Shahabi Hossein, Taylor Kenneth, Hirfanoglu Tugba, Koneru Shreekanth, Bingaman William, Kobayashi Katsuya, Kobayashi Masako, Joshi Anand, Leahy Richard M, Mosher John C, Bulacio Juan, Nair Dileep
Signal and Image Processing Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Charles Shor Epilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Epilepsia. 2021 Nov;62(11):2753-2765. doi: 10.1111/epi.17064. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
To determine whether brain connectivity differs between focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) types I and II.
We compared cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) as measures of effective brain connectivity in 25 FCD patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who underwent intracranial evaluation with stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG). We analyzed the amplitude and latency of CCEP responses following ictal-onset single-pulse electrical stimulation (iSPES).
In comparison to FCD type II, patients with type I demonstrated significantly larger responses in the electrodes near the ictal-onset zone (<50 mm). These findings persisted when controlling for the location of the epileptogenic zone, as noted in patients with temporal lobe epilepsies, as well as controlling for seizure type, as noted in patients with focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS). In type II, the root mean square (RMS) of CCEP responses dropped substantially from the early segment (10-60 ms) to the middle and late segments (60-600 ms). The middle and late CCEP latency segments showed the largest differences between FCD types I and II.
Focal cortical dysplasia type I may have a greater degree of cortical hyperexcitability as compared with FCD type II. In addition, FCD type II displays a more restrictive area of hyperexcitability in both temporal and spatial domains. In patients with FBTCS and type I FCD, the increased amplitudes of RMS in the middle and late CCEP periods appear consistent with the cortico-thalamo-cortical network involvement of FBTCS. The notable differences in degree and extent of hyperexcitability may contribute to the different postsurgical seizure outcomes noted between these two pathological substrates.
确定I型和II型局灶性皮质发育不良(FCD)之间的脑连接性是否存在差异。
我们比较了25例耐药性局灶性癫痫的FCD患者的皮质-皮质诱发电位(CCEP),这些患者接受了立体脑电图(SEEG)颅内评估,以此作为有效脑连接性的测量指标。我们分析了发作起始单脉冲电刺激(iSPES)后CCEP反应的振幅和潜伏期。
与II型FCD相比,I型患者在发作起始区附近(<50毫米)的电极上表现出明显更大的反应。正如颞叶癫痫患者中所观察到的,在控制致痫区位置时,以及正如局灶性双侧强直-阵挛性发作(FBTCS)患者中所观察到的,在控制发作类型时,这些发现依然存在。在II型中,CCEP反应的均方根(RMS)从早期段(10 - 60毫秒)到中晚期段(60 - 600毫秒)大幅下降。CCEP潜伏期的中晚期段在I型和II型FCD之间显示出最大差异。
与II型FCD相比,I型局灶性皮质发育不良可能具有更高程度的皮质兴奋性过高。此外,II型FCD在时间和空间域中均表现出更局限的兴奋性过高区域。在FBTCS和I型FCD患者中,CCEP中晚期的RMS振幅增加似乎与FBTCS的皮质-丘脑-皮质网络受累一致。兴奋性过高程度和范围的显著差异可能导致这两种病理基质术后癫痫发作结果的不同。