• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大学生对 STEM 领域循证教学实践的认同框架:信任和成长型思维的作用。

A Framework of College Student Buy-in to Evidence-Based Teaching Practices in STEM: The Roles of Trust and Growth Mindset.

机构信息

STEM Program Evaluation & Research Lab (STEM-PERL), Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06420.

Educational Alliance, New York, NY 10002.

出版信息

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Dec;20(4):ar54. doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-08-0185.

DOI:10.1187/cbe.20-08-0185
PMID:34546099
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8715782/
Abstract

Evidence-based teaching practices (EBPs) foster college science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) students' engagement and performance, yet our knowledge of what contributes to the effectiveness of these practices is less established. We propose a framework that links four social-cognitive variables-students' trust in their instructors, growth mindset, buy-in to instructional practices, and course engagement-to long-standing desired student outcomes of academic performance and intent to persist in science. This framework was tested in classrooms identified as having a high level of EBP implementation with a multi-institutional sample of 2102 undergraduates taught by 14 faculty members. Results indicate that the buy-in framework is a valid representation of college students' learning experiences within EBP contexts overall as well as across underrepresented student groups. In comparison to students' level of growth mindset, students' trust in their instructors was more than twice as predictive of buy-in to how the course was being taught, suggesting that students' views of their instructors are more associated with thriving in a high-EBP course environment than their views of intelligence. This study contributes to the dialogue on transforming undergraduate STEM education by providing a validated student buy-in framework as a lens to understand how EBPs enhance student outcomes.

摘要

循证教学实践(EBPs)促进了大学生在科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域的参与和表现,但我们对于这些实践有效性的认知还不够完善。我们提出了一个框架,将学生对教师的信任、成长型思维、对教学实践的认同以及课程参与这四个社会认知变量与学术表现和继续从事科学研究的意愿这两个长期以来期望的学生成果联系起来。该框架在被确定为具有高水平 EBPs 实施的课堂中进行了测试,涉及来自 14 名教师的 2102 名本科生的多机构样本。结果表明,在 EBP 背景下,总体上以及在代表性不足的学生群体中,认同框架是对大学生学习体验的有效描述。与学生的成长型思维水平相比,学生对教师的信任对他们对课程教学方式的认同的预测作用超过两倍,这表明学生对教师的看法与他们在高 EBPs 课程环境中的成功更为相关,而不是与他们对智力的看法相关。这项研究通过提供一个经过验证的学生认同框架,作为理解 EBPs 如何增强学生成果的视角,为转变本科 STEM 教育的对话做出了贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7be/8715782/27e76329dee5/cbe-20-ar54-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7be/8715782/e0ef12079eff/cbe-20-ar54-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7be/8715782/27e76329dee5/cbe-20-ar54-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7be/8715782/e0ef12079eff/cbe-20-ar54-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7be/8715782/27e76329dee5/cbe-20-ar54-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A Framework of College Student Buy-in to Evidence-Based Teaching Practices in STEM: The Roles of Trust and Growth Mindset.大学生对 STEM 领域循证教学实践的认同框架:信任和成长型思维的作用。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Dec;20(4):ar54. doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-08-0185.
2
An exploration of the relationship between active learning and student motivation in STEM: a mixed methods study.主动学习与 STEM 学生动机关系的探索:混合方法研究。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2024 Sep 1;48(3):621-638. doi: 10.1152/advan.00247.2022. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
3
Trust, Growth Mindset, and Student Commitment to Active Learning in a College Science Course.信任、成长型思维模式与大学生对大学理科课程主动学习的投入度。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Spring;17(1). doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-06-0107.
4
Creating inclusive classrooms by engaging STEM faculty in culturally responsive teaching workshops.通过让STEM学科教师参与文化响应式教学研讨会来创建包容性课堂。
Int J STEM Educ. 2020;7(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40594-020-00230-7. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
5
Does my professor think my ability can change? Students' perceptions of their STEM professors' mindset beliefs predict their psychological vulnerability, engagement, and performance in class.我的教授认为我的能力可以改变吗?学生对 STEM 教授思维模式信念的看法预测了他们在课堂上的心理脆弱性、参与度和表现。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Nov;149(11):2119-2144. doi: 10.1037/xge0000763. Epub 2020 May 7.
6
Using Pathway Modeling to Evaluate and Improve Student-Centered Teaching Practices in Co-Taught College Science Courses.运用路径建模评估和改进合作式大学理科课程中的以学生为中心的教学实践。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Jun;20(2):es5. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-07-0147.
7
Integrating Social Emotional Learning Strategies in Higher Education.将社会情感学习策略融入高等教育。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2020 Aug 26;10(3):848-858. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe10030061.
8
Description of Medical Students' Behavioral, Cognitive, and Psychological Engagement with Faculty Online Teaching Styles.医学生对教师在线教学风格的行为、认知和心理参与度描述
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2024 Feb 19;15:121-132. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S448779. eCollection 2024.
9
Roles matter: Graduate student perceptions of active learning in the STEM courses they take and those they teach.角色很重要:研究生对他们所修的 STEM 课程和所教课程中主动学习的看法。
Sci Prog. 2021 Oct;104(4):368504211033500. doi: 10.1177/00368504211033500.
10
Student Buy-In to Active Learning in a College Science Course.大学生对大学科学课程中主动学习的接受度。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Winter;15(4). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-07-0212.

本文引用的文献

1
Relationship quality in higher education and the interplay with student engagement and loyalty.高等教育中的关系质量及其与学生参与度和忠诚度的相互作用。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2022 Jun;92(2):e12455. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12455. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
2
Benefits of a College STEM Faculty Development Initiative: Instructors Report Increased and Sustained Implementation of Research-Based Instructional Strategies.大学STEM教师发展计划的益处:教师报告称基于研究的教学策略得到了更多且持续的实施。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2020 Jul 31;21(2). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v21i2.2127. eCollection 2020.
3
Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math.
主动学习缩小了本科阶段科学、技术、工程和数学领域代表性不足学生的成绩差距。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 24;117(12):6476-6483. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1916903117. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
4
Strategies to mitigate student resistance to active learning.减轻学生对主动学习抵触情绪的策略。
Int J STEM Educ. 2018;5(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0102-y. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
5
Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American universities.北美大学 STEM 教学的剖析。
Science. 2018 Mar 30;359(6383):1468-1470. doi: 10.1126/science.aap8892. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
6
Trust, Growth Mindset, and Student Commitment to Active Learning in a College Science Course.信任、成长型思维模式与大学生对大学理科课程主动学习的投入度。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Spring;17(1). doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-06-0107.
7
Do Growth Mindsets in Math Benefit Females? Identifying Pathways between Gender, Mindset, and Motivation.数学中的成长型思维模式对女性有益吗?识别性别、思维模式和动机之间的途径。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 May;47(5):976-990. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0739-8. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
8
Student anxiety in introductory biology classrooms: Perceptions about active learning and persistence in the major.生物学入门课堂上学生的焦虑情绪:对主动学习及专业坚持度的认知
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 3;12(8):e0182506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182506. eCollection 2017.
9
Student Buy-In to Active Learning in a College Science Course.大学生对大学科学课程中主动学习的接受度。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Winter;15(4). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-07-0212.
10
Characterizing Student Perceptions of and Buy-In toward Common Formative Assessment Techniques.描述学生对常见形成性评估技术的认知和接受程度。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 winter;15(4). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-03-0133.