Barut Tugtekin Esra, Dursun Ozcan Ozgur
Distance Education Application and Research Center, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Faculty of Education, Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technology, Anadolu University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022;27(3):3247-3276. doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10735-5. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
One of the objectives of this research is to develop and validate the Instructional Material Motivation Scale for Single-Use (IMMS-SU) instrument in the Turkish context. The IMMS-SU was developed and validated in a two-phased process on a sample of 1654 students. The Exploratory Factor Analysis revealed that IMMS-SU included 14 items (χ2 = 332.59; sd = 74; p < 0.001), the fitness indices were found to be RMSEA = .077; SRMR = .040; AGFI = .88; NFI = .95; CFI = .96; and GFI = .92. The Cronbach's Alpha coefficients regarding the whole scale was calculated as α = 0.95. Thereafter, in the second study, the animated and interactive video materials used in distance education were scrutinized in the context of openness to different materials, time spent viewing, motivation, and cognitive load. A total of 933 students participated who had a distance education experience. In order to collect data, the extraneous cognitive load instrument (Kalyuga et al., (1), 1-17, Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1998). Levels of expertise and instructional design. Human Factors, 40(1), 1-17. 10.1518/001872098779480587), IMMS-SU, and questionnaire items were used. According to the findings, it was determined that animation and interactive video materials did not cause a higher level of cognitive load on the participants, and both groups had higher material motivation. In addition, it was revealed that interactive video materials caused a higher extraneous cognitive load in participants than animation group. It was figured out that as the openness levels of the participants watching the animation and interactive materials decreased, their cognitive load levels increased. In the light of the results, some suggestions have been recommended for further research.
本研究的目标之一是在土耳其背景下开发并验证一次性使用教学材料动机量表(IMMS-SU)工具。IMMS-SU是在一个两阶段的过程中针对1654名学生的样本进行开发和验证的。探索性因素分析表明,IMMS-SU包含14个项目(χ2 = 332.59;标准差 = 74;p < 0.001),拟合指数为RMSEA = 0.077;SRMR = 0.040;AGFI = 0.88;NFI = 0.95;CFI = 0.96;GFI = 0.92。整个量表的克朗巴哈α系数计算为α = 0.95。此后,在第二项研究中,在对不同材料的开放性、观看时间、动机和认知负荷的背景下,对远程教育中使用的动画和交互式视频材料进行了审查。共有933名有远程教育经历的学生参与。为了收集数据,使用了无关认知负荷工具(卡柳加等人,(1),1 - 17,卡柳加,S.,钱德勒,P.,& 斯韦勒,J.(1998)。专业水平与教学设计。《人类因素》,40(1),1 - 17。10.1518/001872098779480587)、IMMS-SU和问卷项目。根据研究结果,确定动画和交互式视频材料不会给参与者带来更高水平的认知负荷,并且两组都有更高的材料动机。此外,还发现交互式视频材料比动画组给参与者带来更高的无关认知负荷。结果表明,随着观看动画和交互式材料的参与者的开放性水平降低,他们的认知负荷水平会增加。根据这些结果,为进一步研究提出了一些建议。