Suppr超能文献

泡沫轴滚压与动态拉伸对足球运动员柔韧性、平衡能力和敏捷性即时影响的比较:与仅动态拉伸的比较。

Comparison of Immediate Effects of Foam Rolling and Dynamic Stretching to Only Dynamic Stretching on Flexibility, Balance, and Agility in Male Soccer Players.

出版信息

J Sport Rehabil. 2022 Jan 1;31(1):10-16. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2021-0017. Epub 2021 Sep 20.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Dynamic stretching (DS) is typically suggested during warm-up protocols. Also, foam rolling (FR), which is applied with a foam cylinder, has increased popularity in recent years. However, the combined effects of DS and FR in improving flexibility, dynamic balance, and agility performance are unclear in current literature. Therefore, this study aim to evaluate and compare the acute effects of DS as well as DS followed by FR (DS + FR) on flexibility, dynamic balance, and agility in male soccer players.

DESIGN

This study was a crossover study with a within-subject design.

METHODS

Thirty volunteer male soccer players (mean age 18.80 [0.66] y) were included in the study. Each participant performed the 2 sessions (DS and DS + FR) on separate occasions in a randomized order, with an interval of 72 hours. All sessions were performed in the indoor gym at the sports club. Flexibility was assessed by sit-and-reach test, dynamic balance was assessed by Y balance test, and agility was assessed by t test.

RESULTS

Compared with the pretest results, significant improvement in flexibility was observed in both groups (change = 0.55, percentage change = 2.05, effect size [ES] = 0.15, P = .041; change = 0.64, percentage change = 2.36, ES = 0.20, P = .025; respectively). Balance scores did not significantly improve in either group (change = 0.40, percentage change = 0.45, ES = 0.09, P = .342; change = 0.93, percentage change = 1.02, ES = 0.23, P = .103; respectively). Agility performance significantly improved in both groups (change = -0.12, percentage change = -1.18, ES = 0.19, P = .021; change = -0.21, percentage change = -2.18, ES = 0.38, P = .005; respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Both DS and DS + FR improved flexibility and agility and did not affect balance. DS + FR was not superior to DS at improving flexibility and agility as compared only with DS. Both methods are effective warm-up protocols to augment factors related to injury risk and performance. It seems that further studies that investigate the combined effects of FR and DS are needed.

摘要

背景

动态拉伸(DS)通常在热身方案中建议使用。此外,近年来,使用泡沫轴进行的泡沫滚动(FR)越来越受欢迎。然而,目前的文献中尚不清楚 DS 和 FR 联合使用对柔韧性、动态平衡和敏捷性表现的综合影响。因此,本研究旨在评估和比较 DS 以及 DS 后紧接着 FR(DS+FR)对男性足球运动员柔韧性、动态平衡和敏捷性的急性影响。

设计

这是一项交叉研究,采用自身对照设计。

方法

30 名志愿男性足球运动员(平均年龄 18.80[0.66]岁)被纳入研究。每位参与者在相隔 72 小时的情况下,以随机顺序分别进行 2 次试验(DS 和 DS+FR)。所有试验均在体育俱乐部的室内健身房进行。柔韧性通过坐立前伸测试进行评估,动态平衡通过 Y 平衡测试进行评估,敏捷性通过 t 测试进行评估。

结果

与预测试结果相比,两组的柔韧性均显著改善(变化=0.55,百分比变化=2.05,效应量[ES]=0.15,P=0.041;变化=0.64,百分比变化=2.36,ES=0.20,P=0.025;分别)。两组的平衡评分均无显著改善(变化=0.40,百分比变化=0.45,ES=0.09,P=0.342;变化=0.93,百分比变化=1.02,ES=0.23,P=0.103;分别)。两组的敏捷性表现均显著改善(变化=-0.12,百分比变化=-1.18,ES=0.19,P=0.021;变化=-0.21,百分比变化=-2.18,ES=0.38,P=0.005;分别)。

结论

DS 和 DS+FR 均可提高柔韧性和敏捷性,且不会影响平衡。与仅进行 DS 相比,DS+FR 对柔韧性和敏捷性的改善并不优于 DS。两种方法均为有效热身方案,可增强与受伤风险和表现相关的因素。似乎需要进一步研究 FR 和 DS 的联合作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验