理解动机性访谈干预对高血压或 2 型糖尿病患者整体生活方式改善的患者体验：一项定性焦点小组研究。
Understanding patient experiences in a motivational interviewing intervention to improve whole-person lifestyle among individuals with hypertension or type 2 diabetes: a qualitative focus group study.
机构信息
AdventHealth, Research Institute, Orlando, FL, USA.
出版信息
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021 Dec;16(1):1978373. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2021.1978373.
Abstract
PURPOSE
This qualitative focus group study aimed to determine how participants responded to a motivational interviewing intervention and to further explore how it impacted whole-person lifestyle of participants with hypertension or type 2 diabetes.
METHODS
Twenty participants attended one of five focus groups. A trained researcher led the one-hour focus groups using a semi-structured question guide. Responses were coded using thematic analysis and were then aggregated into six themes.
RESULTS
The following six themes emerged most consistently: (1) the importance of a coach who can connect meaningfully with participants; (2) appreciation of the whole-person approach; (3) the power of "choice" in making health behaviour changes; (4) the effectiveness of goal setting and accountability; (5) the desire for increased contact and follow-up; (6) overall positive experience with mixed clinical results.
CONCLUSION
Focus group themes highlighted that this intervention may empower individuals to feel confident in their choices and attain their goals during their health and wellness journey.
摘要
目的
本定性焦点小组研究旨在确定参与者对动机性访谈干预的反应，并进一步探讨其如何影响高血压或 2 型糖尿病患者的整体生活方式。
方法
20 名参与者参加了五个焦点小组中的一个。一名经过培训的研究人员使用半结构化问题指南主持了一个小时的焦点小组。使用主题分析对回答进行编码，然后将其汇总为六个主题。
结果
以下六个主题最一致地出现：（1）需要一位能够与参与者建立有意义联系的教练；（2）对整体方法的赞赏；（3）在做出健康行为改变时“选择”的力量；（4）设定目标和问责制的有效性；（5）增加联系和随访的愿望；（6）整体积极的体验和混合的临床结果。
结论
焦点小组主题强调，这种干预措施可能使个人在健康和健康之旅中感到有信心做出自己的选择并实现自己的目标。
相似文献
1
Understanding patient experiences in a motivational interviewing intervention to improve whole-person lifestyle among individuals with hypertension or type 2 diabetes: a qualitative focus group study.理解动机性访谈干预对高血压或 2 型糖尿病患者整体生活方式改善的患者体验：一项定性焦点小组研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021 Dec;16(1):1978373. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2021.1978373.
2
A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Motivational Interviewing Intervention to Improve Whole-Person Lifestyle.一项随机对照试验，研究动机式访谈干预对改善全人生活方式的效果。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720922714. doi: 10.1177/2150132720922714.
3
Motivational Interviewing in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Arterial Hypertension in Primary Health Care: An RCT.动机性访谈在基层医疗中 2 型糖尿病和动脉高血压管理中的应用：一项 RCT 研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 May;60(5):e203-e212. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.12.015. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
4
Experiences of Motivational Interviewing in Virtual Health-care Visits for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Qualitative Analysis.针对2型糖尿病成年患者的虚拟医疗就诊中动机性访谈的经验：一项定性分析
Can J Diabetes. 2024 Aug;48(6):355-363.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2024.04.008. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
5
How patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus respond to motivational interviewing.2 型糖尿病患者对动机性访谈的反应。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012 Jan;95(1):37-41. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.08.011. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
6
Testing a modified motivational interviewing counseling program.测试一个经过改良的动机性访谈咨询方案。
J Prof Nurs. 2024 Mar-Apr;51:90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.02.008. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
7
Motivational interviewing and problem solving treatment to reduce type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk in real life: a randomized controlled trial.动机性访谈和问题解决治疗在现实生活中降低 2 型糖尿病和心血管疾病风险的随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Apr 19;10:47. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-47.
8
Effectiveness of motivational interviewing on improving Care for Patients with type 2 diabetes in China: A randomized controlled trial.动机性访谈对改善中国 2 型糖尿病患者护理效果的随机对照试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 23;20(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4776-8.
9
Effectiveness of behaviour change techniques on lifestyle interventions of patients with a high risk of developing cardiovascular disease. Using a qualitative approach.行为改变技术对有发生心血管疾病高危风险的患者生活方式干预的效果。采用定性方法。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 May;28(3):998-1009. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12933. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
10
Health Coaching in Severe COPD After a Hospitalization: A Qualitative Analysis of a Large Randomized Study.住院后重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的健康指导：一项大型随机研究的定性分析
Respir Care. 2017 Nov;62(11):1403-1411. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05574.
引用本文的文献
1
Improving Retention and HIV Viral Suppression: A Cluster Randomised Pilot Trial of a Lay Counsellor Motivational Interviewing Training in South Africa.提高留存率和艾滋病毒病毒抑制率：南非一项关于外行人咨询员动机性访谈培训的整群随机试点试验。
medRxiv. 2024 Sep 23:2024.09.20.24314048. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.20.24314048.
2
Behavioral approaches to nutrition and eating patterns for managing type 2 diabetes: A review.用于管理2型糖尿病的营养和饮食模式的行为方法：综述
Am J Med Open. 2023 Jan 28;9:100034. doi: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100034. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Acceptability of Mobile App-Based Motivational Interviewing and Preferences for App Features to Support Self-Management in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Qualitative Study.基于移动应用的动机性访谈的可接受性以及支持2型糖尿病患者自我管理的应用功能偏好：定性研究
JMIR Diabetes. 2024 Mar 6;9:e48310. doi: 10.2196/48310.
本文引用的文献
1
A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Motivational Interviewing Intervention to Improve Whole-Person Lifestyle.一项随机对照试验，研究动机式访谈干预对改善全人生活方式的效果。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720922714. doi: 10.1177/2150132720922714.
2
Association of Cardiovascular Disease With Premature Mortality in the United States.心血管疾病与美国的过早死亡率相关。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Dec 1;4(12):1230-1238. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.3891.
3
Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing on adult behaviour change in health and social care settings: A systematic review of reviews.动机性访谈在健康和社会保健环境中对成人行为改变的效果：系统综述。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 18;13(10):e0204890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204890. eCollection 2018.
4
Goal-setting in diabetes self-management: A systematic review and meta-analysis examining content and effectiveness of goal-setting interventions.糖尿病自我管理中的目标设定：系统评价和荟萃分析，考察目标设定干预的内容和效果。
Psychol Health. 2018 Aug;33(8):955-977. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2018.1432760. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
5
Effectiveness of motivational interviewing for improving physical activity self-management for adults with type 2 diabetes: A review.动机性访谈对改善2型糖尿病成年人身体活动自我管理的有效性：一项综述。
Chronic Illn. 2018 Mar;14(1):54-68. doi: 10.1177/1742395317699449. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
6
The Impact of Social Support on Self-care of Patients With Diabetes: What Is the Effect of Diabetes Type? Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.社会支持对糖尿病患者自我护理的影响：糖尿病类型的影响是什么？系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Educ. 2017 Aug;43(4):396-412. doi: 10.1177/0145721717712457. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
7
CVD Prevention Through Policy: a Review of Mass Media, Food/Menu Labeling, Taxation/Subsidies, Built Environment, School Procurement, Worksite Wellness, and Marketing Standards to Improve Diet.通过政策预防心血管疾病：对大众媒体、食品/菜单标签、税收/补贴、建筑环境、学校采购、工作场所健康促进以及营销标准改善饮食的综述
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015 Nov;17(11):98. doi: 10.1007/s11886-015-0658-9.
8
A systematic review of motivational interviewing for weight loss among adults in primary care.一项针对初级保健中成年人体重减轻的动机性访谈的系统评价。
Obes Rev. 2015 Apr;16(4):304-18. doi: 10.1111/obr.12264. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
9
Systematic review of impact of lifestyle-modification programs on metabolic risks and patient-reported outcomes in adults with metabolic syndrome.系统评价生活方式改变项目对代谢综合征成人代谢风险和患者报告结局的影响。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2014 Dec;11(6):361-8. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12069.
10
Behavioral counseling to promote a healthful diet and physical activity for cardiovascular disease prevention in adults with cardiovascular risk factors: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.行为咨询以促进有心血管危险因素的成年人心血管疾病预防的健康饮食和身体活动：美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Oct 21;161(8):587-93. doi: 10.7326/M14-1796.
Zotero 插件