Johnson Claire D, Green Bart N
J Chiropr Educ. 2021 Sep 1;35(S1):74-84. doi: 10.7899/JCE-21-26.
This is the fifth article in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical specialty societies violated antitrust law by restraining chiropractors' business practices. The purpose of this article is to provide a brief review of events surrounding the eventual end of the AMA's Committee on Quackery and the exposure of evidence of the AMA's efforts to boycott the chiropractic profession.
This historical research study used a phenomenological approach to qualitative inquiry into the conflict between regular medicine and chiropractic and the events before, during, and after a legal dispute at the time of modernization of the chiropractic profession. Our methods included obtaining primary and secondary data sources. The final narrative recount was developed into 8 articles following a successive timeline. This article, the fifth of the series, explores the exposure of what the AMA had been doing, which provided evidence that was eventually used in the Wilk v AMA antitrust lawsuit.
The prime mission of the AMA's Committee on Quackery was "first, the containment of chiropractic and, ultimately, the elimination of chiropractic." However, the committee did not complete its mission and quietly disbanded in 1974. This was the same year that the chiropractic profession finally gained licensure in all 50 of the United States; received recognition from the US Commissioner of Education, Department of Health, Education and Welfare; and was successfully included in Medicare. In 1975, documents reportedly obtained by the Church of Scientology covert operatives under Operation AMA Doom revealed the extent to which the AMA and its Committee on Quackery had been working to contain and eliminate the chiropractic profession. The AMA actions included influencing mainstream media, decisions made by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals, and the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Other actions included publishing propaganda against chiropractic and implementing an anti-chiropractic program aimed at medical students, medical societies, and the American public.
After more than a decade of overt and covert actions, the AMA chose to end its Committee on Quackery. The following year, documents exposed the extent of AMA's efforts to enact its boycott of chiropractic.
本文是系列文章中的第五篇,该系列探讨了围绕威尔克诉美国医学协会(AMA)诉讼案的历史事件,在该诉讼案中,原告认为AMA、美国医院协会及其他医学专业协会通过限制脊椎按摩疗法从业者的商业行为违反了反垄断法。本文旨在简要回顾AMA江湖骗术委员会最终解散的相关事件,以及AMA抵制脊椎按摩疗法行业的证据曝光情况。
这项历史研究采用现象学方法对常规医学与脊椎按摩疗法之间的冲突以及脊椎按摩疗法行业现代化时期法律纠纷之前、期间和之后的事件进行定性探究。我们的方法包括获取一手和二手资料来源。最终的叙述性记录按照连续的时间线编写成8篇文章。本文作为该系列的第五篇,探讨了AMA所作所为的曝光情况,这些情况提供了最终在威尔克诉AMA反垄断诉讼案中被采用的证据。
AMA江湖骗术委员会的主要使命是“首先,遏制脊椎按摩疗法,最终消除脊椎按摩疗法”。然而,该委员会并未完成其使命,并于1974年悄然解散。同年,脊椎按摩疗法行业最终在美国所有50个州都获得了执业许可;得到了美国卫生、教育与福利部教育专员的认可;并成功被纳入医疗保险体系。1975年,据报道,科学教特工在“AMA末日行动”中获取的文件揭示了AMA及其江湖骗术委员会为遏制和消除脊椎按摩疗法行业所做努力的程度。AMA的行动包括影响主流媒体、医院评审联合委员会的决策以及卫生、教育与福利部的决策。其他行动包括发布反对脊椎按摩疗法的宣传资料,以及针对医学生、医学协会和美国公众实施一项反脊椎按摩疗法计划。
经过十多年的公开和秘密行动,AMA选择终止其江湖骗术委员会。次年,文件曝光了AMA实施抵制脊椎按摩疗法行动的程度。