ANDROFERT, Andrology and Human Reproduction Clinic, Campinas, Brazil; Department of Surgery (Division of Urology), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Unit of Genetics, Department of Biology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Fertil Steril. 2022 Jan;117(1):64-73. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.08.045. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
To investigate the intraindividual agreement of the sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) assay results to assess sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) in men with infertility.
Diagnostic test reliability study.
Andrology laboratories.
PATIENT(S): A total of 219 men with infertility.
INTERVENTION(S): Sperm DNA fragmentation assessment in two ejaculates of the same subjects within a 3-month interval, using the SCD assay performed and analyzed by the same observers under similar testing conditions.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cohen's κ statistics to assess the degree of agreement between the pairs of results after converting the nominal SCD values into categorical data, that is, normal (<20%), intermediate (21%-29%), and high (≥30%) SDF rates. We also assessed the pairs of results using reliability measures for numerical variables (intraclass correlation coefficient for consistency using the two-way mixed-effects model and Bland-Altman plots).
RESULT(S): The degree of agreement in classifying patients according to normal and pathological SDF classes was overall substantial (κ = 0.632; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.546-0.718). A total of 76.7% of individuals were classified under the same class using paired ejaculates. The agreement rate was highest (approximately 80%) in ejaculates initially classified as either normal or high and lowest (approximately 60%) among those with intermediate SDF levels. The frequency of intermediate SDF ejaculates downgraded to normal or upgrade to high SDF classes in the second test was similar (approximately 20%). The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.856 (95% CI, 0.812-0.887), and the mean difference between the pairs of observations was 0.80% (95% CI, -0.72 to 2.23), indicating no systematic difference between paired observations.
CONCLUSION(S): Our study indicates a substantial intraindividual agreement of paired SCD assay results to classify men with infertility into three SDF categories: normal, intermediate, and high. The reliability of the SCD assay was adequate and exceeded 0.80 using two ejaculates analyzed within a 3-month interval under similar conditions. Although this evidence overall supports a single SCD test for patient classification using predefined SDF thresholds, particularly when the first test shows normal or high SDF levels, one in four men will have discordant values in paired ejaculates. Clinicians should be judicious when using SDF test results in decision-making.
研究精子染色质扩散(SCD)检测结果的个体内一致性,以评估不育男性的精子 DNA 碎片化(SDF)。
诊断测试可靠性研究。
男科实验室。
共 219 名不育男性。
在 3 个月的时间内,对同一受试者的两份精液样本进行 SDF 评估,使用 SCD 检测,并由同一位观察者在相似的检测条件下进行分析。
采用 Cohen's κ 统计量评估将名义 SCD 值转换为分类数据(正常(<20%)、中等(21%-29%)和高(≥30%)SDF 率)后,对结果进行两两比较的一致性程度。我们还使用数值变量的可靠性测量方法(使用双向混合效应模型的一致性的组内相关系数和 Bland-Altman 图)对结果进行了两两比较。
根据正常和病理性 SDF 分类,对患者进行分类的一致性程度总体上较高(κ=0.632;95%置信区间[CI],0.546-0.718)。使用配对精液样本,76.7%的个体被归入同一类别。最初分类为正常或高的精液样本的一致性率最高(约 80%),而中间 SDF 水平的精液样本的一致性率最低(约 60%)。第二次检测中,中间 SDF 级别的精液样本降级为正常或升级为高 SDF 级别的频率相似(约 20%)。组内相关系数为 0.856(95%CI,0.812-0.887),观察值之间的平均差异为 0.80%(95%CI,-0.72 至 2.23),表明配对观察值之间没有系统差异。
我们的研究表明,配对 SCD 检测结果在将不育男性分为三个 SDF 类别(正常、中等和高)方面具有显著的个体内一致性。SCD 检测的可靠性充足,在相似条件下,使用 3 个月内分析的两份精液样本,其值超过 0.80。尽管这一证据总体上支持使用预设的 SDF 阈值对患者进行单次 SCD 检测分类,但对于第一次检测显示正常或高 SDF 水平的患者尤其如此,仍有四分之一的男性在两份精液样本中会出现不一致的结果。临床医生在使用 SDF 检测结果进行决策时应谨慎。