Sports Centre, University of Malaya, Malaysia.
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Oct;24(10):2698-704. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bf049c.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of static, dynamic, and the combination of static and dynamic stretching within a pre-exercise warm-up on the Illinois agility test (IAT) in soccer players. Nineteen professional soccer players (age = 22.5 ± 2.5 years, height = 1.79 ± 0.003 m, body mass = 74.8 ± 10.9 kg) were tested for agility performance using the IAT after different warm-up protocols consisting of static, dynamic, combined stretching, and no stretching. The players were subgrouped into less and more experienced players (5.12 ± 0.83 and 8.18 ± 1.16 years, respectively). There were significant decreases in agility time after no stretching, among no stretching vs. static stretching; after dynamic stretching, among static vs. dynamic stretching; and after dynamic stretching, among dynamic vs. combined stretching during warm-ups for the agility: mean ± SD data were 14.18 ± 0.66 seconds (no stretch), 14.90 ± 0.38 seconds (static), 13.95 ± 0.32 seconds (dynamic), and 14.50 ± 0.35 seconds (combined). There was significant difference between less and more experienced players after no stretching and dynamic stretching. There was significant decrease in agility time following dynamic stretching vs. static stretching in both less and more experienced players. Static stretching does not appear to be detrimental to agility performance when combined with dynamic warm-up for professional soccer players. However, dynamic stretching during the warm-up was most effective as preparation for agility performance. The data from this study suggest that more experienced players demonstrate better agility skills due to years of training and playing soccer.
本研究旨在探讨运动前热身中静态拉伸、动态拉伸和静态拉伸与动态拉伸相结合对足球运动员伊利诺伊州敏捷测试（IAT）的影响。19 名职业足球运动员（年龄=22.5±2.5 岁，身高=1.79±0.003m，体重=74.8±10.9kg）在经过不同的热身方案（包括静态拉伸、动态拉伸、结合拉伸和不拉伸）后，使用 IAT 进行了敏捷性测试。运动员根据经验分为经验较少组（5.12±0.83 年）和经验较多组（8.18±1.16 年）。在热身过程中，不拉伸、不拉伸与静态拉伸相比、动态拉伸与静态拉伸相比、动态拉伸与结合拉伸相比，敏捷性时间均显著减少：平均±SD 数据分别为 14.18±0.66 秒（不拉伸）、14.90±0.38 秒（静态）、13.95±0.32 秒（动态）和 14.50±0.35 秒（结合）。在不拉伸和动态拉伸后，经验较少和经验较多的运动员之间存在显著差异。在经验较少和经验较多的运动员中，与静态拉伸相比，动态拉伸后敏捷性时间显著减少。在为职业足球运动员进行动态热身时，静态拉伸与动态拉伸相结合似乎不会对敏捷性表现产生不利影响。然而，动态拉伸作为热身准备对敏捷性表现最有效。本研究的数据表明，由于多年的训练和踢足球，经验丰富的运动员表现出更好的敏捷技能。
