Suppr超能文献

数字互联工作及其对压力的影响——一项系统综述

Digitally connected work and its consequences for strain - a systematic review.

作者信息

Zolg Sabrina, Heiden Barbara, Herbig Britta

机构信息

Institute and Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Ziemsensstr.5, 80336, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

J Occup Med Toxicol. 2021 Sep 22;16(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12995-021-00333-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evolving digitization has an impact not only on the organization of work, but also on the health of employees. Dealing with new technologies, integrating new processes and requirements into work, and restructuring tasks among others are demands that can be stressful and impair health.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to identify (clusters of) working conditions associated with digitally connected work and to analyze their relations with strain, that is, health and well-being outcomes.

METHODS

Between May and October 2019, a search string was used to systematically search six databases (EMBASE, Medline, PSYNDEX, PsycInfo, SocIndex, WISO) for German and English texts according to the PEO scheme. The methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Studies with Diverse Design.

RESULTS

14 studies were identified. Despite the search string containing latest technologies, we identified mostly studies from the 1980s/90s. To aggregate findings, a categorization of work factors (cognitive demands, social factors, organizational factors, environmental factors) and health factors (motivation/satisfaction, reduced well-being/affective symptoms, physiological parameters/somatic complaints) is introduced. The most frequently identified work factors belong to the category of cognitive demands. For health factors, motivation/satisfaction was identified most often. 475 associations were found in total.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review provides an overview of work and health factors that have been studied between 1981 and 2019. Recent texts frequently study individualized health factors (e.g., life satisfaction) whereas objective physiological measurement data and objective survey methods such as workplace analysis are not used. This latter approach was predominantly found in the older studies. In order to obtain a comprehensive picture, however, it is worthwhile to use a combination of these subjective and objective approaches for future studies in this field.

摘要

背景

不断发展的数字化不仅对工作组织有影响,也对员工健康有影响。应对新技术、将新流程和要求融入工作以及重新安排任务等都是可能带来压力并损害健康的要求。

目的

我们的目的是识别与数字化连接工作相关的(集群式)工作条件,并分析它们与压力(即健康和幸福结果)之间的关系。

方法

2019年5月至10月期间,根据PEO方案,使用搜索词系统搜索六个数据库(EMBASE、Medline、PSYNDEX、PsycInfo、SocIndex、WISO)中的德语和英语文本。使用针对不同设计研究的质量评估工具评估方法学质量。

结果

共识别出14项研究。尽管搜索词包含最新技术,但我们识别出的大多是20世纪80年代/90年代的研究。为汇总研究结果,引入了工作因素(认知需求、社会因素、组织因素、环境因素)和健康因素(动机/满意度、幸福感降低/情感症状、生理参数/躯体不适)的分类。最常识别出的工作因素属于认知需求类别。对于健康因素,动机/满意度被识别得最为频繁。总共发现了475种关联。

结论

本系统综述概述了1981年至2019年期间研究的工作和健康因素。近期文本经常研究个体化健康因素(如生活满意度),而未使用客观生理测量数据和工作场所分析等客观调查方法。后一种方法主要出现在较旧的研究中。然而,为了获得全面的情况,在该领域未来的研究中结合使用这些主观和客观方法是值得的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9b9/8456588/12760b28408c/12995_2021_333_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验