• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将主治医生的角色集中在收治或查房上,有利于基于单元的分配,并与提高出院效率相关。

Focusing hospitalist roles on either admitting or rounding facilitates unit-based assignment and is associated with improved discharge efficiency.

机构信息

Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Hosp Pract (1995). 2021 Dec;49(5):371-375. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2021.1985316. Epub 2021 Oct 6.

DOI:10.1080/21548331.2021.1985316
PMID:34551664
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Unit-based teams may improve care delivery for hospitalized patients but can be challenging to implement broadly across all acute care units in a hospital.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of a Lean-guided transition to hospital-wide unit-based assignment on care delivery outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study was a retrospective time-series with primary outcomes of discharge efficiency, 30-day readmissions, and length of stay, performed at a 336-bed tertiary academic referral hospital in the Pacific Northwest with approximately 17,000 admissions annually.

INTERVENTION

Implementation of a Lean-guided quality improvement intervention included division of hospitalist duties into 'admitters' and 'rounders,' with simulated patient flow exercises to determine the optimal staffing model.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Discharge efficiency (number of patients discharged by hospitalists divided by the number of hospitalist patient encounter days per month) and 30-day readmissions were compared using the t-test or chi-square, and length of stay was analyzed in a multivariate time-series regression model.

RESULTS

The intervention was associated with a significant improvement in discharge efficiency, by 0.014 (from 0.168 to 0.181) discharges/encounter (95% CI = 0.024, 0.004), p = 0.009. Mean length of stay decreased by 0.98 days (95% CI 0.50, 1.47) after adjustment for patient age, patient type (medical versus surgical), critical care admissions, and discharge disposition, without a corresponding change in 30-day readmission rate (12.2% (1948/15,902) pre-intervention to 11.7% (397/3379) post-intervention (p = 0.42)).

CONCLUSIONS

Dividing hospitalist roles into admitters and rounders enabled implementation of unit-based teams across the hospital, with corresponding improvements in discharge efficiency and length of stay.

摘要

背景

基于单元的团队可以改善住院患者的护理服务,但在医院内所有急症护理单元广泛实施可能具有挑战性。

目的

确定向全院基于单元的分配转变的精益指导对护理服务结果的影响。

设计、设置和参与者:这项研究是一项回顾性时间序列研究,主要结局为出院效率、30 天再入院率和住院时间,在西北太平洋地区的一家拥有 336 张床位的三级学术转诊医院进行,每年约有 17000 名患者入院。

干预措施

实施精益指导的质量改进干预措施,包括将医院医生的职责分为“接诊医生”和“巡诊医生”,并进行模拟患者流程练习,以确定最佳人员配备模式。

主要结果和测量

使用 t 检验或卡方检验比较出院效率(由医院医生出院的患者数量除以每月医院医生患者就诊天数)和 30 天再入院率,使用多元时间序列回归模型分析住院时间。

结果

干预措施与出院效率的显著提高相关,提高了 0.014(从 0.168 提高到 0.181)次/次就诊(95%CI=0.024,0.004),p=0.009。调整患者年龄、患者类型(内科与外科)、重症监护入院和出院处置后,平均住院时间缩短了 0.98 天(95%CI 0.50,1.47),而 30 天再入院率没有相应变化(12.2%(1948/15902)干预前至 11.7%(397/3379)干预后(p=0.42))。

结论

将医院医生的角色划分为接诊医生和巡诊医生,可以在全院实施基于单元的团队,相应地提高出院效率和住院时间。

相似文献

1
Focusing hospitalist roles on either admitting or rounding facilitates unit-based assignment and is associated with improved discharge efficiency.将主治医生的角色集中在收治或查房上,有利于基于单元的分配,并与提高出院效率相关。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2021 Dec;49(5):371-375. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2021.1985316. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
2
Geographical assignment of hospitalists in an urban teaching hospital: feasibility and impact on efficiency and provider satisfaction.城市教学医院住院医师的地理分配:可行性及其对效率和医疗服务提供者满意度的影响。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2017 Oct;45(4):135-142. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2017.1353884. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
3
Association of the Work Schedules of Hospitalists With Patient Outcomes of Hospitalization.医院医师工作安排与住院患者治疗结果的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Feb 1;180(2):215-222. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.5193.
4
Comparing patient outcomes of academician-preceptors, hospitalist-preceptors, and hospitalists on internal medicine services in an academic medical center.比较学术医疗中心内科服务中院士带教老师、住院医师带教老师和住院医师的患者治疗结果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Dec;29(12):1672-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2982-y.
5
Effect of hospitalist workload on the quality and efficiency of care.医院医师工作量对医疗质量和效率的影响。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 May;174(5):786-93. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.300.
6
Impact of an Overnight Internal Medicine Academic Hospitalist Program on Patient Outcomes.内科住院医师夜间学术项目对患者治疗结果的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Dec;30(12):1795-802. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3389-0. Epub 2015 May 20.
7
Association of care by hospitalists on discharge destination and 30-day outcomes after acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中出院去向和 30 天结局的医院医师照护相关性研究。
Med Care. 2011 Aug;49(8):701-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182166cb6.
8
The Influence of Hospitalist Continuity on the Likelihood of Patient Discharge in General Medicine Patients.住院医师连续性对普通内科患者出院可能性的影响。
J Hosp Med. 2018 Oct 1;13(10):692-694. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2957. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
9
Hospitalist care and length of stay in patients requiring complex discharge planning and close clinical monitoring.对需要复杂出院计划和密切临床监测的患者进行住院医师护理及住院时间。
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Sep 24;167(17):1869-74. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.17.1869.
10
Demonstrating value: association of cost and quality outcomes with implementation of a value-driven oncology-hospitalist inpatient collaboration for patients with lung cancer.价值体现:肺癌患者成本与质量结果与实施以价值为导向的肿瘤内科医生-住院医师住院协作之间的关联
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Mar 17;8(1):e000381. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000381. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Geographic cohorting by clinical care team: a narrative review.临床护理团队的地理分组:叙事评价。
Ann Palliat Med. 2023 Jul;12(4):855-862. doi: 10.21037/apm-22-1400. Epub 2023 Apr 12.