an adjuvant for peripheral nerve blockade when dexamethasone use may be contraindicated.
肌间沟阻滞是减轻肩关节镜手术后疼痛和减少镇痛药物用量的常用方法之一。
比较右美托咪定和地塞米松作为辅助药物与0.5%罗哌卡因用于门诊肩关节镜手术超声引导下肌间沟阻滞的镇痛持续时间。
在这项随机对照试验中,117例拟行全身麻醉下门诊肩关节镜手术的成年患者被分为三组,在手术前进行超声引导下肌间沟阻滞。罗哌卡因(对照组)组接受20 mL 0.5%罗哌卡因,地塞米松组接受20 mL 0.5%罗哌卡因加4mg地塞米松,右美托咪定组接受20 mL 0.5%罗哌卡因加75μg右美托咪定。测量感觉功能、运动功能恢复时间、首次疼痛感觉时间、术后24小时和48小时消耗的阿片类药物用量。
罗哌卡因组、右美托咪定组和地塞米松组吗啡当量的24小时中位(第25 - 75百分位数)阿片类药物消耗量分别为22.5mg(10 - 30)、15mg(0 - 30)和15mg(0 - 20.6),三组之间相似(P = 0.130)。术后48小时,罗哌卡因组吗啡当量的中位阿片类药物消耗量为40mg(25 - 67.5),地塞米松组为30mg(22 - 50.6),右美托咪定组为52.5mg(30 - 75)(P = 0.278)。罗哌卡因对照组24小时中位疼痛评分为6(5 - 8),地塞米松组为7(5.5 - 8),右美托咪定组为7(4 - 9)(P = 0.573)。
比较右美托咪定、地塞米松和不使用辅助药物时,术后24小时和48小时的阿片类药物消耗量无统计学差异。然而,与地塞米松和单纯0.5%罗哌卡因相比,右美托咪定术中阿片类药物用量显著更低。当可能禁忌使用地塞米松时,右美托咪定安全的副作用谱使其成为外周神经阻滞辅助药物的合理替代选择。