Office of Health Economics, London, UK.
City, University of London, London, UK.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022 Jan;20(1):105-117. doi: 10.1007/s40258-021-00683-z. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
The COVID-19 pandemic shows that the impact of effective vaccines can extend well beyond vaccinated individuals and healthcare systems. Yet, these broader value elements are not typically considered in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) which may underestimate vaccines' broader value.
This study aimed to (1) describe the gap between broader value elements identified in value frameworks for vaccines and those recognised in HTA of vaccines in nine developed markets, and (2) develop expert-informed, consensus-based recommendations on how hurdles for broader value recognition could be overcome.
We used a four-step modified Delphi method consisting of literature research (phase I, pearl-growing approach using PubMed Web of Science and Google covering the years 2000-2019), two consecutive phases of expert elicitation (phase II and III, including two email surveys and one virtual round table with 10 experts from 9 countries) and synthesis of recommendations (phase IV).
Results show that about half of the broader value elements relevant to vaccines are not (consistently) considered in HTA processes of multiple higher-income countries. Experts identified five priority areas for broader value recognition, including considering (1) more comprehensive cost offsets within the health care system, (2) carer quality of life, (3) transmission value, (4) prevention of antimicrobial resistance and (5) macroeconomic effects.
To achieve a broader recognition of the value of vaccines, a three-pronged approach was recommended, focusing on (1) Evidence: proactively steering generation of high-quality evidence to quantify the broader value of vaccines to society; (2) Ability: leveraging and further developing existing methodological and analytic expertise to appropriately recognise the broad value of vaccines within HTA processes; (3) Willingness: Stimulating stakeholder engagement to change the status quo and move towards more transparent and comprehensive value assessment processes for vaccines globally.
COVID-19 大流行表明,有效疫苗的影响远远超出了接种者和医疗保健系统。然而,这些更广泛的价值元素通常不在健康技术评估 (HTA) 中考虑,这可能低估了疫苗的更广泛价值。
本研究旨在:(1) 描述疫苗价值框架中确定的更广泛价值要素与九个发达市场疫苗 HTA 中确认的价值要素之间的差距;(2) 制定专家知情的、基于共识的建议,以克服更广泛价值认可的障碍。
我们使用了四步改良 Delphi 方法,包括文献研究 (第一阶段,使用 PubMed Web of Science 和 Google 进行珍珠生成方法,涵盖 2000-2019 年)、两轮专家征求意见 (第二阶段和第三阶段,包括两次电子邮件调查和一次有 9 个国家的 10 名专家参加的虚拟圆桌会议) 和建议综合 (第四阶段)。
结果表明,在多个高收入国家的 HTA 过程中,大约一半与疫苗相关的更广泛价值要素没有 (一致地) 得到考虑。专家确定了五个更广泛价值认可的优先领域,包括考虑 (1) 在医疗保健系统内更全面的成本抵消,(2) 照顾者的生活质量,(3) 传播价值,(4) 预防抗生素耐药性和 (5) 宏观经济影响。
为了更广泛地认可疫苗的价值,建议采取三管齐下的方法,重点关注 (1) 证据:积极引导生成高质量证据,以量化疫苗对社会的更广泛价值;(2) 能力:利用和进一步发展现有的方法学和分析专业知识,在 HTA 过程中适当认可疫苗的广泛价值;(3) 意愿:激发利益相关者的参与,改变现状,在全球范围内推动更透明和全面的疫苗价值评估过程。