Álvarez Alvarado Dellys Adriana, Quintero Picón Melissa Alejandra, Taborda-Murillo Alejandra, Ortiz-Arango Natalia, Ospina Ospina Sigifredo, Arias Luis Fernando
Departamento de Patología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Centro de Microscopía Avanzada, Sede de Investigación Universitaria (SIU), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Rev Esp Patol. 2021 Oct-Dec;54(4):234-241. doi: 10.1016/j.patol.2021.01.003. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
Electron microscopy (EM) has been used in the study of renal biopsies for more than 5 decades; however, it is expensive and the possibility of restricting it to selected cases has been considered. This study aims to reevaluate the necessity for EM in the diagnosis of renal biopsies today.
All renal biopsies taken between 2016 and 2019 with adequate light microscopy (LM), immunofluorescence (IF) and EM studies were included. The initial diagnosis (without EM) and the final diagnosis (with EM) was recorded. EM was considered necessary in cases in which the initial and final diagnoses did not concur, when diagnosis could not be made with LM and IF only or if the EM study revealed further clinically relevant findings.
A total of 621 biopsies were included, 498 (80.2%) of native kidneys and 123 (19.8%) of transplanted kidneys. In 115 cases (18.5%) EM had been deemed necessary for diagnosis; it was required more frequently in hereditary diseases (96.8%) and isolated hematuria (88.9%) but less often in nephrotic syndrome (6.7%) and renal transplant biopsy (5.7%) (p < 0.001).
EM was required in less than a fifth of renal biopsies, being more necessary in isolated hematuria and hereditary diseases and less so in nephrotic syndrome and in renal graft biopsies. These findings may prove useful as a guide to case selection protocols in which EM could be considered as a non-mandatory technique.
