School of Education, Campus Santa Apolónia, Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, Bragança, Portugal.
Campus Rio Pomba, Federal Institute Southeast of Minas Gerais, Rio Pomba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Eat Weight Disord. 2022 Jun;27(5):1651-1659. doi: 10.1007/s40519-021-01301-6. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
To verify the validity of anthropometric methods body adiposity index (BAI), relative fat mass (RFM) and body fat index (BFI) to estimate body fat percentage (%BF) in adolescents.
A cross-sectional study was carried out with 420 Brazilian adolescents aged 15-19 years, stratified by age (< 18 years, n = 356; ≥ 18 years, n = 64) and sex (boys, n = 216; girls, n = 204). The Anthropometric measurements height, body weight, hip circumference and waist circumference were collected to calculate the %BF by BAI, RFM, BFI methods. Subsequently, %BF was measured by dual emission X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), adopted as a reference method. In the statistical analysis of the data, the Pearson correlation test and the paired t test between %BF obtained by the equations and by the DXA were performed. The method validation criterion was that 68% of individuals should be within an acceptable error range of ± 3.5% of BF and Cohen's Kappa index ≥ 0.61. Additionally, the Bland-Altman graphical analysis was performed.
All methods showed a high correlation with DXA. For the Kappa index, only the RFM reached the criterion in the total sample (0.67) and in the sample < 18 years (0.68). None of the methods reached the criterion of 68% of the sample within the error range of ± 3.5% of BF.
The BAI, RFM and BFI equations were not valid for predicting BF in the studied sample according to the criteria adopted regardless of sex or age.
Level V, cross-sectional descriptive study.
验证人体肥胖指数(BAI)、相对脂肪量(RFM)和体脂指数(BFI)等人体脂肪测量法在青少年人群中估算体脂百分比(%BF)的有效性。
本研究为横断面研究,纳入 420 名年龄在 15-19 岁的巴西青少年,按年龄(<18 岁,n=356;≥18 岁,n=64)和性别(男,n=216;女,n=204)分层。收集身高、体重、臀围和腰围等人体测量数据,采用 BAI、RFM 和 BFI 方法计算 %BF。随后,采用双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)测量 %BF,作为参考方法。在数据分析中,采用 Pearson 相关检验和方程计算的 %BF 与 DXA 测量值之间的配对 t 检验。验证方法的标准为 68%的个体应处于 BF 误差范围±3.5%内,Kappa 指数≥0.61。此外,还进行了 Bland-Altman 图形分析。
所有方法与 DXA 均具有高度相关性。Kappa 指数方面,仅 RFM 法在总样本(0.67)和<18 岁样本(0.68)中达到标准。在 BF 误差范围±3.5%内,没有任何一种方法能达到 68%的样本量标准。
根据所采用的标准,BAI、RFM 和 BFI 方程在本研究样本中不能有效地预测 BF,且与性别或年龄无关。
V 级,横断面描述性研究。