• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

残余定量血流比评估经皮冠状动脉介入术后的血流储备分数。

Residual Quantitative Flow Ratio to Estimate Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Aug 31;2021:4339451. doi: 10.1155/2021/4339451. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1155/2021/4339451
PMID:34548847
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8426071/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) computes fractional flow reserve (FFR) based on invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Residual QFR estimates post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) FFR. This study sought to assess the relationship of residual QFR with post-PCI FFR.

METHODS

Residual QFR analysis, using pre-PCI ICA, was attempted in 159 vessels with post-PCI FFR. QFR lesion location was matched with the PCI location to simulate the performed intervention and allow computation of residual QFR. A post-PCI FFR < 0.90 was used to define a suboptimal PCI result.

RESULTS

Residual QFR computation was successful in 128 (81%) vessels. Median residual QFR was higher than post-PCI FFR (0.96 Q1-Q3: 0.91-0.99 vs. 0.91 Q1-Q3: 0.86-0.96, < 0.001). A significant correlation and agreement were observed between residual QFR and post-PCI FFR ( = 0.56 and intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.47, < 0.001 for both). Following PCI, an FFR < 0.90 was observed in 54 (42%) vessels. Specificity, positive predictive value, sensitivity, and negative predictive value of residual QFR for assessment of the PCI result were 96% (95% confidence interval (CI): 87-99%), 89% (95% CI: 72-96%), 44% (95% CI: 31-59%), and 70% (95% CI: 65-75%), respectively. Residual QFR had an accuracy of 74% (95% CI: 66-82%) and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.71-0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant correlation and agreement between residual QFR and post-PCI FFR were observed. Residual QFR ≥ 0.90 did not necessarily commensurate with a satisfactory PCI (post-PCI FFR ≥ 0.90). In contrast, residual QFR exhibited a high specificity for prediction of a suboptimal PCI result.

摘要

目的

定量血流比(QFR)基于有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)计算血流储备分数(FFR)。残余 QFR 估计经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的 FFR。本研究旨在评估残余 QFR 与 PCI 后 FFR 的关系。

方法

对 159 个有 PCI 后 FFR 的血管进行残余 QFR 分析,使用 PCI 前 ICA。将 QFR 病变位置与 PCI 位置匹配,模拟进行的干预,允许计算残余 QFR。将 PCI 后 FFR<0.90 定义为 PCI 结果不理想。

结果

128 个(81%)血管成功进行了残余 QFR 计算。中位残余 QFR 高于 PCI 后 FFR(0.96 Q1-Q3:0.91-0.99 比 0.91 Q1-Q3:0.86-0.96,<0.001)。残余 QFR 与 PCI 后 FFR 之间存在显著相关性和一致性(=0.56 和组内相关系数=0.47,均<0.001)。PCI 后,54 个(42%)血管的 FFR<0.90。残余 QFR 评估 PCI 结果的特异性、阳性预测值、敏感性和阴性预测值分别为 96%(95%CI:87-99%)、89%(95%CI:72-96%)、44%(95%CI:31-59%)和 70%(95%CI:65-75%)。残余 QFR 的准确性为 74%(95%CI:66-82%),受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.79(95%CI:0.71-0.86)。

结论

残余 QFR 与 PCI 后 FFR 之间存在显著相关性和一致性。残余 QFR≥0.90 并不一定等同于满意的 PCI(PCI 后 FFR≥0.90)。相反,残余 QFR 对预测不理想的 PCI 结果具有很高的特异性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a727/8426071/13db3e2cbb8e/JITC2021-4339451.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a727/8426071/1b4f329d1b2e/JITC2021-4339451.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a727/8426071/05b3d0d0fd44/JITC2021-4339451.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a727/8426071/40795fcffa14/JITC2021-4339451.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a727/8426071/67ceeaf420e8/JITC2021-4339451.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a727/8426071/39161cbf23f3/JITC2021-4339451.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a727/8426071/13db3e2cbb8e/JITC2021-4339451.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a727/8426071/1b4f329d1b2e/JITC2021-4339451.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a727/8426071/05b3d0d0fd44/JITC2021-4339451.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a727/8426071/40795fcffa14/JITC2021-4339451.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a727/8426071/67ceeaf420e8/JITC2021-4339451.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a727/8426071/39161cbf23f3/JITC2021-4339451.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a727/8426071/13db3e2cbb8e/JITC2021-4339451.006.jpg

相似文献

1
Residual Quantitative Flow Ratio to Estimate Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve.残余定量血流比评估经皮冠状动脉介入术后的血流储备分数。
J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Aug 31;2021:4339451. doi: 10.1155/2021/4339451. eCollection 2021.
2
Quantitative flow ratio virtual stenting and post stenting correlations to post stenting fractional flow reserve measurements from the DOCTORS (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting) study population.定量血流比虚拟支架和支架置入后与 DOCTORS 研究人群支架置入后分数流量储备测量的相关性(光学相干断层成像是否优化支架治疗结果)。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;96(6):1145-1153. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28615. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
3
Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography: The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study.快速计算方法从诊断性冠状动脉造影中获得血流储备分数的诊断准确性:国际多中心 FAVOR 初步研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct 10;9(19):2024-2035. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.013.
4
Prediction of functional results of percutaneous coronary interventions with virtual stenting and quantitative flow ratio.应用虚拟支架和定量血流比值预测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的功能结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Dec;100(7):1208-1217. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30451. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
5
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of immediate angiography derived residual quantitative flow ratio after bioresorbable scaffold and drug eluting stent implantation.生物可吸收支架和药物洗脱支架置入后即刻血管造影衍生的残余定量血流比的诊断准确性比较。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 12;23(2):59. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2302059.
6
Comparison of coronary CT angiography-based and invasive coronary angiography-based quantitative flow ratio for functional assessment of coronary stenosis: A multicenter retrospective analysis.基于冠状动脉CT血管造影和基于有创冠状动脉血管造影的定量血流比用于冠状动脉狭窄功能评估的比较:一项多中心回顾性分析。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2022 Nov-Dec;16(6):509-516. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2022.06.002. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
7
Diagnostic Performance of In-Procedure Angiography-Derived Quantitative Flow Reserve Compared to Pressure-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: The FAVOR II Europe-Japan Study.术中血管造影衍生的定量血流储备与压力衍生的分数流量储备的诊断性能比较:FAVOR II 欧洲-日本研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jul 6;7(14):e009603. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009603.
8
Physiological Distribution and Local Severity of Coronary Artery Disease and Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.生理分布与冠状动脉疾病的局部严重程度及其经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Aug 23;14(16):1771-1785. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.06.013.
9
Accuracy and reproducibility of fast fractional flow reserve computation from invasive coronary angiography.基于有创冠状动脉造影的快速血流储备分数计算的准确性和可重复性。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Sep;33(9):1305-1312. doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1190-3. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
10
Post-PCI outcomes predicted by pre-intervention simulation of residual quantitative flow ratio using augmented reality.使用增强现实技术对残余定量血流分数进行术前模拟预测 PCI 术后结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2022 Apr 1;352:33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.01.054. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes from Quantitative Flow Ratio-Guided Complete Revascularization and Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者定量血流比引导下完全血运重建与血管造影引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Jun 15;31:e948085. doi: 10.12659/MSM.948085.
2
Biomechanical factors and atherosclerosis localization: insights and clinical applications.生物力学因素与动脉粥样硬化定位:见解与临床应用
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jul 25;11:1392702. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1392702. eCollection 2024.
3
Influence of Pathophysiologic Patterns of Coronary Artery Disease on Immediate Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Poststenting Fractional Flow Reserve on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes: The FFR-SEARCH Study.支架术后血流储备分数对长期临床结局的影响:FFR-SEARCH 研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Mar;14(3):e009681. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009681. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
2
Invasive Coronary Physiology After Stent Implantation: Another Step Toward Precision Medicine.支架植入术后的冠状动脉生理学:迈向精准医疗的又一步。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 8;14(3):237-246. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.055.
3
On-Site Computed Tomography Versus Angiography Alone to Guide Coronary Stent Implantation: A Prospective Randomized Study.
冠状动脉疾病病理生理模式对即刻经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结局的影响。
Circulation. 2024 Aug 20;150(8):586-597. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069450. Epub 2024 May 14.
4
Predictive value of the inconsistency between the residual and post-PCI QFR for prognosis in PCI patients.PCI患者中残余与PCI术后QFR不一致对预后的预测价值。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Apr 17;11:1297218. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1297218. eCollection 2024.
5
Consensus document on the clinical application of invasive functional coronary angiography from the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.日本心血管介入治疗协会关于有创功能冠状动脉造影临床应用的共识文件。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024 Apr;39(2):109-125. doi: 10.1007/s12928-024-00988-5. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
6
Validation of Quantitative Flow Ratio-Derived Virtual Angioplasty with Post-Angioplasty Fractional Flow Reserve-The QIMERA-I Study.定量血流比率衍生的虚拟血管成形术与血管成形术后血流储备分数的验证——QIMERA-I研究
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Dec 31;11(1):14. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11010014.
7
Practical Application of Coronary Physiologic Assessment: Asia-Pacific Expert Consensus Document: Part 1.冠状动脉生理评估的实际应用:亚太专家共识文件:第1部分。
JACC Asia. 2023 Aug 29;3(5):689-706. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.07.003. eCollection 2023 Oct.
8
Applied coronary physiology for planning and guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions. A clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the European Society of Cardiology.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的应用冠状动脉生理学:欧洲心脏病学会欧洲经皮心血管介入协会(EAPCI)的临床共识声明。
EuroIntervention. 2023 Aug 21;19(6):464-481. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00194.
现场计算机断层扫描与单独血管造影引导冠状动脉支架置入术:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2020 Nov;32(11):E268-E276. doi: 10.25270/jic/20.00156. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
4
Prognostic Implications of Post-Intervention Resting Pd/Pa and Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stent Implantation.支架植入术后静息Pd/Pa及血流储备分数的预后意义
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Aug 24;13(16):1920-1933. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.05.042.
5
Role of Post-Stent Physiological Assessment in a Risk Prediction Model After Coronary Stent Implantation.支架置入术后生理评估在冠状动脉支架置入术后风险预测模型中的作用。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul 27;13(14):1639-1650. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.041.
6
Comparison Between the Performance of Quantitative Flow Ratio and Perfusion Imaging for Diagnosing Myocardial Ischemia.定量血流比与灌注成像诊断心肌缺血的性能比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Sep;13(9):1976-1985. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.02.012. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
7
Quantitative flow ratio virtual stenting and post stenting correlations to post stenting fractional flow reserve measurements from the DOCTORS (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting) study population.定量血流比虚拟支架和支架置入后与 DOCTORS 研究人群支架置入后分数流量储备测量的相关性(光学相干断层成像是否优化支架治疗结果)。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;96(6):1145-1153. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28615. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
8
2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes.2019年欧洲心脏病学会慢性冠状动脉综合征诊断和管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407-477. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425.
9
Routine Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后常规测量分流量储备。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May;12(5):e007428. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007428.
10
Diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio in prospectively enrolled patients: An individual patient-data meta-analysis.前瞻性纳入患者中定量血流比的诊断性能:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 1;94(5):693-701. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28283. Epub 2019 Apr 9.