• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

玻璃体内注射阿柏西普预防糖尿病视网膜病变进展的成本效益分析

A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Intravitreal Aflibercept for the Prevention of Progressive Diabetic Retinopathy.

作者信息

Patel Nimesh A, Yannuzzi Nicolas A, Lin James, Smiddy William E

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.

Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.

出版信息

Ophthalmol Retina. 2022 Mar;6(3):213-218. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2021.09.005. Epub 2021 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.oret.2021.09.005
PMID:34547529
Abstract

PURPOSE

To calculate costs required to prevent center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), and to improve the diabetic retinopathy severity score (DRSS) with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections, as reported for aflibercept in 2 randomized control trials.

DESIGN

Cost-effectiveness analysis modeling based on published data.

SUBJECTS

None.

METHODS

Results from PANORAMA and the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Protocol W were analyzed. Parameters collected included DRSS, risk reduction of PDR, risk reduction of CI-DME, and the number of treatments required. Costs were modeled based on 2020 Medicare reimbursement data practice settings of hospital-based facility and nonfacility.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cost to prevent cases of PDR and CI-DME and to improve DRSS stage.

RESULTS

Over 2 years in Protocol W, the cost required to prevent 1 case of PDR was $83 000 ($72 400) in the facility (nonfacility) setting; in PANORAMA, the corresponding 2-year costs were $89 400 ($75 000) for the 2-mg aflibercept every 16 weeks (2Q16) arm, and $91 200 ($89 900) for the 2-mg aflibercept every 8 weeks as needed (2Q8PRN) arm. To prevent 1 case of CI-DME with vision loss in Protocol W, the cost was $154 000 ($133 000). For all CI-DME, with and without vision loss, in PANORAMA, the costs to prevent a case were $70 900 ($59 500) for the 2Q16 arm and $90 000 ($88 800) for the 2Q8PRN arm. In Protocol W, the overall accumulated total for cost/DRSS unit change at the 2-year point for facility (nonfacility) setting was $2700 ($2400)/DRSS. In the first year alone, it was $2100 ($1800)/DRSS and in the second year, it was $6100 ($5300)/DRSS.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a considerable cost associated with the prevention of PDR and CI-DME with intravitreal aflibercept injections. A price per unit of change in DRSS is a new parameter that might serve as a benchmark in future utility analyses that could be used to bring the perspective to cost-utility considerations.

摘要

目的

如两项随机对照试验中阿柏西普的报告所示,计算预防与中心相关的糖尿病性黄斑水肿(CI-DME)或增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)所需的成本,以及通过玻璃体内注射抗VEGF改善糖尿病视网膜病变严重程度评分(DRSS)。

设计

基于已发表数据的成本效益分析模型。

研究对象

无。

方法

分析了PANORAMA试验和糖尿病视网膜病变临床研究网络方案W的结果。收集的参数包括DRSS、PDR风险降低、CI-DME风险降低以及所需治疗次数。成本基于2020年医疗保险报销数据,以医院设施和非设施的实际情况为模型。

主要观察指标

预防PDR和CI-DME病例以及改善DRSS分期的成本。

结果

在方案W的两年中,在设施(非设施)环境中预防1例PDR所需的成本为83000美元(72400美元);在PANORAMA试验中,每16周注射2毫克阿柏西普(2Q16)组的相应两年成本为89400美元(75000美元),按需每8周注射2毫克阿柏西普(2Q8PRN)组为91200美元(89900美元)。在方案W中,预防1例有视力丧失的CI-DME的成本为154000美元(133000美元)。对于PANORAMA试验中所有有或无视力丧失的CI-DME,2Q16组预防1例的成本为70900美元(59500美元),2Q8PRN组为90000美元(88800美元)。在方案W中,设施(非设施)环境下两年时成本/DRSS单位变化的总体累计总和为2700美元(2400美元)/DRSS。仅在第一年,为2100美元(1800美元)/DRSS,在第二年,为6100美元(5300美元)/DRSS。

结论

玻璃体内注射阿柏西普预防PDR和CI-DME存在相当高的成本。DRSS单位变化的成本是一个新参数,可能成为未来效用分析的基准,可用于将视角引入成本效用考量。

相似文献

1
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Intravitreal Aflibercept for the Prevention of Progressive Diabetic Retinopathy.玻璃体内注射阿柏西普预防糖尿病视网膜病变进展的成本效益分析
Ophthalmol Retina. 2022 Mar;6(3):213-218. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2021.09.005. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
2
Evaluation of Intravitreal Aflibercept for the Treatment of Severe Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: Results From the PANORAMA Randomized Clinical Trial.评价玻璃体内注射阿柏西普治疗严重非增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变:PANORAMA 随机临床试验结果。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep 1;139(9):946-955. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.2809.
3
Effect of Intravitreous Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor vs Sham Treatment for Prevention of Vision-Threatening Complications of Diabetic Retinopathy: The Protocol W Randomized Clinical Trial.玻璃体腔内抗血管内皮生长因子与假治疗预防糖尿病视网膜病变致盲性并发症的效果:方案 W 随机临床试验。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul 1;139(7):701-712. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.0606.
4
Four-Year Visual Outcomes in the Protocol W Randomized Trial of Intravitreous Aflibercept for Prevention of Vision-Threatening Complications of Diabetic Retinopathy.Protocol W 随机临床试验中玻璃体内注射阿柏西普预防糖尿病视网膜病变致盲性并发症的四年视觉结果。
JAMA. 2023 Feb 7;329(5):376-385. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.25029.
5
Aflibercept Monotherapy versus Bevacizumab-First for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Cost Analysis Based on Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Protocol AC Results.阿柏西普单药治疗与贝伐单抗一线治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:基于糖尿病视网膜病变临床研究网络协议 AC 结果的成本分析。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2023 May;7(5):413-419. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2022.11.010. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
6
Impact of baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale scores on visual outcomes in the VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME studies.基线糖尿病性视网膜病变严重程度评分对 VIVID-DME 和 VISTA-DME 研究中视力结局的影响。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul;102(7):954-958. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310664. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
7
Cost-effectiveness of Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema Treatment: Analysis From the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Comparative Effectiveness Trial.阿柏西普、贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的成本效益:来自糖尿病视网膜病变临床研究网络比较疗效试验的分析
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug 1;134(8):888-96. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.1669.
8
Baseline Factors Affecting Changes in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale Score After Intravitreal Aflibercept or Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema: Post Hoc Analyses from VISTA and VIVID.影响玻璃体内注射阿柏西普或激光治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿后糖尿病性视网膜病变严重程度评分变化的基线因素:来自 VISTA 和 VIVID 的事后分析。
Ophthalmology. 2018 Jan;125(1):51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.06.029. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
9
Effect of Aflibercept on Diabetic Retinopathy Severity and Visual Function in the RECOVERY Study for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.阿柏西普对增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变RECOVERY研究中糖尿病视网膜病变严重程度和视觉功能的影响。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2021 May;5(5):409-419. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.08.018. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
10
Cost-effectiveness of Aflibercept Monotherapy vs Bevacizumab First Followed by Aflibercept If Needed for Diabetic Macular Edema.阿柏西普单药治疗与贝伐单抗初始治疗后按需添加阿柏西普治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的成本效果分析。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar 1;141(3):268-274. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.6142.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of anti-VEGF drugs for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy.抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)药物治疗糖尿病性视网膜病变成本效益的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jan 29:1-19. doi: 10.3310/NHYK3694.
2
Utility Assessment of Follow-up Evaluation for Commotio Retinae.视网膜震荡随访评估的效用评估
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2024 Oct 12:24741264241281156. doi: 10.1177/24741264241281156.