• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调查:佛兰德地区机会性双侧输卵管切除术的可接受性。

Survey: acceptability of opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy in Flanders.

作者信息

Maryns A S, Makar A, Hamerlynck T, De Vree B, Tummers P, Tjalma W A A

出版信息

Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2021 Sep;13(3):241-249. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.13.3.029.

DOI:10.52054/FVVO.13.3.029
PMID:34555878
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8823277/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The VVOG (Flemish Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology) published a consensus statement promoting opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy (OBS).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to obtain insight into the current opinion and general practice of Flemish gynaecologists to counsel and perform OBS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A questionnaire was distributed to Flemish gynaecologists three months following publication.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The drawbacks and incentives to counsel and perform OBS were questioned.

RESULTS

Complete response rate was obtained from 99 gynaecologists (17%) and 37 trainees (19%). The majority of respondents (77%) always counselled for OBS in patients scheduled for hysterectomy without oophorectomy. Eighteen per cent counselled only above a certain age cut off and/or if patient was already menopausal. The most important incentive to counsel in cases of hysterectomy by the abdominal approach and vaginal hysterectomy (VH) was the opportunity to prevent ovarian cancer. The yet-undetermined risk of premature ovarian failure was mentioned as the most important barrier in counselling women for OBS in those undergoing hysterectomy by the abdominal approach. For VH, the respondents saw the risk of complications and increased surgical time as the most important barriers. Sixty-one percent of gynaecologists preferred to perform bilateral salpingectomy as sterilisation method.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that the concept of OBS is already well known in Flanders. There is a positive attitude towards the routine implementation of OBS, although some barriers and doubts about an age cut-off still exist in practice.

摘要

背景

佛兰芒妇产科学会(VVOG)发表了一份共识声明,提倡进行机会性双侧输卵管切除术(OBS)。

目的

本研究旨在深入了解佛兰芒妇科医生在咨询和实施OBS方面的当前观点和一般做法。

材料与方法

在该声明发表三个月后,向佛兰芒妇科医生发放了一份问卷。

主要观察指标

对咨询和实施OBS的弊端及诱因进行了询问。

结果

99名妇科医生(17%)和37名实习生(19%)给出了完整回复。大多数受访者(77%)在为计划行子宫切除术但不切除卵巢的患者提供咨询时总是建议进行OBS。18%的受访者仅在特定年龄界限以上和/或患者已绝经时才提供咨询。在经腹子宫切除术和阴道子宫切除术(VH)的情况下,建议进行OBS的最重要诱因是预防卵巢癌的机会。对于经腹子宫切除术的患者,尚未确定的过早卵巢功能衰竭风险被认为是为其提供OBS咨询时最重要的障碍。对于VH,受访者认为并发症风险和手术时间增加是最重要的障碍。61%的妇科医生更倾向于进行双侧输卵管切除术作为绝育方法。

结论

我们的研究表明,OBS的概念在佛兰德斯已经广为人知。尽管在实践中对于年龄界限仍存在一些障碍和疑虑,但对于OBS的常规实施仍持积极态度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44cc/8823277/90c1fb9f4ff3/FVVinObGyn-13-241-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44cc/8823277/74553a51430c/FVVinObGyn-13-241-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44cc/8823277/fb3f6e491ba3/FVVinObGyn-13-241-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44cc/8823277/51396c8bc0ca/FVVinObGyn-13-241-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44cc/8823277/90c1fb9f4ff3/FVVinObGyn-13-241-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44cc/8823277/74553a51430c/FVVinObGyn-13-241-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44cc/8823277/fb3f6e491ba3/FVVinObGyn-13-241-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44cc/8823277/51396c8bc0ca/FVVinObGyn-13-241-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44cc/8823277/90c1fb9f4ff3/FVVinObGyn-13-241-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Survey: acceptability of opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy in Flanders.调查:佛兰德地区机会性双侧输卵管切除术的可接受性。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2021 Sep;13(3):241-249. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.13.3.029.
2
The rationale of opportunistic bilateral salpingectomies (OBS) during benign gynaecological and obstetric surgery: a consensus text of the Flemish Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (VVOG).良性妇产科手术中进行机会性双侧输卵管切除术(OBS)的基本原理:弗拉芒妇产科协会(VVOG)的共识文本
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2019 Jun;11(2):177-187.
3
Opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy during gynaecological surgery for benign disease: A survey of current Australian practice.妇科良性疾病手术中进行的机会性双侧输卵管切除术:澳大利亚当前实践调查
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Dec;55(6):606-11. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12402. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
4
Feasibility and Outcomes of Opportunistic Bilateral Salpingectomy in Patients with Traditional Relative Contraindications to Vaginal Hysterectomy.传统阴道子宫切除术相对禁忌证患者行机会性双侧输卵管切除术的可行性和结局。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Sep-Oct;27(6):1405-1413. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.12.002. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
5
Operative Outcomes of Opportunistic Bilateral Salpingectomy at the Time of Benign Hysterectomy in Low-Risk Premenopausal Women: A Systematic Review.低风险绝经前女性良性子宫切除术时进行机会性双侧输卵管切除术的手术结局:一项系统评价
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Feb;24(2):218-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.12.004. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
6
'Doing hymen reconstruction': an analysis of perceptions and experiences of Flemish gynaecologists.“进行处女膜修复手术”:对弗拉芒妇科医生的看法和经历的分析
BMC Womens Health. 2018 Jun 13;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0587-z.
7
Patients' and professionals' perspectives on implementation of opportunistic salpingectomy: a mixed-method study.患者和专业人员对机会性输卵管切除术实施的看法:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 25;21(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06767-9.
8
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 774 Summary: Opportunistic Salpingectomy as a Strategy for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Prevention.美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见第 774 号概要:作为上皮性卵巢癌预防策略的机会性输卵管切除术。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;133(4):842-843. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003165.
9
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 774: Opportunistic Salpingectomy as a Strategy for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Prevention.美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见 No.774:机会性输卵管切除术作为上皮性卵巢癌预防策略。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;133(4):e279-e284. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003164.
10
Thirteen Years of Experience with Opportunistic Bilateral Salpingectomy During TLH in Low-Risk Premenopausal Women.低风险绝经前女性行全腹腔镜子宫切除术时进行双侧输卵管切除的13年经验
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2018 Aug;68(4):314-319. doi: 10.1007/s13224-018-1131-7. Epub 2018 May 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Association between pelvic inflammatory disease and subsequent salpingectomy on the risk for ovarian cancer.盆腔炎性疾病与随后的输卵管切除术对卵巢癌风险的关系。
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Mar;145:38-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.11.046. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
2
Easy way to perform salpingectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) (with video).经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vNOTES)行输卵管切除术的简易方法(附有视频)。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 May;50(5):102005. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.102005. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
3
Salpingectomy at the Time of Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
剖宫产术中行输卵管切除术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;135(3):550-557. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003673.
4
Examining indicators of early menopause following opportunistic salpingectomy: a cohort study from British Columbia, Canada.探讨加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省机会性输卵管切除术(salpingectomy)后早绝经的指标:一项队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):221.e1-221.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.005. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
5
The rationale of opportunistic bilateral salpingectomies (OBS) during benign gynaecological and obstetric surgery: a consensus text of the Flemish Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (VVOG).良性妇产科手术中进行机会性双侧输卵管切除术(OBS)的基本原理:弗拉芒妇产科协会(VVOG)的共识文本
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2019 Jun;11(2):177-187.
6
Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy versus hysterectomy alone.全子宫切除术加选择性输卵管切除术与单纯全子宫切除术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 28;8(8):CD012858. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012858.pub2.
7
Population Frequency of Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma (STIC) in Clinical Practice Using SEE-Fim Protocol.采用SEE-Fim方案在临床实践中浆液性输卵管上皮内癌(STIC)的人群发病率
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2018 Dec 14;2(4):pky061. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pky061. eCollection 2018 Oct.
8
Hysterectomy and opportunistic salpingectomy (HOPPSA): study protocol for a register-based randomized controlled trial.子宫切除术和机会性输卵管切除术(HOPPSA):一项基于登记册的随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Jan 5;20(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3083-8.
9
Factors influencing decision-making around opportunistic salpingectomy: a nationwide survey.影响择期输卵管切除术决策的因素:一项全国性调查。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jan;30(1):e2. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e2. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
10
Menopausal symptoms and surgical complications after opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy, a register-based cohort study.绝经症状和机会性双侧输卵管切除术的手术并发症:一项基于登记的队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;220(1):85.e1-85.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.016. Epub 2018 Oct 12.