Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情及其他真正治疗惰性预测因素对泰国一家基层医疗诊所高血压患者的影响。

Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Predictors of True Therapeutic Inertia on Patients with Hypertension in a Primary Care Clinic in Thailand.

作者信息

Sornsenee Phoomjai, Vichitkunakorn Polathep, Choomalee Kittisakdi, Romyasamit Chonticha

机构信息

Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.

Department of Medical Technology, School of Allied Health Sciences, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand.

出版信息

Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Sep 13;14:3807-3816. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S327644. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hypertension (HT) has a significant impact on health care worldwide. Therapeutic inertia (TI) is defined as the failure to intensify therapy in the absence of an optimal goal and is widely used as a quality of care parameter. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected many health-care systems, including HT care. Therefore, the present study assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on TI and its predictors in patients with HT.

METHODS

The electronic medical records of patients with HT who attended a primary care clinic at a tertiary hospital during pre-COVID-19 (February 2019 to February 2020) and COVID-19 (March to August 2020) periods were reviewed.

RESULTS

Our study included 6089 visits during the 12-month pre-COVID-19 period and 2852 visits during the 6-month COVID-19 period. Most of the baseline characteristics of the HT patients were not significantly different between the two time periods. During the COVID-19 period, the percentage of uncontrolled HT visits decreased from 43% to 31%. Similarly, the prevalence of TI decreased from 81% to 77%. False TI was predominantly due to physicians' concerns regarding the in-clinic blood pressure measurement being inaccurate during both the periods.

CONCLUSION

After readjustment for the physicians 'reasons, the true TI was 64% and 60% in the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 period. For adjusted physician and patient-related factors, multilevel modeling was used. Senior medical staff visits, elderly patients, prior diabetes mellitus diagnosis, patients who used more than one type of anti-HT medication, and patients with systolic blood pressure >150 mmHg were all predictors of TI. The COVID-19 period, on the other hand had no effect on TI with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.67-1.01).

摘要

引言

高血压对全球医疗保健产生重大影响。治疗惰性(TI)被定义为在未达到最佳目标的情况下未能强化治疗,并且被广泛用作医疗质量参数。2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行已经影响了许多医疗保健系统,包括高血压护理。因此,本研究评估了COVID-19大流行对高血压患者治疗惰性及其预测因素的影响。

方法

回顾了在COVID-19之前(2019年2月至2020年2月)和COVID-19期间(2020年3月至8月)在一家三级医院的初级保健诊所就诊的高血压患者的电子病历。

结果

我们的研究包括COVID-19之前12个月期间的6089次就诊和COVID-19期间6个月的2852次就诊。两个时间段高血压患者的大多数基线特征没有显著差异。在COVID-19期间,未控制的高血压就诊百分比从43%降至31%。同样,治疗惰性患病率从81%降至77%。假性治疗惰性主要是由于两个时期医生都担心诊所内血压测量不准确。

结论

在对医生的原因进行调整后,COVID-19之前和COVID-19期间的真实治疗惰性分别为64%和60%。对于调整后的医生和患者相关因素,使用了多水平模型。高级医务人员就诊、老年患者、先前糖尿病诊断、使用一种以上抗高血压药物的患者以及收缩压>150 mmHg的患者都是治疗惰性的预测因素。另一方面,COVID-19期间对治疗惰性没有影响,调整后的优势比为0.82(95%置信区间,0.67 - 1.01)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验