Shao Qingfeng, Ge Junyi, Ji Qiang, Li Jinhua, Wu Wensheng, Ji Yannan, Zhan Tao, Zhang Chi, Li Qiang, Grün Rainer, Stringer Chris, Ni Xijun
Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment, Ministry of Education, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China.
CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100044, China.
Innovation (Camb). 2021 Aug 28;2(3):100131. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100131.
As one of the most complete archaic human fossils, the Harbin cranium provides critical evidence for studying the diversification of the genus and the origin of . However, the unsystematic recovery of this cranium and a long and confused history since the discovery impede its accurate dating. Here, we carried out a series of geochemical analyses, including non-destructive X-ray fluorescence (XRF), rare earth elements (REE), and the Sr isotopes, to test the reported provenance of the Harbin cranium and get better stratigraphic constraints. The results show that the Harbin cranium has very similar XRF element distribution patterns, REE concentration patterns, and Sr isotopic compositions to those of the Middle Pleistocene-Holocene mammalian and human fossils recently recovered from the Harbin area. The sediments adhered in the nasal cavity of the Harbin cranium have a Sr/Sr ratio of 0.711898, falling in the variation range measured in a core drilled near the Dongjiang Bridge, where the cranium was discovered during its reconstruction. The regional stratigraphic correlations indicate that the Harbin cranium was probably from the upper part of the Upper Huangshan Formation of the Harbin area, which has an optically stimulated luminescence dating constraint between 138 and 309 ka. U-series disequilibrium dating (n = 10) directly on the cranium suggests that the cranium is older than 146 ka. The multiple lines of evidence from our experiments consistently support the theory that the Harbin cranium is from the late Middle Pleistocene of the Harbin area. Our study also shows that geochemical approaches can provide reliable evidence for locating and dating unsystematically recovered human fossils, and potentially can be applied to other human fossils without clear provenance and stratigraphy records.
作为最完整的古人类化石之一,哈尔滨颅骨为研究该属的多样性和起源提供了关键证据。然而,该颅骨的非系统发掘以及自发现以来漫长而混乱的历史阻碍了其精确测年。在此,我们进行了一系列地球化学分析,包括无损X射线荧光分析(XRF)、稀土元素(REE)分析和锶同位素分析,以检验报道的哈尔滨颅骨的出处并获得更好的地层约束。结果表明,哈尔滨颅骨的XRF元素分布模式、REE浓度模式和锶同位素组成与最近在哈尔滨地区发现的中更新世至全新世哺乳动物和人类化石非常相似。附着在哈尔滨颅骨鼻腔内的沉积物的锶/锶比值为0.711898,落在在东江桥附近钻取的岩芯中测得的变化范围内,该颅骨在重建过程中于此处被发现。区域地层对比表明,哈尔滨颅骨可能来自哈尔滨地区黄山组上部,其光释光测年约束在138至309 ka之间。对颅骨直接进行的铀系不平衡测年(n = 10)表明,该颅骨的年代早于146 ka。我们实验中的多条证据一致支持哈尔滨颅骨来自哈尔滨地区中更新世晚期的理论。我们的研究还表明,地球化学方法可为非系统发掘的人类化石的定位和测年提供可靠证据,并有可能应用于其他没有明确出处和地层记录的人类化石。