Johnson Claire D, Green Bart N
J Chiropr Educ. 2021 Sep 1;35(S1):117-131. doi: 10.7899/JCE-21-29.
This paper is the eighth in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical specialty societies violated antitrust law by restraining chiropractors' business practices. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the possible impact that the final decision in favor of the plaintiffs may have had on the chiropractic profession.
This historical research study used a phenomenological approach to qualitative inquiry into the conflict between regular medicine and chiropractic and the events before, during, and after a legal dispute at the time of modernization of the chiropractic profession. Our methods included obtaining primary and secondary data sources. The final narrative recount was developed into 8 papers following a successive timeline. This paper is the eighth of the series that discusses how the trial decision may have influenced the chiropractic that we know today in the United States.
Chiropractic practice, education, and research have changed since before the lawsuit was filed. There are several areas in which we propose that the trial decision may have had an impact on the chiropractic profession.
The lawsuit removed the barriers that were implemented by organized medicine against the chiropractic profession. The quality of chiropractic practice, education, and research continues to improve and the profession continues to meet its most fundamental mission: to improve the lives of patients. Chiropractors practicing in the United States today are allowed to collaborate freely with other health professionals. Today, patients have the option to access chiropractic care because of the dedicated efforts of many people to reduce the previous barriers. It is up to the present-day members of the medical and chiropractic professions to look back and to remember what happened. By recalling the events surrounding the lawsuit, we may have a better understanding about our professions today. This information may help to facilitate interactions between medicine and chiropractic and to develop more respectful partnerships focused on creating a better future for the health of the public. The future of the chiropractic profession rests in the heads, hearts, and hands of its current members to do what is right.
本文是系列文章中的第八篇,该系列探讨了围绕威尔克诉美国医学协会(AMA)诉讼案的历史事件,在该诉讼中,原告认为AMA、美国医院协会及其他医学专业协会通过限制脊椎按摩疗法从业者的商业行为违反了反垄断法。本文旨在讨论有利于原告的最终判决可能对脊椎按摩疗法行业产生的影响。
这项历史研究采用现象学方法对常规医学与脊椎按摩疗法之间的冲突以及脊椎按摩疗法行业现代化时期法律纠纷之前、期间和之后的事件进行定性探究。我们的方法包括获取一手和二手数据源。最终的叙述性记录按照连续的时间线编写成8篇论文。本文是该系列的第八篇,讨论了审判结果可能如何影响了我们今天在美国所熟知的脊椎按摩疗法。
自诉讼提起之前,脊椎按摩疗法的实践、教育和研究就已经发生了变化。我们提出审判结果可能在几个方面对脊椎按摩疗法行业产生了影响。
该诉讼消除了组织化医学针对脊椎按摩疗法行业设置的障碍。脊椎按摩疗法的实践、教育和研究质量持续提高,该行业继续履行其最基本的使命:改善患者生活。如今在美国执业的脊椎按摩疗法从业者可以自由地与其他健康专业人员合作。如今,由于许多人致力于消除先前的障碍,患者可以选择接受脊椎按摩疗法治疗。医学和脊椎按摩疗法行业的当今成员有责任回顾并铭记所发生的事情。通过回顾围绕该诉讼的事件,我们可能会对我们今天的行业有更好的理解。这些信息可能有助于促进医学与脊椎按摩疗法之间的互动,并建立更受尊重的伙伴关系,致力于为公众健康创造更美好的未来。脊椎按摩疗法行业的未来掌握在其现任成员的头脑、心灵和手中,他们要做正确的事。