Miranda Rafael N, Simmons Alison E, Li Michael W Z, Gebretekle Gebremedhin B, Xi Min, Salvadori Marina I, Warshawsky Bryna, Wong Eva, Ximenes Raphael, Andrew Melissa K, Sander Beate, Singh Davinder, Wilson Sarah, Tunis Matthew, Tuite Ashleigh R
Centre for Immunization Surveillance and Programs, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2515534. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.15534.
With shifting epidemiology and changes in the vaccine funding landscape, resource use considerations for COVID-19 vaccination programs are increasingly important.
To assess the cost effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination programs, where eligibility is defined by combinations of age and chronic medical conditions, including a strategy similar to current Canadian recommendations.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Static, individual-based, probabilistic cost-utility model economic evaluation parameterized with recent data describing COVID-19 epidemiology, vaccine characteristics, and costs. The analysis used a 15-month time horizon from July 2024 to September 2025 and a modeled cohort of 1 million people with characteristics based on the Canadian population, stratified by age group and presence or absence of at least 1 chronic medical condition.
Annual or biannual COVID-19 vaccination strategies offered to different age and medical risk groups, with annual vaccination occurring in October and November in the primary analysis.
Medically attended SARS-CoV-2 infections treated in outpatient and inpatient settings, including post-COVID condition cases and deaths. Costs in 2023 Canadian dollars, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), discounted at 1.5% for the health system and societal perspectives.
Among 1 million simulated individuals, annual vaccination for adults aged 65 years and older consistently emerged as a cost-effective intervention, with ICERs less than CAD $50 000 per QALY compared with no vaccination for a range of model assumptions. Adding a second dose for adults aged 65 years and older or expanding programs to include vaccination for younger age groups, including those at higher risk of COVID-19 due to chronic medical conditions, generally resulted in ICERs greater than $50 000 per QALY. Shifting timing of vaccination programs to better align with periods of high COVID-19 case occurrence resulted in biannual vaccination for those aged 65 years and older being cost effective.
In this economic evaluation of COVID-19 vaccination strategies, programs were observed to be cost effective when focused on groups at higher risk of disease. Optimal timing of programs improved the cost effectiveness of vaccination strategies. As COVID-19 transitioned to an endemic disease with high levels of population immunity, many jurisdictions revisited COVID-19 vaccination recommendations; these results identified COVID-19 vaccination programs that may provide good value for money.
随着流行病学的变化以及疫苗资金格局的改变,新冠疫苗接种计划的资源使用考量变得愈发重要。
评估新冠疫苗接种计划的成本效益,其资格由年龄和慢性疾病状况的组合来定义,包括一种与加拿大当前建议类似的策略。
设计、背景和参与者:基于个体的静态概率成本效用模型经济评估,使用描述新冠疫情流行病学、疫苗特性和成本的近期数据进行参数化。分析采用从2024年7月到2025年9月的15个月时间跨度,并以100万具有加拿大人口特征的人群为模型队列,按年龄组以及是否患有至少一种慢性疾病进行分层。
针对不同年龄和医疗风险组提供的年度或每两年一次的新冠疫苗接种策略,在主要分析中年度接种于10月和11月进行。
在门诊和住院环境中接受治疗的有医疗护理的新冠病毒感染病例,包括新冠后遗症病例和死亡病例。以2023年加拿大元计算的成本、质量调整生命年(QALY)以及增量成本效益比(ICER),从卫生系统和社会角度按1.5%进行贴现。
在100万模拟个体中,65岁及以上成年人的年度疫苗接种始终被证明是一种具有成本效益的干预措施,在一系列模型假设下,与不接种疫苗相比,每获得一个QALY的ICER低于50000加元。为65岁及以上成年人增加第二剂疫苗或扩大计划以包括更年轻年龄组的疫苗接种,包括因慢性疾病而感染新冠风险较高的人群,通常会导致每获得一个QALY的ICER大于50000加元。将疫苗接种计划的时间调整到与新冠高发病期更好地匹配,使得65岁及以上人群的每两年一次疫苗接种具有成本效益。
在这项对新冠疫苗接种策略的经济评估中,观察到当聚焦于疾病风险较高的人群时,疫苗接种计划具有成本效益。计划的最佳时间安排提高了疫苗接种策略的成本效益。随着新冠转变为具有高人群免疫力水平的地方性疾病,许多司法管辖区重新审视了新冠疫苗接种建议;这些结果确定了可能具有良好性价比的新冠疫苗接种计划。