Departments of Pathology.
Population and Data Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical School.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2022 Mar 1;46(3):404-414. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001810.
The diagnosis of endometrial atypical hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia (AH/EIN) remains challenging and subjective in some cases, with variable histologic criteria and differences of opinion among gynecologic pathologists, potentially leading to under/overtreatment. There has been growing interest in the use of specific immunohistochemical markers as adjuncts in AH/EIN diagnosis. For example, the World Health Organization 2020 Classification specifies that loss of Pten, Pax2, or mismatch repair proteins are desirable diagnostic criteria. Other markers, most notably β-catenin and Arid1a, are also aberrantly expressed in some AH/EIN. However, the performance of some markers individually-and more importantly as a group-has not been rigorously explored, raising questions as to which marker(s) or combination(s) is the most effective in practice. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections from AH/EIN cases (n=111) were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for 6 markers: Pax2, Pten, Mlh1, β-catenin, Arid1a, and p53. Aberrant expression was tabulated for each case and marker. An additional set of normal endometria (n=79) was also analyzed to define optimal diagnostic criteria for marker aberrance. The performance characteristics of each marker, the entire panel, and subsets thereof were quantitatively and statistically analyzed. In order of number of cases detected, the most frequently aberrant markers in AH/EIN were Pax2 (81.1% of cases), Pten (50.5%), β-catenin (47.7%), Arid1a (7.2%), Mlh1 (4.5%), and p53 (2.7%). The majority of cases showed aberrant expression of ≥2 markers. All 6 markers together identified 92.8% of cases. Arid1a, Mlh1, and p53 were robust and readily scored markers, but all cases showing aberrant expression of these 3 markers were also detected by Pax2, Pten, or β-catenin. A focused panel of only 3 markers (Pax2, Pten, and β-catenin) showed optimal performance characteristics as a diagnostic adjunct in the histopathologic diagnosis of AH/EIN. Use of this panel is practicable and robust, with at least 1 of the 3 markers being aberrant in 92.8% of AH/EIN.
子宫内膜非典型增生/子宫内膜上皮内瘤变(AH/EIN)的诊断在某些情况下仍然具有挑战性和主观性,存在可变的组织学标准和妇科病理学家之间的意见分歧,可能导致治疗不足或过度治疗。人们越来越感兴趣的是使用特定的免疫组织化学标志物作为 AH/EIN 诊断的辅助手段。例如,世界卫生组织 2020 年分类规定,Pten、Pax2 或错配修复蛋白的缺失是理想的诊断标准。其他标志物,尤其是β-连环蛋白和 Arid1a,在一些 AH/EIN 中也异常表达。然而,一些标志物单独使用的性能——更重要的是作为一个组合的性能——尚未得到严格探索,这就提出了一个问题,即哪种标志物或组合在实践中最有效。对 111 例 AH/EIN 病例的福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织切片进行了 6 种标志物的免疫组织化学分析:Pax2、Pten、Mlh1、β-连环蛋白、Arid1a 和 p53。对每个病例和标志物的异常表达进行了制表。还分析了另一组正常子宫内膜(n=79),以确定标志物异常的最佳诊断标准。对每个标志物、整个面板及其子集的性能特征进行了定量和统计学分析。按照检测到的病例数量顺序,AH/EIN 中最常见的异常标志物是 Pax2(81.1%的病例)、Pten(50.5%)、β-连环蛋白(47.7%)、Arid1a(7.2%)、Mlh1(4.5%)和 p53(2.7%)。大多数病例显示至少有 2 种标志物异常表达。所有 6 种标志物联合检测可识别 92.8%的病例。Arid1a、Mlh1 和 p53 是稳健且易于评分的标志物,但所有显示这 3 种标志物异常表达的病例也被 Pax2、Pten 或β-连环蛋白检测到。只有 3 种标志物(Pax2、Pten 和β-连环蛋白)的重点面板作为 AH/EIN 组织病理学诊断的辅助诊断具有最佳的性能特征。该面板的使用是可行且稳健的,至少有 1 种标志物在 92.8%的 AH/EIN 中异常。