Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Auburn University MRI Research Center, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA.
Brain Connect. 2022 Sep;12(7):629-638. doi: 10.1089/brain.2021.0062. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
Stress-related disruption of emotion regulation appears to involve the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and amygdala. However, the interactions between brain regions that mediate stress-induced changes in emotion regulation remain unclear. The present study builds upon prior work that assessed stress-induced changes in the neurobehavioral response to threat by investigating effective connectivity between these brain regions. Participants completed the Montreal Imaging Stress Task followed by a Pavlovian fear conditioning procedure during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Stress ratings and psychophysiological responses were used to assess stress reactivity. Effective connectivity during fear conditioning was identified using multivariate autoregressive modeling. Effective connectivity values were calculated during threat presentations that were either predictable (preceded by a warning cue) or unpredictable (no warning cue). A neural hub within the dorsomedial PFC (dmPFC) showed greater effective connectivity to other PFC regions, inferior parietal lobule, insula, and amygdala during predictable than unpredictable threat. The dmPFC also showed greater connectivity to different dorsolateral PFC and amygdala regions during unpredictable than predictable threat. Stress ratings varied with connectivity differences from the dmPFC to the amygdala. Connectivity from dmPFC to amygdala was greater in general during unpredictable than predictable threat, however, this connectivity increased during predictable compared with unpredictable threat as stress reactivity increased. Our findings suggest that acute stress disrupts connectivity underlying top-down emotion regulation of the threat response. Furthermore, increased connectivity between the dmPFC and amygdala may play a critical role in stress-induced changes in the emotional response to threat. Impact statement The present study builds upon prior work that assessed stress-induced changes in the human neurobehavioral response to threat by demonstrating that increased top-down connectivity from the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex to the amygdala varies with individual differences in stress reactivity. These findings provide novel evidence in humans of stress-induced disruption of a specific top-down corticolimbic circuit during active emotion regulation processes, which may play a causal role in the long-term effects of chronic or excessive stress exposure.
压力相关的情绪调节障碍似乎涉及前额叶皮层(PFC)和杏仁核。然而,介导应激诱导的情绪调节变化的大脑区域之间的相互作用仍不清楚。本研究在前人研究的基础上,通过研究这些大脑区域之间的有效连通性,评估了应激对威胁的神经行为反应的变化。参与者在功能磁共振成像(fMRI)期间完成了蒙特利尔成像应激任务,然后进行了条件性恐惧训练程序。应激评分和生理反应用于评估应激反应性。使用多元自回归模型确定条件性恐惧训练期间的有效连通性。在可预测(有警告提示)或不可预测(无警告提示)的威胁呈现期间计算有效连通性值。与不可预测的威胁相比,在可预测的威胁中,背内侧前额叶皮层(dmPFC)内的一个神经中枢与其他前额叶皮层区域、下顶叶皮层、岛叶和杏仁核之间的有效连通性更强。dmPFC 与不同的背外侧前额叶皮层和杏仁核区域之间的连接性在不可预测的威胁中比可预测的威胁更强。应激评分与 dmPFC 与杏仁核之间的连接差异有关。一般来说,不可预测的威胁比可预测的威胁时 dmPFC 到杏仁核的连接性更强,然而,随着应激反应性的增加,可预测的威胁时的连接性比不可预测的威胁时增加。我们的发现表明,急性应激会破坏威胁反应的自上而下情绪调节的基础连通性。此外,dmPFC 和杏仁核之间的连接增加可能在应激诱导的威胁反应的情绪变化中发挥关键作用。 研究意义 本研究在前人研究的基础上,通过证明背内侧前额叶皮层到杏仁核的自上而下连接性增加与个体应激反应性的差异有关,进一步评估了应激对人类对威胁的神经行为反应的变化。这些发现为人类提供了新的证据,表明在主动情绪调节过程中,应激会破坏特定的自上而下的皮质边缘回路,这可能在慢性或过度应激暴露的长期影响中起因果作用。