Suppr超能文献

提高整笔拨款的成果问责制:从预防性健康和健康服务整笔拨款评估中吸取的经验教训。

Improving Outcome Accountability of Block Grants: Lessons Learned From the Preventive Health and Health Services Block Grant Evaluation.

作者信息

Lamia Tamara L, Lowry Garry F, McLees Anita W, Frazier Cassandra M, Young Andrea C

机构信息

Office of the Director, Center for State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial Support, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Division of Population Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Eval. 2020 Oct 14;42(2):185-200. doi: 10.1177/1098214020904137.

Abstract

The flexibility federal block grants provide recipients poses challenges for evaluation. These challenges include aggregating data on wide-ranging activities grant recipients implement and the outcomes they achieve. In 2014, we began designing an evaluation to address the challenges of assessing outcomes and to improve outcome accountability for the Preventive Health and Health Services Block Grant. Through the use of evaluability assessment methodology, review of existing data and the literature, and key informant interviews, we developed a measurement framework to assess outcomes resulting from recipients' ability to use grant funds to meet their locally prioritized needs. We argue our evaluation approach demonstrates that block grants, and other similarly flexible programs, can be evaluated through appropriately designed measures. Our efforts challenge the idea that flexibility presents an insurmountable barrier to evaluation and outcome accountability for federal block grants.

摘要

联邦整笔拨款给予接受者的灵活性给评估带来了挑战。这些挑战包括汇总接受拨款者开展的广泛活动及其取得的成果的数据。2014年,我们开始设计一项评估,以应对评估成果方面的挑战,并提高预防性健康和健康服务整笔拨款的成果问责制。通过使用可评估性评估方法、审查现有数据和文献以及进行关键信息人士访谈,我们制定了一个衡量框架,以评估接受者利用拨款资金满足其当地优先需求的能力所产生的成果。我们认为,我们的评估方法表明,整笔拨款以及其他类似的灵活项目,可以通过适当设计的措施进行评估。我们的努力挑战了这样一种观点,即灵活性对联邦整笔拨款的评估和成果问责制构成了不可逾越的障碍。

相似文献

4
State Priorities and Needs: The Role of Block Grants.州优先事项和需求:拨款补助的作用。
Public Health Rep. 2024 Jul-Aug;139(4):451-457. doi: 10.1177/00333549231205338. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
10
Flexible grant schemes: a systematic scoping review.灵活拨款计划:一项系统的范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 10;25(1):538. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21543-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring public health practice and outcomes in chronic disease: a call for coordination.衡量慢性病公共卫生实践与成果:呼吁协调一致。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S180-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302238. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
2
Defining and assessing quality improvement outcomes: a framework for public health.定义和评估质量改进成果:一个公共卫生框架
Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S167-73. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302533. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
5
Public health quality measurement: concepts and challenges.公共卫生质量评估:概念与挑战
Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:1-21. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.092601.095644. Epub 2001 Oct 25.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验