Ford James S, Chechi Tasleem, Otmar Michella, Baker Melissa, Waldman Sarah, Morgan Brittany, Tan David, Tran Nam K, May Larissa
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, California, USA.
Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Emerg Med J. 2021 Sep 21. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210331.
The prevalence of syphilis is increasing in many countries, including the USA. The ED is often used by underserved populations, making it an important setting to test and treat patients who are not evaluated in outpatient clinical settings. We aimed to assess the utility of an ED-based syphilis and gonorrhoea/chlamydia cotesting protocol by comparing testing practices before and after its implementation.
We implemented an electronic health record (EHR) alert that prompted clinicians to order syphilis testing in patients undergoing gonorrhoea/chlamydia testing. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis that compared outcomes between the preimplementation period (January-November 2018) and the postimplementation period (January-November 2019). Patients were tested for antibody (TPA) using a multiplex flow immunoassay (MFI), and positive results were confirmed by rapid plasma reagin (RPR). The primary implementation outcome was the number of syphilis tests/month, and the primary clinical outcome was the number of syphilis diagnoses/month (defined as positive TPA MFI and RPR). We performed an interrupted time-series analysis to evaluate the effect of implementing the alert over time.
Four-hundred and ninety-four and 1106 unique patients were tested for syphilis in the preimplementation and postimplementation periods, respectively. Syphilis testing increased by 55.6 tests/month (95% CI 45.9 to 65.3, p<0.001) following alert implementation. Patients tested in the postimplementation period who were tested using the alert were much younger (difference: 14 years (95% CI 12 to 15)) and were more likely to be female (difference: 15% (95% CI 8 to 21)) and African-American (difference: 11% (95% CI 5 to 17)) than patients tested by clinician-initiated testing. Presumptive syphilis diagnoses increased from 3.4 diagnoses/month to 7.9 diagnoses/month (difference, 4.5 (95% CI 2.2 to 6.9), p<0.001).
Our study demonstrates that use of a targeted EHR alert testing protocol can increase syphilis testing and diagnosis and may reduce clinician bias in testing.
包括美国在内的许多国家梅毒患病率都在上升。急诊科经常接待服务不足人群,这使其成为检测和治疗未在门诊临床环境中接受评估的患者的重要场所。我们旨在通过比较基于急诊科的梅毒和淋病/衣原体联合检测方案实施前后的检测情况,评估该方案的效用。
我们实施了一项电子健康记录(EHR)警报,提示临床医生对接受淋病/衣原体检测的患者进行梅毒检测。我们进行了一项回顾性队列分析,比较了实施前时期(2018年1月至11月)和实施后时期(2019年1月至11月)的结果。使用多重流式免疫测定法(MFI)检测患者的抗体(TPA),阳性结果通过快速血浆反应素(RPR)确认。主要实施结果是每月梅毒检测次数,主要临床结果是每月梅毒诊断次数(定义为TPA MFI和RPR阳性)。我们进行了中断时间序列分析,以评估随着时间推移实施警报的效果。
实施前和实施后时期分别有494例和1106例独特患者接受了梅毒检测。实施警报后,梅毒检测每月增加55.6次(95%可信区间45.9至65.3,p<0.001)。与临床医生发起检测的患者相比,在实施后时期使用警报进行检测的患者年龄更小(差异:14岁(95%可信区间12至15)),女性比例更高(差异:15%(95%可信区间8至21)),非裔美国人比例更高(差异:11%(95%可信区间5至17))。推定梅毒诊断从每月3.4例增加到每月7.9例(差异,4.5(95%可信区间2.2至6.9),p<0.001)。
我们的研究表明,使用有针对性的电子健康记录警报检测方案可以增加梅毒检测和诊断,并可能减少临床医生在检测中的偏差。