Sambrook P N, Eisman J A, Furler S M, Pocock N A
Garvan Institute of Medical Research, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
J Bone Miner Res. 1987 Apr;2(2):109-14. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650020205.
Controversy exists about rates of bone mineral loss from the lumbar spine at the menopause. Cross-sectional studies of lumbar bone mineral against age have been interpreted as evidence for or against a menopause-related change in lumbar bone loss, depending on their goodness of fit to either linear or nonlinear equations. To investigate the ability of cross-sectional studies to detect accelerated lumbar bone loss at the menopause, we constructed models of different patterns of loss and evaluated the findings in cross-sectional analyses of computer-simulated populations of normal women. A sample size of greater than 300 was needed to distinguish between linear and nonlinear patterns of bone loss with a power of 90% when the data was analyzed throughout life. Examining for differences between the slopes of the regressions of pre- and postmenopausal women was more useful for detecting nonlinear bone loss under some circumstances. A difference between slopes was apparent in studies containing 100 subjects if lumbar bone density (BMD) was assumed to be unchanged prior to the menopause, but a larger study size was needed (greater than 1000) if BMD was assumed to fall before the menopause. We also measured lumbar BMD by dual photon absorptiometry in 141 normal females. When the data was analyzed against age throughout life, a nonlinear pattern of bone loss was found, and comparison of pre- and postmenopausal subjects showed a significant difference in the slopes of the linear regressions. Our patient data support the concept of a relatively stable lumbar BMD prior to the menopause with a rapid but transient decline postmenopausally.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
关于绝经后腰椎骨矿物质流失的速率存在争议。根据腰椎骨矿物质与年龄的横断面研究与线性或非线性方程的拟合优度,其被解释为支持或反对绝经相关的腰椎骨量变化的证据。为了研究横断面研究检测绝经后腰椎骨量加速流失的能力,我们构建了不同流失模式的模型,并在对正常女性计算机模拟人群的横断面分析中评估了研究结果。当对一生的数据进行分析时,需要大于300的样本量才能以90%的检验效能区分线性和非线性骨量流失模式。在某些情况下,检查绝经前和绝经后女性回归斜率的差异对于检测非线性骨量流失更有用。如果假设绝经前腰椎骨密度(BMD)不变,在包含100名受试者的研究中斜率差异明显,但如果假设绝经前BMD下降,则需要更大的研究样本量(大于1000)。我们还通过双能光子吸收法测量了141名正常女性的腰椎BMD。当对一生的数据按年龄进行分析时,发现了非线性骨量流失模式,绝经前和绝经后受试者的比较显示线性回归斜率存在显著差异。我们的患者数据支持绝经前腰椎BMD相对稳定、绝经后迅速但短暂下降的概念。(摘要截短至250字)