• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Research Note Describing a More Inclusive Approach to Identifying Same-Sex Cohabiters in the American Time Use Survey.描述一种更具包容性的方法来识别美国时间使用调查中的同性同居者的研究报告。
Demography. 2021 Dec 1;58(6):2029-2040. doi: 10.1215/00703370-9510524.
2
A Demographic, Attitudinal, and Behavioral Profile of Cohabiting Adults in the United States, 2011-2015.2011 - 2015年美国同居成年人的人口统计学、态度及行为概况
Natl Health Stat Report. 2018 May(111):1-11.
3
Measuring cohabitation and family structure in the United States: assessing the impact of new data from the Current Population Survey.测量美国的同居和家庭结构:评估来自当前人口调查的新数据的影响。
Demography. 2012 Nov;49(4):1479-98. doi: 10.1007/s13524-012-0126-8.
4
Same-Sex Couples' Shared Time in the United States.美国同性伴侣的共同时间
Demography. 2020 Apr;57(2):475-500. doi: 10.1007/s13524-020-00861-z.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Same-sex cohabiting elders versus different-sex cohabiting and married elders: effects of relationship status and sex of partner on economic and health outcomes.同性同居老年人与异性同居及已婚老年人:伴侣关系状况和性别对经济及健康状况的影响。
Soc Sci Res. 2014 Jan;43:60-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
7
Coital frequency among married and cohabiting couples in the United States.美国已婚和同居伴侣的性交频率。
J Biosoc Sci. 1995 Apr;27(2):135-50. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000022653.
8
Counting households containing same-sex couples: an inclusive approach.统计包含同性伴侣的家庭:一种包容性方法。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2022 Oct 11;7(1):1722. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v7i1.1722. eCollection 2022.
9
Investigating the American Time Use Survey from an exposure modeling perspective.从暴露建模的角度研究美国时间利用调查。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2011 Jan-Feb;21(1):92-105. doi: 10.1038/jes.2009.60. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
10
How social processes distort measurement: the impact of survey nonresponse on estimates of volunteer work in the United States.社会过程如何扭曲测量:美国调查无应答对志愿工作估计的影响。
AJS. 2009 Jan;114(4):1129-65. doi: 10.1086/595945.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying occupational health inequities in the absence of suitable data: are there inequities in access to adequate bathrooms in US workplaces?在缺乏合适数据的情况下识别职业健康不平等现象:美国工作场所的充足卫生间使用情况存在不平等吗?
Occup Environ Med. 2023 Oct;80(10):572-579. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2023-108900. Epub 2023 Sep 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Same-Sex Couples' Shared Time in the United States.美国同性伴侣的共同时间
Demography. 2020 Apr;57(2):475-500. doi: 10.1007/s13524-020-00861-z.
2
Disparities in sleep duration and restedness among same- and different-sex couples: findings from the American Time Use Survey.同性别和不同性别伴侣之间的睡眠时长和休息程度的差异:来自美国时间利用调查的发现。
Sleep. 2018 Aug 1;41(8). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsy090.
3
An Update on Identifying Same-Sex Couples in the American Time Use Survey.《美国时间使用调查中识别同性伴侣情况的最新进展》
Demography. 2016 Dec;53(6):2121-2122. doi: 10.1007/s13524-016-0523-5.
4
A Research Note on Time With Children in Different- and Same-Sex Two-Parent Families.关于不同性别和同性别双亲家庭中陪伴孩子时间的研究笔记。
Demography. 2015 Jun;52(3):905-18. doi: 10.1007/s13524-015-0385-2.
5
Measuring cohabitation and family structure in the United States: assessing the impact of new data from the Current Population Survey.测量美国的同居和家庭结构:评估来自当前人口调查的新数据的影响。
Demography. 2012 Nov;49(4):1479-98. doi: 10.1007/s13524-012-0126-8.

描述一种更具包容性的方法来识别美国时间使用调查中的同性同居者的研究报告。

A Research Note Describing a More Inclusive Approach to Identifying Same-Sex Cohabiters in the American Time Use Survey.

机构信息

IPUMS Center for Data Integration, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Institute for Behavioral Studies, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.

出版信息

Demography. 2021 Dec 1;58(6):2029-2040. doi: 10.1215/00703370-9510524.

DOI:10.1215/00703370-9510524
PMID:34541606
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8633037/
Abstract

Identification of individuals in same-sex relationships in the American Time Use Survey (ATUS) is of increasing interest to the research community. While the ATUS interviews one person per household, by using information about who else lives in the household, researchers can easily identify respondents in coresident same-sex couple arrangements. Previous research has outlined two approaches to identifying individuals in same-sex relationships in the ATUS that use information on the sex of household members. We extend that work in this research note by using additional information collected from a direct question to identify unmarried cohabiting partners in the Current Population Survey (CPS). We identify 23% more individuals in cohabiting same-sex relationships when we use the CPS direct question information than when we use information from the ATUS alone. We argue that this identification strategy is more inclusive of individuals in same-sex cohabiting relationships.

摘要

在美国家庭时间调查(ATUS)中识别同性伴侣关系中的个体越来越引起研究界的兴趣。虽然 ATUS 每次只采访一个家庭中的一个人,但通过使用有关谁与家庭同住的信息,研究人员可以轻松识别核心居住的同性伴侣关系中的受访者。以前的研究已经概述了两种方法,即使用有关家庭成员性别的信息来识别 ATUS 中的同性伴侣关系中的个体。在本研究说明中,我们通过使用从直接问题中收集的其他信息来扩展该工作,以识别当前人口调查(CPS)中的未婚同居伴侣。当我们使用 CPS 直接问题信息时,我们识别出的处于同居关系中的同性伴侣关系中的个体比仅使用 ATUS 信息时多了 23%。我们认为这种识别策略更能包容处于同性同居关系中的个体。