Centre for Advanced Studies in Biomedical Innovation Law (CeBIL), Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Centre for Advanced Studies in Biomedical Innovation Law (CeBIL), Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Vaccine. 2021 Oct 8;39(42):6291-6295. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.101. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
Collaboration is central for initiatives and efforts in the race to fight COVID-19, with particular focus on fostering rapid development of safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines. We investigated the types of partnerships that have emerged during the pandemic to develop these products. Using the World Health Organization's list of COVID-19 vaccine developments, we found nearly one third of all vaccine candidates were developed by partnerships, which tended to use next-gen vaccine platforms more than solo efforts. These partnerships vary substantially between materials-transfer partnerships and knowledge-sharing partnerships. The difference is important: The type of sharing between partners not only shapes the collaboration, but also bears implications for knowledge and technology development in the field and more broadly. Policies promoting fair and effective collaboration and knowledge-sharing are key for public health to avoid stumbling blocks for vaccine development, deployment, and equitable access, both for COVID-19 and expected future pandemics.
合作是抗击 COVID-19 行动的核心,尤其注重促进安全有效的 COVID-19 疫苗的快速开发。我们研究了在大流行期间为开发这些产品而出现的伙伴关系类型。使用世界卫生组织的 COVID-19 疫苗开发清单,我们发现近三分之一的候选疫苗是由合作伙伴开发的,这些合作伙伴往往比单独努力更多地使用下一代疫苗平台。这些伙伴关系在材料转让伙伴关系和知识共享伙伴关系之间有很大的不同。这种差异很重要:合作伙伴之间的共享类型不仅塑造了合作,而且对该领域乃至更广泛领域的知识和技术发展也有影响。促进公平有效的合作和知识共享的政策是公共卫生的关键,以避免在 COVID-19 疫苗的开发、部署和公平获取方面出现障碍,并为未来可能出现的大流行做好准备。