• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同种植体-基台锥度角的窄径种植体的存活率和应力分布。

Probability of survival and stress distribution of narrow diameter implants with different implant-abutment taper angles.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil.

Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.

出版信息

J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2022 Mar;110(3):638-645. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34942. Epub 2021 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1002/jbm.b.34942
PMID:34559448
Abstract

This study evaluated the probability of survival, failure mode, and stress distribution of narrow diameter implants (NDIs) with internal implant-abutment conical connection comprised of different taper angles and thread designs. Sixty-three NDIs (Ø 3.5 × 8.5 mm) were divided according to the taper angle (TA), internal diameter (ID), and trapezoidal thread design (TD) (n = 21/group), as follows: (a) 11.5°U (11.5° TA; ID: 2.5 mm; TD: dual threaded); (b) 11.5°S (11.5° TA; ID: 2.5 mm; TD: single threaded); (c) 16°S (16° TA; ID: 2.72 mm; TD: single threaded). They were subjected to step-stress accelerated life testing. The reliability and use-level probability Weibull curves were calculated at 50, 100, and 150 N for a mission of 100,000 cycles and the failure mode was analyzed using a scanning electron microscope. For finite element analysis the von-Mises stress (σ ) was calculated for the abutment and implant. All groups showed high reliability (above 84%) and failures occurred predominantly in the abutment. In the FEA, 11.5°U showed higher σ for the implant. All NDIs showed high reliability at clinically challenging loads. The system with greater taper angle showed lower σ in the implant, and dual threaded implants showed a higher stress concentration in the implant and cortical bone.

摘要

本研究评估了具有不同锥度角和螺纹设计的内植入物-基台锥形连接的小直径种植体(NDIs)的生存概率、失效模式和应力分布。根据锥度角(TA)、内径(ID)和梯形螺纹设计(TD)将 63 个 NDIs(Ø 3.5×8.5mm)分为 21 组(每组 n=21),如下:(a)11.5°U(11.5° TA;ID:2.5mm;TD:双螺纹);(b)11.5°S(11.5° TA;ID:2.5mm;TD:单螺纹);(c)16°S(16° TA;ID:2.72mm;TD:单螺纹)。它们接受了步应力加速寿命测试。在 50、100 和 150N 下计算了 50、100 和 150N 的可靠性和使用水平概率威布尔曲线,100,000 次循环的任务,使用扫描电子显微镜分析失效模式。对于有限元分析,计算了基台和种植体的 von-Mises 应力(σ)。所有组的可靠性均高于 84%(较高),且失效主要发生在基台上。在有限元分析中,11.5°U 显示出较高的种植体 σ。所有 NDIs 在临床上具有挑战性的负荷下均显示出较高的可靠性。具有较大锥度角的系统在种植体中显示出较低的 σ,而双螺纹种植体在种植体和皮质骨中显示出更高的应力集中。

相似文献

1
Probability of survival and stress distribution of narrow diameter implants with different implant-abutment taper angles.不同种植体-基台锥度角的窄径种植体的存活率和应力分布。
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2022 Mar;110(3):638-645. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34942. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
2
Fracture strength and probability of survival of narrow and extra-narrow dental implants after fatigue testing: In vitro and in silico analysis.疲劳测试后窄型和超窄型牙种植体的断裂强度及存活概率:体外和计算机模拟分析
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Jul;71:244-249. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.03.022. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
3
Survival Probability of Narrow and Standard-Diameter Implants with Different Implant-Abutment Connection Designs.不同种植体-基台连接设计的窄直径和标准直径种植体的生存概率
Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Mar-Apr;29(2):179-85. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4232.
4
Biomechanical evaluation of internal and external hexagon platform switched implant-abutment connections: An in vitro laboratory and three-dimensional finite element analysis.内外六方平台转换种植体-基台连接的生物力学评估:体外实验室和三维有限元分析。
Dent Mater. 2012 Oct;28(10):e218-28. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
5
Fatigue Failure of Narrow Implants with Different Implant-Abutment Connection Designs.不同种植体-基台连接设计的窄径种植体疲劳失效
J Prosthodont. 2018 Aug;27(7):659-664. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12540. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
6
Comparison of the fracture resistance of dental implants with different abutment taper angles.不同基台锥度角度的牙种植体抗折能力比较。
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Jun;63:164-71. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.02.015. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
7
Mechanical Resistance of a 2.9-mm-Diameter Dental Implant With a Morse-Taper Implant-Abutment Connection.直径为 2.9 毫米的牙科种植体与莫氏锥度种植体-基台连接的抗机械阻力。
J Oral Implantol. 2023 Jun 1;49(3):323-329. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-21-00258.
8
Failure Modes and Survival of Anterior Crowns Supported by Narrow Implant Systems.窄种植体系统支持的前牙冠的失效模式和存活率。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Sep 7;2020:1057846. doi: 10.1155/2020/1057846. eCollection 2020.
9
[Comparative analysis of different types of implant-abutment interface on the basis of three-dimensional finite element analysis data].基于三维有限元分析数据的不同类型种植体-基台界面的比较分析
Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2019;98(1):11-16. doi: 10.17116/stomat20199801111.
10
Influence of platform diameter in the reliability and failure mode of extra-short dental implants.平台直径对超短牙种植体可靠性和失效模式的影响。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Jan;77:470-474. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.09.020. Epub 2017 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Fatigue Resistance of Customized Implant-Supported Restorations.定制种植体支持修复体的抗疲劳性能
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jul 21;18(14):3420. doi: 10.3390/ma18143420.
2
Influence of prosthetic index structures and implant materials on stress distribution in implant restorations: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.种植体修复体中修复指数结构和种植体材料对种植体周围骨组织应力分布的影响:三维有限元分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 6;24(1):901. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04680-1.
3
The Comparison of Survival Rates between Narrow Diameter Implants and Standard Diameter Implants: An Updated Meta-analysis.
窄径种植体与标准径种植体生存率的比较:一项更新的Meta分析。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2023 Feb 9;37:5. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.37.5. eCollection 2023.