• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊朗的同行评审研究评估:优势、劣势与建议

Peer Review Research Evaluation in Iran: Strengths, Weaknesses and Suggestions.

作者信息

Eftekhari Monir Baradaran, Ebadifar Asghar, Ghalenoee Elham, Falahat Katayoun

机构信息

Department of Development and Coordination Research, Deputy for Research and Technology, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran.

Dentofacial Deformities Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Iran J Public Health. 2021 Jun;50(6):1260-1265. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i6.6427.

DOI:10.18502/ijph.v50i6.6427
PMID:34540747
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8410965/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peer based evaluation is a qualitative assessment done in different fields and levels. The aim of this study was to express the results of peer review evaluation in selected Iranian clinical research centers.

METHODS

Four main domains consist of Leadership and governance, Structure, Knowledge products and Impact in thirty Iranian clinical research centers were evaluated based on peer review in 2019. Strengths and weak points with peer's suggestions were extracted based on qualitative analysis.

RESULTS

Governance and impact domains have been more weak points than others. Equipment, facilities, physical space and human resource have been desirable in many research centers, and also there were some good developments in research publication. The most important suggestion was pay more attention to technology in planning, infra-structure and impact levels.

CONCLUSION

Review missions of clinical research centers with more emphasis on health impact is necessary to clinical improvement.

摘要

背景

同行评估是在不同领域和层面进行的定性评估。本研究的目的是公布在选定的伊朗临床研究中心进行同行评审评估的结果。

方法

2019年,基于同行评审对30个伊朗临床研究中心的四个主要领域进行了评估,这四个主要领域包括领导力与治理、结构、知识产品和影响力。通过定性分析提取了优势、弱点以及同行的建议。

结果

治理和影响力领域的弱点比其他领域更多。许多研究中心的设备、设施、物理空间和人力资源状况良好,并且在研究发表方面也有一些良好进展。最重要的建议是在规划、基础设施和影响力层面更多地关注技术。

结论

为了临床改进,有必要对临床研究中心进行更侧重于健康影响的评审任务。

相似文献

1
Peer Review Research Evaluation in Iran: Strengths, Weaknesses and Suggestions.伊朗的同行评审研究评估:优势、劣势与建议
Iran J Public Health. 2021 Jun;50(6):1260-1265. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i6.6427.
2
How to Assess Quality of Research in Iran, From Input to Impact? Introduction of Peer-Based Research Evaluation Model in Iran.如何评估伊朗的研究质量,从投入到影响?伊朗基于同行的研究评估模型介绍。
Arch Iran Med. 2017 Nov 1;20(11):680-685.
3
Development of Evaluation System for Iranian Health Research Networks: Challenges and Lessons Learned.伊朗卫生研究网络评估系统的发展:挑战与经验教训
Iran J Public Health. 2020 Jan;49(1):104-113.
4
Development of strategies to promote healthy sexuality based on Iranian girls perspective about the role of virginity in the construction of their sexuality: an explanatory sequential mixed method study protocol.基于伊朗女孩对贞操在构建她们的性观念中作用的看法,制定促进健康性行为的策略:一项解释性序贯混合方法研究方案。
Reprod Health. 2022 Feb 24;19(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01299-1.
5
Identifying challenges for academic leadership in medical universities in Iran.识别伊朗医科大学学术领导力面临的挑战。
Med Educ. 2010 May;44(5):459-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03570.x.
6
Determining Core Components in Accreditation of Limited Surgery Facilities in Iran.确定伊朗有限手术设施认证中的核心组成部分。
Galen Med J. 2020 Jun 25;9:e1729. doi: 10.31661/gmj.v9i0.1729. eCollection 2020.
7
Knowledge translation in Iranian universities: need for serious interventions.伊朗大学的知识转化:需要认真干预。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2013 Nov 13;11:43. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-11-43.
8
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
9
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
10
The challenges of implementation of clinical governance in Iran: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.伊朗实施临床治理面临的挑战:定性研究的元综合。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jan 9;17(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0399-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Designing an Impact-Oriented Model of Research and Technology Evaluation: An Experience of I.R.Iran.设计一个以影响为导向的研究与技术评估模型:伊朗伊斯兰共和国的经验。
Int J Prev Med. 2024 Oct 18;15:53. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_146_23. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
How to Assess Quality of Research in Iran, From Input to Impact? Introduction of Peer-Based Research Evaluation Model in Iran.如何评估伊朗的研究质量,从投入到影响?伊朗基于同行的研究评估模型介绍。
Arch Iran Med. 2017 Nov 1;20(11):680-685.
2
Medical Science and Research in Iran.伊朗的医学科学与研究。
Arch Iran Med. 2017 Nov 1;20(11):665-672.
3
Development of Health Research Structures Over the Last 25 Years: Main Achievements and Challenges.过去25年健康研究结构的发展:主要成就与挑战
Arch Iran Med. 2017 Nov 1;20(11):659-664.
4
Iranian science shows world's fastest growth: ranks 17th in science production in 2012.伊朗科学呈现出世界上最快的增长速度:在2012年的科研产出中排名第17位。
Avicenna J Med Biotechnol. 2013 Jul;5(3):139.
5
Trend of knowledge production of research centers in the field of medical sciences in iran.伊朗医学科学领域研究中心的知识产出趋势。
Iran J Public Health. 2013 Jan 1;42(Supple1):55-9. Print 2013.
6
Health research priority setting in Iran: Introduction to a bottom up approach.伊朗的卫生研究重点设定:自下而上方法介绍
J Res Med Sci. 2011 May;16(5):691-8.
7
Science production in Iran: The scenario of Iranian medical journals.伊朗的科研产出:伊朗医学期刊的情况
J Res Med Sci. 2009 Sep;14(5):313-22.