Wheelock M D, Sreenivasan K R, Wood K H, Ver Hoef L W, Deshpande Gopikrishna, Knight D C
Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
AU MRI Research Center, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Neuroimage. 2014 Nov 15;102 Pt 2(0 2):904-12. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
Conditioned changes in the emotional response to threat (e.g. aversive unconditioned stimulus; UCS) are mediated in part by the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Unpredictable threats elicit large emotional responses, while the response is diminished when the threat is predictable. A better understanding of how PFC connectivity to other brain regions varies with threat predictability would provide important insights into the neural processes that mediate conditioned diminution of the emotional response to threat. The present study examined brain connectivity during predictable and unpredictable threat exposure using a fear conditioning paradigm (previously published in Wood et al., 2012) in which unconditioned functional magnetic resonance imaging data were reanalyzed to assess effective connectivity. Granger causality analysis was performed using the time series data from 15 activated regions of interest after hemodynamic deconvolution, to determine regional effective connectivity. In addition, connectivity path weights were correlated with trait anxiety measures to assess the relationship between negative affect and brain connectivity. Results indicate the dorsomedial PFC (dmPFC) serves as a neural hub that influences activity in other brain regions when threats are unpredictable. In contrast, the dorsolateral PFC (dlPFC) serves as a neural hub that influences the activity of other brain regions when threats are predictable. These findings are consistent with the view that the dmPFC coordinates brain activity to take action, perhaps in a reactive manner, when an unpredicted threat is encountered, while the dlPFC coordinates brain regions to take action, in what may be a more proactive manner, to respond to predictable threats. Further, dlPFC connectivity to other brain regions (e.g. ventromedial PFC, amygdala, and insula) varied with negative affect (i.e. trait anxiety) when the UCS was predictable, suggesting that stronger connectivity may be required for emotion regulation in individuals with higher levels of negative affect.
对威胁(如厌恶性无条件刺激;UCS)的情绪反应中的条件性变化部分由前额叶皮层(PFC)介导。不可预测的威胁会引发强烈的情绪反应,而当威胁可预测时,反应则会减弱。更好地理解PFC与其他脑区的连接如何随威胁可预测性而变化,将为介导对威胁的情绪反应条件性减弱的神经过程提供重要见解。本研究使用恐惧条件反射范式(先前发表于Wood等人,2012年),在可预测和不可预测的威胁暴露期间检查脑连接性,其中对无条件功能磁共振成像数据进行重新分析以评估有效连接性。使用血流动力学去卷积后来自15个激活兴趣区域的时间序列数据进行格兰杰因果分析,以确定区域有效连接性。此外,连接路径权重与特质焦虑测量值相关,以评估负面影响与脑连接性之间的关系。结果表明,当威胁不可预测时,背内侧前额叶皮层(dmPFC)作为一个神经枢纽,影响其他脑区的活动。相比之下,当威胁可预测时,背外侧前额叶皮层(dlPFC)作为一个神经枢纽,影响其他脑区的活动。这些发现与以下观点一致,即当遇到不可预测的威胁时,dmPFC协调脑活动以采取行动,可能是以一种反应性的方式,而dlPFC协调脑区以一种可能更主动的方式采取行动以应对可预测的威胁。此外,当无条件刺激可预测时,dlPFC与其他脑区(如腹内侧前额叶皮层、杏仁核和脑岛)的连接随负面影响(即特质焦虑)而变化,这表明对于负面影响水平较高的个体,情绪调节可能需要更强的连接性。