Rodney W M, Quigley C B, Werblun M N, Sumbureru D, Shear C L
Department of Family Medicine, San Bernardino County Medical Center, CA 92415-0935.
Fam Pract Res J. 1986 Spring;5(3):167-76.
Patient satisfaction with resident physicians and patient satisfaction with faculty physicians was investigated in three clinical centers of a county hospital-based family medicine residency. Only patients in a continuity relationship (minimum 5 visits) were studied. Utilizing a previously validated Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ), the dimensions of access, availability, continuity, finances, physician humaneness, and physician quality/competence were measured. Although there was little discriminant power between the measures of physician humaneness and quality/competence of care, overall internal validity was high. Availability and finances created the most dissatisfaction. Residents' care was reported to be as satisfying as that delivered by faculty physicians. Differentiation between system dependent factors and physician-dependent factors may be difficult among patients with a demonstrated continuity relationship. Nevertheless this study demonstrated a high internal validity for the short form of the PSQ in yet another practice setting. This instrument is available for further investigation in clinical settings.
在一家县级医院附属家庭医学住院医师培训项目的三个临床中心,对患者对住院医师的满意度以及患者对指导医师的满意度进行了调查。仅对建立了连续性关系(至少就诊5次)的患者进行研究。使用先前经过验证的患者满意度调查问卷(PSQ),对就诊机会、可及性、连续性、费用、医师人文关怀以及医师质量/能力等维度进行了测量。尽管医师人文关怀措施与护理质量/能力措施之间几乎没有判别力,但总体内部效度较高。可及性和费用引发的不满最多。据报告,住院医师提供的护理与指导医师提供的护理一样令人满意。在已建立连续性关系的患者中,区分系统相关因素和医师相关因素可能较为困难。然而,本研究在另一种实践环境中证明了PSQ简表具有较高的内部效度。该工具可供在临床环境中进一步研究使用。