Suppr超能文献

脑反应性神经刺激(RNS® 系统)治疗在老年人中的疗效、安全性和结局。

The Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes of Brain-responsive Neurostimulation (RNS® System) therapy in older adults.

机构信息

Epilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Department of Neurology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsia Open. 2021 Dec;6(4):781-787. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12541. Epub 2021 Oct 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The gold standard for the management of drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DRE) is resection of epileptogenic zone. However, some patients may not be candidates for resection. Responsive neurostimulation is approved in patients above 18 years of age for such patients. We aimed to investigate whether RNS outcomes and safety varied based on age.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with DRE who were treated with RNS between May 2008 and February 2020. We included patients who had been implanted with RNS for >6 months (N = 55), dividing them into older (N = 11) and younger adults (N = 44) depending on implantation age (≥50 and <50 years, respectively).

RESULTS

Mean age at implantation in older adults was 54.9 ± 3.5 years. Seizure onset age, epilepsy duration, and comorbidities were significantly higher in older adults ( P < .01). Stimulation parameters, treatment duration, and median seizure frequency reduction (76% in older vs 50% in younger adults) were statistically comparable between the two cohorts. Posttreatment, antiseizure medication burden was significantly decreased in older compared with younger adults (P = .048). Postoperative and delayed adverse events among older adults were mild. Compared with three younger adults, none of the older adults required device explantation due to surgical site infection.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that older adults treated with the RNS System achieve seizure outcomes comparable to younger adults with the additional benefit of a significant postimplantation medication reduction. With efficacy and safety similar to younger adults, brain-responsive neurostimulation was well-tolerated in older adults.

摘要

目的

耐药性局灶性癫痫(DRE)的治疗金标准是切除致痫区。然而,有些患者可能不适合进行切除手术。对于这些患者,可使用响应性神经刺激进行治疗。我们旨在研究基于年龄的 RNS 治疗结果和安全性是否存在差异。

方法

我们进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2008 年 5 月至 2020 年 2 月期间接受 RNS 治疗的 DRE 患者。我们纳入了 RNS 植入>6 个月的患者(N=55),根据植入年龄(≥50 岁和<50 岁)将他们分为老年组(N=11)和年轻成年组(N=44)。

结果

老年组患者的平均植入年龄为 54.9±3.5 岁。与年轻成年组相比,老年组患者的癫痫发作年龄、癫痫持续时间和合并症显著更高(P<0.01)。两组的刺激参数、治疗持续时间和中位癫痫发作频率降低(老年组为 76%,年轻成年组为 50%)具有统计学可比性。治疗后,老年组的抗癫痫药物负担明显低于年轻成年组(P=0.048)。老年组术后和迟发性不良事件均为轻度。与 3 名年轻成年患者相比,无 1 名老年患者因手术部位感染而需要取出设备。

结论

我们的研究表明,接受 RNS 系统治疗的老年患者与年轻成年患者的癫痫发作结果相当,且具有明显的术后药物减少的额外获益。与年轻成年患者相似的疗效和安全性,脑响应性神经刺激在老年患者中耐受性良好。

相似文献

6
Responsive neurostimulation for regional neocortical epilepsy.区域皮质癫痫的反应性神经刺激。
Epilepsia. 2020 Jan;61(1):96-106. doi: 10.1111/epi.16409. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
10
Deep brain and cortical stimulation for epilepsy.用于癫痫治疗的深部脑刺激和皮层刺激
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 17(6):CD008497. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008497.pub2.

引用本文的文献

2

本文引用的文献

3
Responsive neurostimulation for regional neocortical epilepsy.区域皮质癫痫的反应性神经刺激。
Epilepsia. 2020 Jan;61(1):96-106. doi: 10.1111/epi.16409. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
5
Application of RNS in refractory epilepsy: Targeting insula.RNS在难治性癫痫中的应用:以脑岛为靶点。
Epilepsia Open. 2017 Jul 4;2(3):345-349. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12061. eCollection 2017 Sep.
7
Breaking the age barrier: Epilepsy surgery in septuagenarians.突破年龄障碍:老年癫痫患者的手术治疗
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 May;70(Pt A):94-96. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.03.017. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
9
Chronic ambulatory electrocorticography from human speech cortex.来自人类言语皮层的慢性动态皮层脑电图
Neuroimage. 2017 Jun;153:273-282. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 Apr 7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验